Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, UpperWestside said:

Usually that means starting a new shooting war against some country that has a military roughly as strong as the corps of cadets at aggy. 

acsejz.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Stupid question amnesty: If Trump selectively ordered investigations into Democrats that appear in the Epstein files and an active investigation is the planned excuse that that information can't be released, won't that have the opposite of the intended effect?

"Well, we can't release any information pertaining to ongoing investigations, so here's all the Republicans."

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

Pretty much everything he does is goes to keep ramping up the pressure on him.  His crazies aren't letting this go short of a full release.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Stupid question amnesty: If Trump selectively ordered investigations into Democrats that appear in the Epstein files and an active investigation is the planned excuse that that information can't be released, won't that have the opposite of the intended effect?

"Well, we can't release any information pertaining to ongoing investigations, so here's all the Republicans."

cleveland cavaliers love GIF by NBPA

1 minute ago, kevwun said:

 His crazies aren't letting this go short of a full release.

It has to be done by December 19th.

We've already had over 30,000 pages released (most from his estate) and we know the DOJ has a much larger number of files.

Anything held back is going to ramp up the crazies. And the DOJ can't release a few hundred redacted files, as the AP says:

Quote

However, the law also makes clear that no records shall be withheld or redacted — meaning certain parts are blacked out — solely because their release would cause embarrassment or reputational harm to any public figure, government official or foreign dignitary.

Mike Johnson and Co. really fucked up.  Trump is going to go against the law just passed and try to hold back a lot, but it'll be the Streisand Effect on acid.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

I mean...yeah. I am not interested in protecting any of Epstein's buddies. And color me skeptical any Democrat I actually like is in those files. Probably a bunch of old creeps we were planning on trying to defeat in a primary anyway.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

I mean...yeah. I am not interested in protecting any of Epstein's buddies. And color me skeptical any Democrat I actually like is in those files. Probably a bunch of old creeps we were planning on trying to defeat in a primary anyway.

This pretty much sums it up:

bafkreic7bcowt4itux5r7vbyp6i3bjiigfpjvtn

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Anybody with a brain has known Trump was doing creepy crap with Epstein. He was a known rapist and creep back before he was a political figure. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
11 minutes ago, Underdog said:

Walked in on young girls getting dressed at a pageant. Nope. No signs of creepiness there. 

The vast majority of people, when asked "What is the youngest you would have sex with?" would recoil from the question. "That's really gross", or something. Trump's answer? "Well I wouldn't have sex with a 12 year-old". That is disgusting enough, but knowing Trump like we all unfortunately do now, that translates to "I would have sex with a 12 year-old but I wouldn't want it known." 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
5 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

All they want to cover and, therefore, everything they want to see is part of the political horserace. The premise of the question is, "surely you see the world as I do, that is merely blows dealt and received by the Dems and GOPs." It passes for subtlety among the meat puppets on the TV.

So intellectually vacant and narrowly focused coverage of the news has, IMHO, promoted the transformation of American politics into the NFL. Particularly, obviously, for the right.



×
×
  • Create New...