Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Surely the teachers can also talk about how every judge to review such "discrepancies," including Trump appointees, found the claims bullshit, right?

I’m kind of curious what they intend to teach, considering that election is considered the most secure in our history. Guess they’ll just follow Dotard’s lead and just make shit up.
Posted
Surely the teachers can also talk about how every judge to review such "discrepancies," including Trump appointees, found the claims bullshit, right?
I'd be for this curriculum as long as it would be a clear presentation of the bullshit lies & conspiracy theories which would then be disproven one by one with unassailable facts & data.
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Did Grover Cleveland travel every weekend in the statue of liberty? Was it gifted to his “presidential library” so he can continue using it every weekend to golf? It’s a fucking monument. 

They had orgies once a month in an alcove behind her right breast. Supposedly the buffet was amazing 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SquishMitten said:

This seems beyond hypocritical considering everything else that’s going on, but I’m not sure this is something we’d get crazy up in arms about on a normal timeline. At least on the surface level, it sounds a bit like witness protection for some of the higher up dudes to roll on others without fear of their family members being disemboweled and hung from bridges.

This is what it actually is:

 

I hate to do the "imagine if a Dem did this" thing, but jesus fucking christ imagine the years-long shitfit mainstream media would throw if a Dem did this. Jake Tapper would literally never shut the fuck up about it. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

This is what it actually is:

 

I hate to do the "imagine if a Dem did this" thing, but jesus fucking christ imagine the years-long shitfit mainstream media would throw if a Dem did this. Jake Tapper would literally never shut the fuck up about it. 

 

Seems a very odd thing.  They walked across the border at TJ with suitcases?  

Posted (edited)

https://www.13abc.com/2025/05/13/man-burns-100-library-books-jewish-african-american-lgbtq-topics-officials-say/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKRkapleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHtgMs6YlTfWXxvlQ_ggnJbYNAaVLx5n-XV1I8ipGW9OvhG0ZJBe-LB_-HjZM_aem_ZHQL0j0K5L6CTVQ17YdSCw

Quote

Ohio Sen. Kent Smith said the subjects of the books were reportedly on Jewish history, African American history and LGBTQ+ education.

 

The Beachwood Police Department reported the man checked out the books from the Beachwood Branch of the Cuyahoga County Public Library.

 

Later, the man reportedly posted a video of himself burning the books on social media.

Well, of course, we progress to actually burning books thanks to normalizing the rhetoric of the far right extremists.

Edited by pacman
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

This is what it actually is:

 

I hate to do the "imagine if a Dem did this" thing, but jesus fucking christ imagine the years-long shitfit mainstream media would throw if a Dem did this. Jake Tapper would literally never shut the fuck up about it. 

 

Pretty sure this was the plot of Sicario

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

I hate every fucking dumbass liberal that tried to hype her up over the years with a fiery passion

that musta been elsewhere because ana was the only one doing it around here and not a lib. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

that musta been elsewhere because ana was the only one doing it around here and not a lib. 

Here not so much but she was quite popular among Dems for a time, especially circa 2020 when she was mostly falling in line.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Here not so much but she was quite popular among Dems for a time, especially circa 2020 when she was mostly falling in line.

A coworker of mine loved her. This was 2017-18. Same guy that tried to get me listen to Jordan Peterson while talking about how great he was. Dude is of course MAGA as shit.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

I hate every fucking dumbass liberal that tried to hype her up over the years with a fiery passion

You’re a misogynist /ana

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)

I only recall some "libertarian" types that liked her. I don't recall thinking much about her at all but I assume she was at least a traditional democrat at some point. I only recall hearing about her when she starting saying weird shit for a dem and never heard any liberal support thereafter, if ever.

Edited by 'stache
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I only recall some "libertarian" types that liked her. I don't recall thinking much about her at all but I assume she was at least a traditional democrat at some point. I only recall hearing about her when she starting saying weird shit for a dem and never heard any liberal support thereafter, if ever.

Yup.  I just remember wanting to play with her boobies but otherwise don’t remember any libs hyping her up.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

Here not so much but she was quite popular among Dems for a time, especially circa 2020 when she was mostly falling in line.

She tried to position herself left of Bernie IIRC which is hilarious now. Also the super peace candidate.

But I don't recall her getting much traction among the normie Democrats.

Edited by Valmy77
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

it's wild to me what is considered "liberal" these days. pretty much anything left of the kkk, it seems

I just like to differentiate between what's considered "liberal" in America vs. what an actual leftist is. Liberals in American can be as right wing as conservatives about many things.

Posted
3 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

I hate every fucking dumbass liberal that tried to hype her up over the years with a fiery passion

No liberals ever gave a fuck about Tulsi Gabbard other than decrying her as a Russian asset or Assad puppet 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

No liberals ever gave a fuck about Tulsi Gabbard other than decrying her as a Russian asset or Assad puppet 

This is just cope and demonstrably untrue. She was fairly popular among Democrats until the Assad/Russia shit came up during the 2020 presidential campaigns and Hillary started going after her hard. Even after that she was pretty heavily defended by mainstream media and a lot of mainstream Democrats. Shit started going downhill for her and it culminated in her not being invited to the 2020 DNC which I'm sure is what started her off on the path to leaving the party.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

Here not so much but she was quite popular among Dems for a time, especially circa 2020 when she was mostly falling in line.

Sad but true. She even served as a co chair of the DNC for a time.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

This is just cope and demonstrably untrue. She was fairly popular among Democrats until the Assad/Russia shit came up during the 2020 presidential campaigns and Hillary started going after her hard. Even after that she was pretty heavily defended by mainstream media and a lot of mainstream Democrats. Shit started going downhill for her and it culminated in her not being invited to the 2020 DNC which I'm sure is what started her off on the path to leaving the party.

no, what he said is true. no liberal gave a shit about her at any point. democrats and others have proven time and time again they are not liberals

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

no, what he said is true. no liberal gave a shit about her at any point. democrats and others have proven time and time again they are not liberals

I try not to laugh hysterically whenever I hear a Clinton referred to as liberal.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

Needs to be noted that it’s almost cliche in intelligence studies that the Soviet collection and analysis apparatus was incredibly effective and good and then it all got filtered for ideological purity and became worthless. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Schulz2.0 said:

A coworker of mine loved her. This was 2017-18. Same guy that tried to get me listen to Jordan Peterson while talking about how great he was. Dude is of course MAGA as shit.

Really eerie how prescient many normie libs were in identifying the incel/fashy tendencies of the Bernie bro movement. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Needs to be noted that it’s almost cliche in intelligence studies that the Soviet collection and analysis apparatus was incredibly effective and good and then it all got filtered for ideological purity and became worthless. 

Ideology or Trumpology?  I have a tough time calling anything Trump/MAGA subscribe to as an ideology.  I guess ideologies don't have to be consistent or coherent.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted

I never met a Tulsi fan who wasn't a weird, contrarian, closeted libertarian. I don't know how anyone back in the 2020 primary could've listened to her speak for more than three minutes and think to themselves "wow, she's presidential." The least surprising thing was her leaving the party.

I say this as someone who hates the Democratic party. She's one of the few people for whom the party, which is good for nothing, is too good for.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ideology or Trumpology?  I have a tough time calling anything Trump/MAGA subscribe to as an ideology.  I guess ideologies don't have to be consistent or coherent.

Few ideologies really are. There has emerged one on the foreign policy front: neo-isolationism militarily, neo-mercantilism economically, and a willingness to use diplomatic tools to advance right-wing populism and nationalism in the Western world, transactional everywhere else. 

Its not one that he will apply coherently or that he formed, but that is what coalesced among his viziers. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Few ideologies really are. There has emerged one on the foreign policy front: neo-isolationism militarily, neo-mercantilism economically, and a willingness to use diplomatic tools to advance right-wing populism and nationalism in the Western world, transactional everywhere else. 

Its not one that he will apply coherently or that he formed, but that is what coalesced among his viziers. 

I am aware that Haspel soft-pedaled Russian intelligence to Trump because he'd get pissed when it pertained to election and cultural interference here or elsewhere.  And then Haspel, in turn, roasted Russia House regularly.

I'm reading a spy novel where a political Director and DDO are feeding a Russian double agent's Intel to the White House, where it is loved.  And the double agent is also running a mole in the CIA, whose identity has yet to be revealed.  I'm going with the DDO, but that may be too obvious.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
21 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Apparently KKKristi is now asking the government for an additional Gulfstream 5 for her personal use.

Not the first time either. https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2021/08/05/south-dakota-governor-kristi-noem-plane/5505956001/

She has a luxury travel problem. https://www.yahoo.com/news/kristi-noem-refused-financed-her-040042859.html

Also a fun article about ICE Barbie's cosplay.  https://www.thedailybeast.com/now-ice-barbie-kristi-noem-wants-her-own-brand-new-50m-private-jet/

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Satchel said:

Sad but true. She even served as a co chair of the DNC for a time.

And we all know what an estimable position that is, a sure sign of a rising star within the party.

I had to Google it. The current chair of the DNC is Ken Martin. First I’ve heard of him. I’ve heard more about vice chair David Hogg whose name is well known but I’d say he’s far from being a rising star in the party and his political future is uncertain.

You could find supporters of anyone in the Democratic Party including Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema. I’m not sure Tulsi ever had more going for her than that she wasn’t a constant thorn in the side of the party’s policy agenda like they were. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

I’m not sure Tulsi ever had more going for her than that she wasn’t a constant thorn in the side of the party’s policy agenda like they were. 

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Like, I cannot fucking stand Tulsi, but the revisionist history comparing her to some random DNC chair you've never heard of is insane.

She was the first woman combat veteran to run for President and was initially seen/presented herself as a progressive, anti-war, populist candidate. She got the most online engagement of any candidate in the debates she participated in. She was even presenting herself as anti-cop by going after Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor (which, truth be told, is probably the most commendable thing she ever did).

Obviously her carefully crafted image turned out to be bullshit. She's nothing more than a political opportunist, and she's a weird cult member who is likely some level of Russian asset, but she had a fair amount of momentum in the very beginning before the greater Democrat apparatus quickly turned against her after Hillary Clinton started shitting on her, and even then a bunch of prominent Democrats were defending her all over mainstream news. She was also getting glazed up a bunch by Joe Rogan which only helped her popularity.



×
×
  • Create New...