Jump to content

The GQP: Trumpist Death Cult


Hugo Stiglitz

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

How is it that you can get to places from either direction on a flat earth?  Is there some sort pac-man teleportation that you can’t detect going on?  Seems like a compass would be able to sniff that phenomenon out. 

Courteney Cox Of Course GIF by PBS SoCal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not one astronaut in 60 years has come back and said “Damndest thing…. Earth is actually flat. Crazy huh?”

I guess they’re all in on it too. As are their cameras when they point them at the Earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

How is it that you can get to places from either direction on a flat earth?  Is there some sort pac-man teleportation that you can’t detect going on?  Seems like a compass would be able to sniff that phenomenon out. 

It's because the flat earth is suspended on the backs of four enormous elephants (Berilia, Tubul, Great T'Phon, and Jerakeen), who themselves are riding on the back of a Great Star Turtle named The Great A'Tuin, and there is magic involved.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

You just have to ask the simplest question you can in plain spoken, uncombative language that makes it sound like you have never heard of the conspiracy but ...

And here's what I just can't do.  I can't.  The rage overtakes me every time.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

It's because the flat earth is suspended on the backs of four enormous elephants (Berilia, Tubul, Great T'Phon, and Jerakeen), who themselves are riding on the back of a Great Star Turtle named The Great A'Tuin, and there is magic involved.

 

Ok, now you're just making shit up

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pato del Muerto said:

How is it that you can get to places from either direction on a flat earth?  Is there some sort pac-man teleportation that you can’t detect going on?  Seems like a compass would be able to sniff that phenomenon out. 

5uoe_m.gif.2cd849d5863b228b4bc53f411e9ae455.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

Having known two of them, both of whom have flown overseas, if you start to question their beliefs and point out that they’ve flown tens of thousands of feet up, they will just babble aBout the windows being curved, or that we are “seeing what They want us to see” (apparently some display technology that consumers don’t yet have).  And if challenged to do their own research and build a balloon and go up themselves they get pissy.  

It’s mental illness and a need to be contrarian.

Commanded to love your neighbor as you love yourself becomes manifest in a belief that untold numbers of thei neighbors are complicit in a conspiracy to defy truth. I mean, holy shit. How fucked up is that? Especially so, given the utter lack of data to support those beliefs. 

I guess such deception is something they know is in their toolbox.

” I’ve already been forgiven.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

Commanded to love your neighbor as you love yourself becomes manifest in a belief that untold numbers of thei neighbors are complicit in a conspiracy to defy truth.

How much we put up with crazy depends on how attractive the neighbor is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could go any number of places, but we know who the majority of these people are voting for.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/raw-milk-sales-spike-despite-cdcs-warnings-of-risk-associated-with-bird-flu

Sales of raw milk appear to be on the rise, despite years of warnings about the health risks of drinking the unpasteurized products — and an outbreak of bird flu in dairy cows.

Since March 25, when the bird flu virus was confirmed in U.S. cattle for the first time, weekly sales of raw cow’s milk have ticked up 21% to as much as 65% compared with the same periods a year ago, according to the market research firm NielsenIQ.

That runs counter to advice from the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which calls raw milk one of the “riskiest” foods people can consume.

“Raw milk can be contaminated with harmful germs that can make you very sick,” the CDC says on its website.
As of Monday, at least 42 herds in nine states are known to have cows infected with the virus known as type A H5N1, federal officials said.

The virus has been found in high levels in the raw milk of infected cows. Viral remnants have been found in samples of milk sold in grocery stores, but the FDA said those products are safe to consume because pasteurization has been confirmed to kill the virus.

It’s not yet known whether live virus can be transmitted to people who consume milk that hasn’t been heat-treated.

But CDC officials warned last week that people who drink raw milk could theoretically become infected if the bird flu virus comes in contact with receptors in the nose, mouth and throat or by inhaling virus into the lungs. There’s also concern that if more people are exposed to the virus, it could mutate to spread more easily in people.

States have widely varying regulations regarding raw milk, with some allowing retail sales in stores and others allowing sale only at farms. Some states allow so-called cowshares, where people pay for milk from designated animals, and some allow consumption only by farm owners, employees or “non-paying guests.”

--

Still, testimonies to raw milk are trending on social media sites. And Mark McAfee, owner of Raw Farm USA in Fresno, California, says he can’t keep his unpasteurized products in stock.

“People are seeking raw milk like crazy,” he said, noting that no bird flu has been detected in his herds or in California. “Anything that the FDA tells our customers to do, they do the opposite.”

----

Before milk standards were adopted in 1924, about 25% of foodborne illnesses in the U.S. were related to dairy consumption, said Alex O’Brien, safety and quality coordinator for the Center for Dairy Research. Now, dairy products account for about 1% of such illnesses, he said.

“I liken drinking raw milk to playing Russian roulette,” O’Brien said. The more times people consume it, the greater the chance they’ll get sick, he added.

---

Despite the risks, about 4.4% of U.S. adults — nearly 11 million people — report that they drink raw milk at least once each year, and about 1% say they consume it each week, according to a 2022 FDA study.

Bonni Gilley, 75, of Fresno, said she has raised generations of her family on raw milk and unpasteurized cream and butter because she believes “it’s so healthy” and lacks additives.

Reports of bird flu in dairy cattle have not made her think twice about drinking raw milk, Gilley said.
“If anything, it is accelerating my thoughts about raw milk,” she said, partly because she doesn’t trust government officials.

Such views are part of a larger problem of government mistrust and a rejection of expertise, said Matthew Motta, who studies health misinformation at Boston University.

“It not that people are stupid or ignorant or that they don’t know what the science is,” he said. “They’re motivated to reject it on the basis of partisanship, their political ideology, their religion, their cultural values.”

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

This could go any number of places, but we know who the majority of these people are voting for.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/raw-milk-sales-spike-despite-cdcs-warnings-of-risk-associated-with-bird-flu

Sales of raw milk appear to be on the rise, despite years of warnings about the health risks of drinking the unpasteurized products — and an outbreak of bird flu in dairy cows.

Since March 25, when the bird flu virus was confirmed in U.S. cattle for the first time, weekly sales of raw cow’s milk have ticked up 21% to as much as 65% compared with the same periods a year ago, according to the market research firm NielsenIQ.

That runs counter to advice from the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which calls raw milk one of the “riskiest” foods people can consume.

“Raw milk can be contaminated with harmful germs that can make you very sick,” the CDC says on its website.
As of Monday, at least 42 herds in nine states are known to have cows infected with the virus known as type A H5N1, federal officials said.

The virus has been found in high levels in the raw milk of infected cows. Viral remnants have been found in samples of milk sold in grocery stores, but the FDA said those products are safe to consume because pasteurization has been confirmed to kill the virus.

It’s not yet known whether live virus can be transmitted to people who consume milk that hasn’t been heat-treated.

But CDC officials warned last week that people who drink raw milk could theoretically become infected if the bird flu virus comes in contact with receptors in the nose, mouth and throat or by inhaling virus into the lungs. There’s also concern that if more people are exposed to the virus, it could mutate to spread more easily in people.

States have widely varying regulations regarding raw milk, with some allowing retail sales in stores and others allowing sale only at farms. Some states allow so-called cowshares, where people pay for milk from designated animals, and some allow consumption only by farm owners, employees or “non-paying guests.”

--

Still, testimonies to raw milk are trending on social media sites. And Mark McAfee, owner of Raw Farm USA in Fresno, California, says he can’t keep his unpasteurized products in stock.

“People are seeking raw milk like crazy,” he said, noting that no bird flu has been detected in his herds or in California. “Anything that the FDA tells our customers to do, they do the opposite.”

----

Before milk standards were adopted in 1924, about 25% of foodborne illnesses in the U.S. were related to dairy consumption, said Alex O’Brien, safety and quality coordinator for the Center for Dairy Research. Now, dairy products account for about 1% of such illnesses, he said.

“I liken drinking raw milk to playing Russian roulette,” O’Brien said. The more times people consume it, the greater the chance they’ll get sick, he added.

---

Despite the risks, about 4.4% of U.S. adults — nearly 11 million people — report that they drink raw milk at least once each year, and about 1% say they consume it each week, according to a 2022 FDA study.

Bonni Gilley, 75, of Fresno, said she has raised generations of her family on raw milk and unpasteurized cream and butter because she believes “it’s so healthy” and lacks additives.

Reports of bird flu in dairy cattle have not made her think twice about drinking raw milk, Gilley said.
“If anything, it is accelerating my thoughts about raw milk,” she said, partly because she doesn’t trust government officials.

Such views are part of a larger problem of government mistrust and a rejection of expertise, said Matthew Motta, who studies health misinformation at Boston University.

“It not that people are stupid or ignorant or that they don’t know what the science is,” he said. “They’re motivated to reject it on the basis of partisanship, their political ideology, their religion, their cultural values.”

image.gif.8ea150c75d5a33cfeec7b5b107f9b253.gif

 

In case it wasn’t clear, I’m glad people are too stupid to understand what could kill them. This is Darwin in action. Please, continue. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 70S Show Lol GIF by IFC

Ben Carson, who is often named as a potential running mate for Donald Trump, is out with a new book in which he calls for an end to no-fault divorce laws in the U.S.

“For the sake of families, we should enact legislation to remove or radically reduce incidences of no-fault divorce,” Carson writes in “The Perilous Fight,” released Tuesday. 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Js1 said:

“For the sake of families, we should enact legislation to remove or radically reduce incidences of no-fault divorce,” Carson writes in “The Perilous Fight,” released Tuesday.

Keep going after abortion, divorce, contraception, etc. Republicans.  Please.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, crash_davis said:

Dumbest fucking people on the planet. This has to be a fucking joke.

Fuck you if you enable these idiots by voting for them.

 

https://minnesotareformer.com/2024/04/05/minnesota-republicans-introduce-legislation-inspired-by-the-chemtrails-conspiracy-theory/

Minnesota Republicans introduce legislation inspired by the chemtrails conspiracy theory

 

Republicans in the Legislature, including Senate assistant minority leader Justin Eichorn, R-Grand Rapids, have introduced legislation (HF4687/SF4630) inspired by the “chemtrails” conspiracy theory. 

The bill contains a mishmash of conspiratorial pseudoscience, including references to made-up phenomena like “xenobiotic electromagnetism and fields,” with just enough parroting of actual science to give it a veneer of credibility. 

It requires county sheriffs to investigate citizen complaints of “polluting atmospheric activity,” and grants the governor the authority to call up the National Guard and ground any aircraft suspected of spreading pollutants.

To professionals who study and understand atmospheric science, the legislation bears all the hallmarks of the “chemtrails” conspiracy theory, which posits that airplane exhaust is deliberately laced with harmful chemicals for various nefarious purposes, including forced sterilization and mind control.

“Because the text of this bill focuses so much on electromagnetic radiation, you can tell that it is coming from the community of people concerned with chemtrails,” said Holly Buck, who studies geoengineering at the University at Buffalo in New York.

Lawmakers in at least seven other states have introduced similar bills recently. While most have stalled in committee, a Tennessee bill recently sailed through the GOP-controlled House and Senate and awaits a signature or veto by the Republican governor there.

Sponsors in some of those states have explicitly referenced the chemtrails conspiracy in discussing the legislation.

“If you look at a thousand planes, you won’t see one (chemtrail). But then all of a sudden you see one,” the author of the Tennessee Senate bill told the Tennessee Lookout last month. “So we’re just asking the question: Are they putting anything in the air that could be toxic?”

The Minnesota House version of the bill was authored by GOP Rep. Jeff Dotseth of Kettle River and co-sponsored by Reps. Pam Altendorf of Red Wing, Dawn Gillman of Dassel and Krista Knudson of Lake Shore.

The Senate version was authored by GOP Sen. Eric Lucero of Saint Michael and co-sponsored by Sens. Glenn Gruenhagen of Glencoe, Bruce Anderson of Buffalo, Nathan Wesenberg of Little Falls and Eichorn, the assistant minority leader.

Some of the language in the bill is nonsensical.

“I don’t think xenobiotic electromagnetism and fields is a thing — it doesn’t even make sense,” Buck said.

The lead authors of both chambers’ bills did not respond to a request to define “xenobiotic electromagnetism,” or to provide a real-world example of it.

Among other things, the legislation seeks to ban “weather-engineering, cloud-seeding, stratospheric aerosol injection, or other atmospheric activity that is harmful to humans or the environment” as well as the emission of “xenobiotic agents” and “excessive electromagnetic radiation.”

It requires local law enforcement to “encourage” the public to monitor “polluting atmospheric activities” and report them to authorities. If any such report is made, county sheriffs and commissioners must follow up and investigate, “without limitation.”

It further instructs sheriffs and county commissioners to order the grounding of any aircraft suspected of engaging in “weather-engineering or other atmospheric experimentation that involves releasing xenobiotic agents or producing electromagnetic radiation at harmful levels.”

The bill also gives the governor the authority to call up the National Guard and ground any aircraft suspected of engaging in “prohibited activity.”

Taken at face value the legislation could ban all air traffic in the state, due to its apparent blanket prohibition on “polluting atmospheric activity” that is “harmful to humans or the environment.” Similarly worded legislation in other states has been shot down over concerns about the effects on agricultural operators, ethanol producers, radio and TV broadcasters, and other industries.

The bill has no chance of becoming law under a DFL trifecta and is highly unlikely to even receive a hearing. But the support of multiple Republican members, including a member of leadership, gives a sense of how the party might govern were it to return to power.

Lol. You think it's a joke but MN is just copying a bill that I believe actually passed in Tennessee. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68716894

19 hours ago, Willfully Horn said:

^^^^Good stuff.

Now I would like to hear from a flat earther. How high do you have to get before you can see the entirety of the flat Earth? 
 

Which reminds me, yet again, how evangelicals (because flat earthers are most often evangelicals) love their neighbors by believing overwhelming numbers of their neighbors are part of a conspiracy against God.

This one is too fucking easy, so I'll happily field it: They never loved their neighbors in the first place. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

This could go any number of places, but we know who the majority of these people are voting for.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/raw-milk-sales-spike-despite-cdcs-warnings-of-risk-associated-with-bird-flu

Sales of raw milk appear to be on the rise, despite years of warnings about the health risks of drinking the unpasteurized products — and an outbreak of bird flu in dairy cows.

Since March 25, when the bird flu virus was confirmed in U.S. cattle for the first time, weekly sales of raw cow’s milk have ticked up 21% to as much as 65% compared with the same periods a year ago, according to the market research firm NielsenIQ.

That runs counter to advice from the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which calls raw milk one of the “riskiest” foods people can consume.

“Raw milk can be contaminated with harmful germs that can make you very sick,” the CDC says on its website.
As of Monday, at least 42 herds in nine states are known to have cows infected with the virus known as type A H5N1, federal officials said.

The virus has been found in high levels in the raw milk of infected cows. Viral remnants have been found in samples of milk sold in grocery stores, but the FDA said those products are safe to consume because pasteurization has been confirmed to kill the virus.

It’s not yet known whether live virus can be transmitted to people who consume milk that hasn’t been heat-treated.

But CDC officials warned last week that people who drink raw milk could theoretically become infected if the bird flu virus comes in contact with receptors in the nose, mouth and throat or by inhaling virus into the lungs. There’s also concern that if more people are exposed to the virus, it could mutate to spread more easily in people.

States have widely varying regulations regarding raw milk, with some allowing retail sales in stores and others allowing sale only at farms. Some states allow so-called cowshares, where people pay for milk from designated animals, and some allow consumption only by farm owners, employees or “non-paying guests.”

--

Still, testimonies to raw milk are trending on social media sites. And Mark McAfee, owner of Raw Farm USA in Fresno, California, says he can’t keep his unpasteurized products in stock.

“People are seeking raw milk like crazy,” he said, noting that no bird flu has been detected in his herds or in California. “Anything that the FDA tells our customers to do, they do the opposite.”

----

Before milk standards were adopted in 1924, about 25% of foodborne illnesses in the U.S. were related to dairy consumption, said Alex O’Brien, safety and quality coordinator for the Center for Dairy Research. Now, dairy products account for about 1% of such illnesses, he said.

“I liken drinking raw milk to playing Russian roulette,” O’Brien said. The more times people consume it, the greater the chance they’ll get sick, he added.

---

Despite the risks, about 4.4% of U.S. adults — nearly 11 million people — report that they drink raw milk at least once each year, and about 1% say they consume it each week, according to a 2022 FDA study.

Bonni Gilley, 75, of Fresno, said she has raised generations of her family on raw milk and unpasteurized cream and butter because she believes “it’s so healthy” and lacks additives.

Reports of bird flu in dairy cattle have not made her think twice about drinking raw milk, Gilley said.
“If anything, it is accelerating my thoughts about raw milk,” she said, partly because she doesn’t trust government officials.

Such views are part of a larger problem of government mistrust and a rejection of expertise, said Matthew Motta, who studies health misinformation at Boston University.

“It not that people are stupid or ignorant or that they don’t know what the science is,” he said. “They’re motivated to reject it on the basis of partisanship, their political ideology, their religion, their cultural values.”

It apparently gets dumber than consuming raw milk. Some of these fuckers are actively seeking raw milk WITH H5N1, aka bird flu. These are the same fuckers who vehemently refuse vaccines.

https://futurism.com/neoscope/raw-milk-enthusiasts-demand-milk-infected-avian-flu-h5n1

Quote

Raw milk enthusiasts are dead set on exposing themselves to the H5N1 aviary flu virus by drinking contaminated and unpasteurized cow milk, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Mark McAfee, who founded the Raw Milk Institute, told the newspaper that he's been getting inundated with calls from "customers asking for H5N1 milk because they want immunity from it."

It's a bizarre reality that flies in the face of a wealth of scientific evidence. We've known about pasteurization's ability to fend off germs and other pathogens for well over 100 years.

But that hasn't stopped a group of raw milk enthusiasts from seeking out untreated dairy in their search for purported immune system benefits.

It's an especially foolish idea considering there's a lot we still don't know about the current spread of the H5N1 virus. The first incident of the virus breaking out in dairy cows in the US was reported in March. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there have been infections in mammals across Asia, North America, South America, and Europe.

While scientists suspect it may be possible for the virus to be transmitted from mammal to mammal, the risk to humans is still not entirely understood. Given the wide geographic spread, the CDC suggests there could be an "increase in sporadic human infections resulting from bird and animal exposures," but that "the current risk to the general public from bird flu viruses is low."

In other words, intentionally seeking out being infected by the virus by drinking raw milk — something the CDC expressly advises against — is a bad idea.

"Deliberating consuming raw milk in the hope of becoming immune to avian influenza is playing Russian roulette with your health," UC Davis researcher Michael Payne told the LA Times. "Deliberately trying to infect yourself with a known pathogen flies in the face of all medical knowledge and common sense."

\The virus was detected in 36 dairy cattle herds across nine US states, but scientists have yet to find any evidence of the virus surviving in any pasteurized milk samples.

So far, there's been one case of a dairy worker in Texas who was infected. His symptoms didn't extend beyond a moderate case of pink eye.

"Every time it gets a new mammalian host species, like cows, there’s more risk of human transmission and reduced human immunity," Boston University environmental epidemiologist Jessica Leibler told Nature.

One study also examined dead barn cats at dairies in Texas and Kansas that were infected by the virus, suggesting that raw milk may be dangerous to other mammals. The research is similar to another study in which cats were infected with the virus.

"While there have been no known cases of human transmission of H5N1 from raw milk, it’s certainly conceivable that it could happen, and this is a highly fatal virus not just for cats but for humans too," said American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases chair Sean O'Leary said in a recent statement.

In short, drinking raw dairy milk is as bad of an idea as ever. While we still don't know the exact risks involved, it's an extremely ill-advised way to become immune — if that's even possible in the first place.

 

Edited by C-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I guess this goes here, what an asshole.

image.thumb.png.e23d3e826409fec23bfa53ea39d459a7.png

In the next breath it's "THERE'S A MARRIAGE CRISIS!!!!"

Women want to get married.  They just don't want to marry you.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

In the next breath it's "THERE'S A MARRIAGE CRISIS!!!!"

Women want to get married.  They just don't want to marry you.

I just cannot comprehend how their brains are entirely incapable of understanding that not everyone is the same. Yeah, there are still women who prefer this lifestyle, and I’m not going to judge if that’s genuinely what they want out of life. But lots of women like having independence and the ability to think for themselves, or equality of opinion with a marriage or relationship. Respect that too assholes!

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just cannot comprehend how their brains are entirely incapable of understanding that not everyone is the same. Yeah, there are still women who prefer this lifestyle, and I’m not going to judge if that’s genuinely what they want out of life. But lots of women like having independence and the ability to think for themselves, or equality of opinion with a marriage or relationship. Respect that too assholes!


And in so many cases it's men preaching to women about what women should find fulfilling or should want.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Shut up and kick.

Chris Kluwe got cut for speaking out in favor of marriage equality. Kapernick got black balled for kneeling in protest of how black Americans were treated by police

Nothing will happen to Buttlicker

National Fascist League 

Edited by Js1
  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, C-Man said:

It apparently gets dumber than consuming raw milk. Some of these fuckers are actively seeking raw milk WITH H5N1, aka bird flu. These are the same fuckers who vehemently refuse vaccines.

Putting aside that they are thinking they will build their immunity up, I wonder how many of the raw milk sellers (here in Texas it’s only sold legally at the farm I believe) are claiming their dairy cows have H5N1 in order to boost sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hornius Emeritus said:


And in so many cases it's men preaching to women about what women should find fulfilling or should want.

Still, some tradwife creators appear to be popular if you look at their follower counts, and they certainly generate a lot of chatter. But I often think: Who is this content really for? Sure, some portion of their followers are probably like-minded women, but a new study from Media Matters made me wonder if the tradwife’s main audience is actually right-leaning men:

Media Matters coded and analyzed 327 recommended videos after exclusively interacting with tradwife content and documented what happened. We found TikTok’s recommendation algorithm rapidly populated our F.Y.P. [For You page] with conspiracy theory content and fearmongering, which made up nearly one-third of all videos served to the F.Y.P.

After interacting with tradwives, the study found, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm also served up “19 videos featuring extremist right-wing media figures,” such as Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/15/opinion/tradwife-tiktok.html

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just cannot comprehend how their brains are entirely incapable of understanding that not everyone is the same. Yeah, there are still women who prefer this lifestyle, and I’m not going to judge if that’s genuinely what they want out of life. But lots of women like having independence and the ability to think for themselves, or equality of opinion with a marriage or relationship. Respect that too assholes!

Autonomy.  What a concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Still, some tradwife creators appear to be popular if you look at their follower counts, and they certainly generate a lot of chatter. But I often think: Who is this content really for? Sure, some portion of their followers are probably like-minded women, but a new study from Media Matters made me wonder if the tradwife’s main audience is actually right-leaning men:

Media Matters coded and analyzed 327 recommended videos after exclusively interacting with tradwife content and documented what happened. We found TikTok’s recommendation algorithm rapidly populated our F.Y.P. [For You page] with conspiracy theory content and fearmongering, which made up nearly one-third of all videos served to the F.Y.P.

After interacting with tradwives, the study found, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm also served up “19 videos featuring extremist right-wing media figures,” such as Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/15/opinion/tradwife-tiktok.html

 

Based on this, I'm 100% convinced Pimphand/Zeus/PRONGHORN/GRhorn all follow tradwife shit. Can y'all imagine the horror show their feeds must be?

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C-Man said:

Some of these fuckers are actively seeking raw milk WITH H5N1, aka bird flu.

Please please tell me the venn diagram showing these morons and the "mah rights!?" antivaxxers is an overlapping circle.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Still, some tradwife creators appear to be popular if you look at their follower counts, and they certainly generate a lot of chatter. But I often think: Who is this content really for? Sure, some portion of their followers are probably like-minded women, but a new study from Media Matters made me wonder if the tradwife’s main audience is actually right-leaning men:

Media Matters coded and analyzed 327 recommended videos after exclusively interacting with tradwife content and documented what happened. We found TikTok’s recommendation algorithm rapidly populated our F.Y.P. [For You page] with conspiracy theory content and fearmongering, which made up nearly one-third of all videos served to the F.Y.P.

After interacting with tradwives, the study found, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm also served up “19 videos featuring extremist right-wing media figures,” such as Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/15/opinion/tradwife-tiktok.html

I'm stunned. Shocked.

image.png.08273c1d6424adeddcb7028a0b28c07e.png

9 minutes ago, bolverk said:

 

Based on this, I'm 100% convinced Pimphand/Zeus/PRONGHORN/GRhorn all follow tradwife shit. Can y'all imagine the horror show their feeds must be?

Yeah, I can fucking imagine it, becuase those fucking donkeys share that shit over here all the fucking time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 'stache said:

I guess this goes here, what an asshole.

image.thumb.png.e23d3e826409fec23bfa53ea39d459a7.png

I like how he told men to get off the internet and quit looking at porn and playing video games.

Oh, wait.  What?  He didn't tell men anything at all?

Women really like it when men tell them what to do and how to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...