Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Pods said:

It looks like Ivanka had buccal fat pad removal done when she was younger. It's a common surgery that creates a sunken cheek look when normally the cheeks are puffy. It makes younger women look older and more mature, but that comes with an obvious cost later. Compare her cheeks now to below. 

image.png.0b904b36c5c5171fe651a163c833412f.png

See these before and after pics from a plastic surgery website. 

image.png.37c624866a5d38a1013426fb352c97d2.png

 

The problem is when women get older, the fat in the area goes away naturally. This creates a sunken look naturally that looks like meth mouth when they've had buccal fat pad surgery as well. It looks gaunt and shitty, so they have to get other implants to stretch the area out try to make it look normal, which doesn't work. 

No matter what they do, they are chasing away meth mouth. 

Ivanka's a meth head?  I'm running with it.

Posted
She's a fake blond basic mousy girl who got a lot of work done to become a fake socialite largely rejected by her own city only to settle for that sex symbol....Jared Kushner, then washed up in fucking Flouriduh like the rest of the wealthy trash.

Yep. Wouldn’t have poked her with @YGIFS dick. And still wouldn’t. She’s a loathsome toad.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


Yep. Wouldn’t have poked her with @YGIFS dick. And still wouldn’t. She’s a loathsome toad.

Hey, leave my dick out of this.  And you guys are out of your fucking minds with this, "I wouldn't fuck Ivanka...I have my pride."  Bullshit.  We'd all fuck her, pre or post surgery for the thrill of it.  And you fucking know it.  I honestly don't know what wanna-be Fairfield-Greenwich vocal fry sounds like with a mouthful of cum, but I am willing to learn on her time.  Only downside, assuming my wife doesn't find out, is I'd be Eskimo Brothers with Donald Trump.  

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
Hey, leave my dick out of this.  And you guys are out of your fucking minds with this, "I wouldn't fuck Ivanka...I have my pride."  Bullshit.  We'd all fuck her, pre or post surgery for the thrill of it.  And you fucking know it.  I honestly don't know what wanna-be Fairfield-Greenwich vocal fry sounds like with a mouthful of cum, but I am willing to learn on her time.  Only downside, assuming my wife doesn't find out, is I'd be Eskimo Brothers with Donald Trump.  
Whilst single I'd fuck most anything. Not her tho, she fucking sucks. Give me a chubby chick with a pretty face and fun attitude over this emotionally damage ditch pig, to you use the parlance of our time.
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Whilst single I'd fuck most anything. Not her tho, she fucking sucks. Give me a chubby chick with a pretty face and fun attitude over this emotionally damage ditch pig, to you use the parlance of our time.

This. She’s surely terrible in the sack, she’s a horrific wreck of a person. Nope.
  • Like 1
Posted

You know what?  You guys are sick and twisted, but at least you had integrity.  But now you're just full of shit.

For 20+ fucking years, I've been on the myriad incarnations of this site and there's been forum after forum and thread after thread about what we'd do to a tall blonde with big tits and daddy issues.  And everybody chimed in their same version of deviant fantasy.  Then...there comes along an actual decent looking blonde with big tits and the most serious daddy issues since the book of Genesis who is so down to clown in poundtown, it's not even salaciously viable...and all you fuckers just conveniently get a moral compass?  Fuck that.  

We'd all smash our political release into her while she squirted her guilt out and everybody'd fucking love it.  I mean, if you can get past the part where Jared's in the corner jerking off chanting about what time it is in Dubai for some weird reason.  Seriously man, I don't need your 'time/weather' creepy voice stamp getting the way of my strokes bro.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

You know what?  You guys are sick and twisted, but at least you had integrity.  But now you're just full of shit.

For 20+ fucking years, I've been on the myriad incarnations of this site and there's been forum after forum and thread after thread about what we'd do to a tall blonde with big tits and daddy issues.  And everybody chimed in their same version of deviant fantasy.  Then...there comes along an actual decent looking blonde with big tits and the most serious daddy issues since the book of Genesis who is so down to clown in poundtown, it's not even salaciously viable...and all you fuckers just conveniently get a moral compass?  Fuck that.  

We'd all smash our political release into her while she squirted her guilt out and everybody'd fucking love it.  I mean, if you can get past the part where Jared's in the corner jerking off chanting about what time it is in Dubai for some weird reason.  Seriously man, I don't need your 'time/weather' creepy voice stamp getting the way of my strokes bro.  

 

IMG_0541.gif

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-judge-orders-former-chief-justice-to-turn-over-records-related-to-impeachment-advice/ar-AA1jIuQR?cvid=ba1fd945a6de4846ae25771177cb1299&ei=22

Quote

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge on Friday ordered the former chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to produce records related to her work advising the Republican Assembly speaker on whether to impeach a current justice.

Former Chief Justice Patience Roggensack was one of three former Supreme Court justices asked by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos to give him advice on pursuing impeachment.

Nice to see some sunshine on GQP behind the scenes shittery.   I guess separation of powers includes working with the legislature to impeach one of the justices.    

Edited by Gatorubet
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-judge-orders-former-chief-justice-to-turn-over-records-related-to-impeachment-advice/ar-AA1jIuQR?cvid=ba1fd945a6de4846ae25771177cb1299&ei=22

Nice to see some sunshine on GQP behind the scenes shittery.   I guess separation of powers includes working with the legislature to impeach one of the justices.    

First of all, Wisconsin is not even in the Constitution...

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I honestly think she looked better pre-(latest) surgery.

Of course she did.

 

I swear everyone that gets these surgeries looks demonstrably worse after

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted
2 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-judge-orders-former-chief-justice-to-turn-over-records-related-to-impeachment-advice/ar-AA1jIuQR?cvid=ba1fd945a6de4846ae25771177cb1299&ei=22

Nice to see some sunshine on GQP behind the scenes shittery.   I guess separation of powers includes working with the legislature to impeach one of the justices.    

And who will care?

Posted
2 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

IMG_1931.webp.3032d2283a7209d801602d3e7fdf4955.webp

I need to watch Brazil again.

One of my all time favorites.  And how appropriate for today’s situation, and portent.  No one to save us, poor idiots we were to believe such.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Cannon rejected Trump's motion for a continuance of the trial date. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/215/united-states-v-trump/

 

"Defendants’ Motion to Continue Trial, currently set for the two-week period commencing on May 20, 2024, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to be considered at a scheduling conference on March 1, 2024, following the initial set of pre-trial and CIPA steps in this proceeding as outlined below."

Reading between the lines it wouldn't be shocking at all that come March the trial gets kicked down the road a bit due to the unique and challenging issues of the case. 

Posted
2 hours ago, mantis toboggan said:

IMG_0659.jpeg

why did you drop the leprechaun sketch from your avatar?  that always made me laugh every time you posted.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, gernblansten said:

"Defendants’ Motion to Continue Trial, currently set for the two-week period commencing on May 20, 2024, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to be considered at a scheduling conference on March 1, 2024, following the initial set of pre-trial and CIPA steps in this proceeding as outlined below."

Reading between the lines it wouldn't be shocking at all that come March the trial gets kicked down the road a bit due to the unique and challenging issues of the case. 

Yeah it's still on the table, and probably would be in any court in the US with the issues that may be arising.

  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...