Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

On top of the obvious "if your party controls more than 1/3 of the Senate, you can murder your political rivals" conclusion, now is also where we remember that almost every single Senator cited that Trump was no longer physically in office as their reason for voting against impeachment.

Given that argument combined with the arguments presented today, we are basically attempting to greenlight the Purge for any elected official in their last few weeks of office.

Edited by Chuckie Finster
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Underdog said:

Can’t wait to see Tyus and Rob Schneider on Fox tonight weighing in on this appeal. 


please, this is a serious matter, they’re bringing on the big guns ….

90s phone GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
14 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Oh good. "Should presidents be allowed to assassinate their political opponents? There are arguments on both sides. We'll discuss, next." 

Do you work for CNN? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted (edited)

What the argument presupposes is that the hypothetical President has had ST6 kill enough opposition members of the house/senate so that he cannot be impeached/convicted.

 

We're through the looking glass, people.  

Edited by dcbc
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Neonmoon said:

Do you work for CNN? 

This is how this shit has worked for about eight years now. You hear something ridiculous from Dotard or Team Dotard, and next thing you know it's being "debated", as if it's a real issue.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

On top of the obvious "if your party controls more than 1/3 of the Senate, you can murder your political rivals" conclusion, now is also where we remember that almost every single Senator cited that Trump was no longer physically in office as their reason for voting against impeachment.

Given that argument combined with the arguments presented today, we are basically attempting to greenlight the Purge for any elected official in their last few weeks of office.

Its even worse than that.  Since the Speaker of the House and Senate Majority leader must bring impeachment proceedings up for a vote,  having just ONE of these individuals in their pockets means no successful impeachment/conviction.    At that point, if anyone speaks up, have them killed before a vote can be called, or hell, kill them during the vote and all resistance magically disappears.  So basically the president and ONE other individual have the constitutional right to impose their will on the entire country without consequence.   Just like the framers  intended.... 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
18 minutes ago, Horn Dog said:

I mean I guess this mean Biden is free to save democracy by any means necessary at this point.   Trump, prepare thy anus!

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

For the first time, kinda thinking Trump's lawyers may be on to something...

  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

Also my immediate take. Hope that was the follow up to the trump attorney answer. 

Edited by Pato del Muerto
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Can’t Biden just ban Trump from the election since the the sitting potus can do whatever the fuck he wants?

I kinda like the more extreme option, but OK I guess.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

If the court decides for dotard on this, I would expect Biden to have ST6 execute dotard immediately.  I'm okay w/ that. 

 

57 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

As long as Biden has control of Senate and there is no vote to convict, then per Trump's attorneys, Biden can order Seal Team 6 to kill Trump and not be criminally liable. 

giphy.gif

Edited by C-Man
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

hold on… I’m thinking. If Biden can do that, then Biden as commander in chief should reopen the selective service, drafting only Trump, his sons and Jared.

We can televise Boot Camp. It will be a modern-day Gomer Pyle….with pain. Everyone can hear his nonstop insulting of all things military. Then station him in some frozen Quonset hut in Alaska. If he leaves his post, he’s arrested for desertion.

 

If we are going to get creative, I'd prefer he had him boiled in oil at halftime of the upcoming Superbowl.  To make it fun, maybe a dunk tank.  

  • Drool 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chuckie Finster said:

On top of the obvious "if your party controls more than 1/3 of the Senate, you can murder your political rivals" conclusion, now is also where we remember that almost every single Senator cited that Trump was no longer physically in office as their reason for voting against impeachment.

Given that argument combined with the arguments presented today, we are basically attempting to greenlight the Purge for any elected official in their last few weeks of office.

Most of Trumps voters want him to do the purge so this doesn’t really damage him. 

Posted
18 hours ago, YGIFS said:

True.  But I to go back to the historical notion, which admittedly is not a terra firma legal foundation, that these portions of the constitution simply could not encompass shit like this.  They could not be that prophetic.  The concept of a “country” so damn new and ideologically vague, that leading a usurpation of one was beyond the pale.  
there are AI crimes that will be committed in a decade’s time that not even the most visionary IP attorney or judge can foresee.  But they must be held accountable for the very simple reason that we were not capable of forecasting such gross abuses.  
 

I’ve also noticed a marked pivot away from “can’t catch me, I’m running for President!” To “it all still falls under my prior role and executive privilege!”

The guiding philosophy of the majority of the Supreme Court boils down to “the founders could have never imagined people as awful as us, ergo whatever we do must be allowed.” 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

If there was ever a "never interrupt your opponent when he's making a mistake" moment, this is it.  FAFO.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

hold on… I’m thinking. If Biden can do that, then Biden as commander in chief should reopen the selective service, drafting only Trump, his sons and Jared.

Don't stop there, go ahead and draft Tucker, Hannity, Watters, Gym, Gaetz, mtg, boobs, Catturd, Fitton, etc... 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
Just now, C-Man said:

 

The Democrats could be handed this power on a silver platter and wouldn't use it. Can't say the same for Republicans.

maybe they'll use it to prevent the pubs from ever getting to it. nah, that would be too off brand for them. fucking cowards

Posted
I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

This supposes SCOTUS would apply the same standard to both parties which is utterly laughable right now.
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
The Democrats could be handed this power on a silver platter and wouldn't use it. Can't say the same for Republicans.

This is true. The Democratic Party may actually be stupider than the Republican Party. Bold statement, I know.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

Meanwhile, on Fox News:

image.png.644b4f13dcbea5f7b0aeee7c8ba48730.png

There's not a single word on the entire site, that I could find, about the hearing today. 

still not a major headline (they had the GA DA about some illicit love and Sec Def having cancer) but they did add it way at the bottom with the shittiest fuckhead traitor title, "Trump attorney argues Biden is prosecuting his 'greatest electoral threat". FoxNews is a bunch of traitor shitheads.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BamaATL said:

If we are going to get creative, I'd prefer he had him boiled in oil at halftime of the upcoming Superbowl.  To make it fun, maybe a dunk tank.  

There is a hole in this plan.  That sonuvabitch is so fat, he can walk on oil.

Posted
1 hour ago, tx 3 putt said:

I know it'll happen, but there's no way the courts can rule for trump on all this without giving biden absolute power ?

“This ruling only applies to the current case before the court.”

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted (edited)

Donald Trump’s Bid For Absolute Immunity Likely To Fail After Court Arguments

Three appeals court judges appeared ready to reject Trump’s argument that presidents cannot be prosecuted for ordering the murder of their political opponents.

Paul Blumenthal

Edited by Bullneck
  • Haha 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

Donald Trump’s Bid For Absolute Immunity Likely To Fail After Court Arguments

Three appeals court judges appeared ready to reject Trump’s argument that presidents cannot be prosecuted for ordering the murder of their political opponents.

Paul Blumenthal

This might help: 

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-absolute-immunity-appeals_n_659d6fcde4b075f4cfd402a3

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BamaATL said:

If we are going to get creative, I'd prefer he had him boiled in oil at halftime of the upcoming Superbowl.  To make it fun, maybe a dunk tank.  

With spots in line going by auction- one throw each?

Posted
15 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

Republican nominee for President: I should be able to kill my opponent.

Surly: This reflects poorly on Democrats.

No one attacks the Dems harder than the people who vote for them 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Posted

To be mathematically correct, there are more admitted Gary Johnson 2016 voters than there are Donald Trump 2020 voters on Surly which of course is a statistical impossibility given the site's demography.  

I'm no Democrat.  But I helped Team Biden all I could in 2020 for the very simple reason that bundling money and turning out voters for him was morally easier than taking his extreme 1/3rd (25mm voters) on to trains for liquidation camps.  You guys and your fucking human rights laws...

Posted
28 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

I'm no Democrat.  But I helped Team Biden all I could in 2020 for the very simple reason that bundling money and turning out voters for him was morally easier than taking his extreme 1/3rd (25mm voters) on to trains for liquidation camps.  You guys and your fucking human rights laws...

You applied the bandaid when the country needed the cure ...

caddyshack-danny.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Posted

As I've stated before, I agree with one portion of the "Democrats are Pussies" narrative.  Most of them simply do not have the stones nor the horses for the Final Solution to the Maga Question.  It is genuinely difficult and gut-wrenching to have people killed.  But once you get over the first few, the next few million are merely a statistic.  This whole thing, it doesn't end in a courtroom or a ballot box.  It ends in a mass grave. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

With spots in line going by auction- one throw each?

I was thinking we get a couple of kids out there for student debt relief two handing passes.  Maybe Dr. Pepper could sponsor it, they do after all, have experience.  

  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...