Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Texas officials reading this, I live in AZ. Sometimes I’m in TN. Sometimes Im in CO. Probably going to CA soon.

But I always vote in TX. Property rights. Suck my dick. Bolth of em.

Posted
2 hours ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

I'd really, really like to horsewhip every single fucking Republican alive.  Cunts, one and all. 

Blame the people who voted for them. 

Posted

Reduced numbers of medical students selecting the OB-Gyn specialty is going to be a tough reckoning nationwide, but hey, as long as a guy can get his ED pills and such, I guess nothing else matters. Some men (and women) forget that there is more to womens' healthcare than just birthing babies. The states (besides Idaho) that decide not to keep too close an eye on maternal mortality may be the lead indicator (that a situation is worsening), but overall life expectancy (for women) may worsen in general. Over 80% of women who seek gynecological care are between 18-45, but gynecologists diagnose and treat other issues with female reproductive organs.

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Reduced numbers of medical students selecting the OB-Gyn specialty is going to be a tough reckoning nationwide, but hey, as long as a guy can get his ED pills and such, I guess nothing else matters. Some men (and women) forget that there is more to womens' healthcare than just birthing babies. The states (besides Idaho) that decide not to keep too close an eye on maternal mortality may be the lead indicator (that a situation is worsening), but overall life expectancy (for women) may worsen in general. Over 80% of women who seek gynecological care are between 18-45, but gynecologists diagnose and treat other issues with female reproductive organs.

 

Counterpoint: tough shit, bitches, that's the burden you deserve because of that shit that Eve did with the snake and the apple.  Shut up and take the punishment you deserve.

I wish that what I just typed was entirely ironic.  It is not.

Posted
1 hour ago, royiv said:

These numbers are so eye popping that I don't even know if they should be believed. This would represent about 7-8% of all births in Texas. Truly astounding. I though Greg was going to eliminate rape?

More than 26K rape-related pregnancies estimated after Texas outlawed abortions, new study says

Here is the research letter that that paywalled article is based on. 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2814274?

 

Posted
On 1/24/2024 at 3:21 PM, mchookem said:

i think i relayed earlier what a difficult time my college-age niece is having getting birth control prescribed in North Texas...

anyways she was just visiting here in Denver and we passed a Planned Parenthood place and i was remembering and telling her about the 'good old days' - yes, in Texas - where my friends and i in high school in Houston would drive ourselves to PP and get free pap smears, pregnancy and std tests, and birth control. she was amazed... and it really brought home just how much Texas has regressed in my lifetime. it's seriously mind-boggling. 😐 

I'm at the point now where the "it's God's will" crowd that dominates the laws surrounding women's reproductive rights can now ban ED and Low T pharmaceuticals because it is God's will that a male has these issues. Women should be able to sue anyone that aids or abets a male who receives medical assistance in this matter.

Not so extreme when one considers the lengths at which the state would like to interfere with women's medical care.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Mrs Whiggins said:

I'm at the point now where the "it's God's will" crowd that dominates the laws surrounding women's reproductive rights can now ban ED and Low T pharmaceuticals because it is God's will that a male has these issues. Women should be able to sue anyone that aids or abets a male who receives medical assistance in this matter.

Not so extreme when one considers the lengths at which the state would like to interfere with women's medical care.

I 100% support a law banning any ED treatments for a man who is not in a traditional, male-female marriage.  It is an affront to God to provide boners to men who would be, by definition, fornicating or committing sodomy.  I demand that this state play NO PART in supporting fornication or sodomy.

I'm confident that all my fellow Christian leaders will go along with me, right?

Wait, what's that?  They'll do no such thing, because none of this is actually about morality, being pro-life, or any of that shit?  It's JUST about subjugating women?  Well gosh-golly, I'm quite shocked by that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

The ones that are abusing minors certainly won't.

Well, I'm confident that a significant number of Christian "pastors" and other Republican leaders will tell you that there are few things more disappointing than having the chance to sodomize a minor, but not being able to pop wood when the opportunity presents itself.  It's really the only thing that makes Republicans sad these days.

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
On 1/25/2024 at 4:18 PM, Brisketexan said:

I 100% support a law banning any ED treatments for a man who is not in a traditional, male-female marriage.  It is an affront to God to provide boners to men who would be, by definition, fornicating or committing sodomy.  I demand that this state play NO PART in supporting fornication or sodomy.

I'm confident that all my fellow Christian leaders will go along with me, right?

Wait, what's that?  They'll do no such thing, because none of this is actually about morality, being pro-life, or any of that shit?  It's JUST about subjugating women?  Well gosh-golly, I'm quite shocked by that.

Nah, I could see them trying to ban gays from getting ED treatment.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
9 hours ago, HenryJames said:

https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/study-cited-texas-judge-abortion-pill-case-retracted

Two of the key studies cited by plaintiffs and judges as evidence that medication abortion should be pulled from the market or heavily restricted have been retracted because of undeclared conflicts of interest and unreliable findings, academic publisher Sage announced Monday. 

Another citation for this:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-publisher-retracts-studies-cited-by-texas-judge-suspending-abortion-pills-2024-02-06/

So another major civil rights restricting case, turning on a set of fucking LIES, that we all just have to live with because facts fucking don't matter in our legal system anymore

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Another citation for this:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-publisher-retracts-studies-cited-by-texas-judge-suspending-abortion-pills-2024-02-06/

So another major civil rights restricting case, turning on a set of fucking LIES, that we all just have to live with because facts fucking don't matter in our legal system anymore

The judge’s first duty is to their client 

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
Posted
38 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Another citation for this:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-publisher-retracts-studies-cited-by-texas-judge-suspending-abortion-pills-2024-02-06/

So another major civil rights restricting case, turning on a set of fucking LIES, that we all just have to live with because facts fucking don't matter in our legal system anymore

“Sage said in its retraction notice that it had independent experts look at the two studies, as well as a third study led by Studnicki, in response to a reader's concern.”

Hey Sage Publications, maybe try doing that BEFORE publishing a study next time. Some people refer to that as “peer review.” It helps prevent you from embarrassing yourself by publishing junk science.

I’ve never heard of Sage Publications before but now I know they don’t employ a rigorous review process before publication and I’ll be skeptical whenever I see their name attached to any study. Nice job, folks. 

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
23 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

Missouri seems like it sucks ….

 

Quote

While rape would be “mentally taxing” for anyone, said Republican state Sen. Sandy Crawford, it doesn’t justify an abortion. 

“God is perfect,” she said. “God does not make mistakes. And for some reason he allows that to happen. Bad things happen.” 

Missouri giving Texas a run for its money Just unbelievable that anyone would say this. 

  • Rage+1 6
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)

I honestly do not understand how a single fucking woman in this country with a modicum of intelligence could vote Republican at this point.  It is shocking how fucking idiotic some of my fellow women are.

Edited by PenelopeWitherspoon
  • Hook 'Em 9
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
I honestly do not understand how a single fucking woman in this country with a modicum of intelligence could vote Republican at this point.  It is shocking how fucking idiotic some of my fellow women are.

But god…. Or something.
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
On 2/9/2024 at 1:46 PM, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

I honestly do not understand how a single fucking woman in this country with a modicum of intelligence could vote Republican at this point.  It is shocking how fucking idiotic some of my fellow women are.

American Christianity is a cult that believe in guns and white male power. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
On 2/7/2024 at 9:40 PM, tx 3 putt said:

 

Why wouldn't the father also be charged?

Admittedly, Moffitt's  is an insane mindset, but hell, at least be consistent.

Posted
5 minutes ago, slorch said:

Why wouldn't the father also be charged?

Admittedly, Moffitt's  is an insane mindset, but hell, at least be consistent.

Because the idea is to punish women.

I've never heard anything about this guy Moffitt except for this post. What's insane about his mindset? Perhaps you're confusing the man who wrote the tweet with the state senator who filed the bill?

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, slorch said:

Why wouldn't the father also be charged?

Admittedly, Moffitt's  is an insane mindset, but hell, at least be consistent.

Because anti-abortion laws are passed to take away women's rights, not men's. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, slorch said:

Why wouldn't the father also be charged?

Admittedly, Moffitt's  is an insane mindset, but hell, at least be consistent.

 

44 minutes ago, Bojack said:

Because the idea is to punish women.

I've never heard anything about this guy Moffitt except for this post. What's insane about his mindset? Perhaps you're confusing the man who wrote the tweet with the state senator who filed the bill?

 

Yeah, when you see the inconsistencies applied consistently to only one gender, you can probably assume its purpose is to control women and what they can or cannot do without regard to their health or well-being.

Imagine being the husband of a woman you love dearly with an ectopic pregnancy that would result in neither the wife nor the embryo (I doubt it'd even reach the fetal stage of development). Here are your options under a law that only punishes the woman:

  1. You both do nothing, and the wife & embryo expire. You're left alone.
  2. You don't know or feign ignorance that the wife gets out of state and aborts the embryo. She gets away with it, and the two of you can try again.
  3. You don't know or feign ignorance that the wife gets out of state and aborts the embryo. She gets caught and goes to jail. You're left alone.
  4. You help your wife get out of state to abort the embryo. Y'all get away with it, and the two of you can try again.
  5. You help your wife get out of state to abort the embryo. She gets caught and goes to jail. You're left alone.

Only options 2 & 5 allow the two of you to lead your lives, but you'll be filled with dread that there'd be another similar complication in a second pregnancy, and you'd have to do it all over again with the same risks of your wife dying or going to jail.

Of course, they could also punish the father with jail time, but that wouldn't give him the option to breed with another woman after his wife dies, or he could divorce her while she's in jail and go on to breed.

The man, while alone, gets another chance. The woman, none.



×
×
  • Create New...