Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

no issue with rausch or cuoco at 1, depending on general taste or current wants. But I think it’s ok to go ahead and award blossom the bronze of the group. 

Blossom might come in at 4.  Wait, what was the question?

  • Haha 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Kaley Cuoco is your second choice in that group? Fascinating…

What can I say, cute women in glasses do it for me.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Note to self, copyright 'Deconstructed Placenta' for new band name/events centre for baby showers gone awry.  

Kaley has the better ass but the other chick has a cuter face and better tits.  Either way, threesome made in heaven.  

Speaking of threesome, Eric just got his third extra 21 chromosome fixed.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Pet peeve: please don’t use semicolons simply to connect 2 independent clauses. Do you think your reader’ brains really process it any differently than a period? Save them for clauses that need a conjunctive adverb to facilitate transition. 

6 hours ago, Jiggy-Z said:

I forgot what this thread was about.....originally.

The thread was about some guy raiding the RNC’s coffers; because the RNC is hurting for money.  

Remember, the RNC is supposed to be helping three groups; Trump/Noem, Congressional Republicans, and state officials (governors, etc,) and state legislatures.

Posted
6 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Maybe the part where he planned it, picked the target, picked the time, provided the weapons and transportation to the home played some minor part in that. 

There was also that thing instead of telling his followers to “be there, it will be wild”, he said, “go kill these people”.

Suspicious Monkey GIF by MOODMAN

6 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Most states follow the felony murder doctrine.  Each state can adopt its own flavor.  Which means you can be convicted of first-degree murder in some states, and avoid a murder conviction entirely in other states for the same conduct.  It is almost like the actual state laws play a part in the criminal trial. 

all stars lol GIF by Lifetime

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 4/5/2024 at 5:35 PM, tx 3 putt said:

Future lawsuits ….

 

We laugh at something increasingly unfunny. 

There never has been a movement in the US that called itself woke-ism, yet tens of millions of Americans are called to action in hatred of that movement. It's the best object for hate and fear since they started mischaracterizing liberalism.

It's the worst object of their hate as being woke mostly refers to being tolerant and empathetic. To me, this is the leap to Nazism only likely worse. The Nazis focused their unthinkable hatred and punishment on groups that could be identiffied as something. Jews, gays, gypsies (the Romani). 

There is no clear identity of the woke-ist. Just hunt down the ones that don't support the Chosen Lies or hate the Chosen Evil. This is more akin to the Red Scare when casual accusation could ruin a person.

We've got a serious white man problem.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
On 4/6/2024 at 3:43 PM, Gatorubet said:

If he wins because the majority of the voting populous is so stupid they will vote for him no matter what the truth - or the clear lies and hate pouring out of his mouth - then the reason would be “democracy”.

if the latter, then people opposing that election would be the insurrectionists.

This is really good, @Gatorubet

It's the black hole at the end of "every accusation is a confession."

Posted
13 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

We laugh at something increasingly unfunny. 

There never has been a movement in the US that called itself woke-ism, yet tens of millions of Americans are called to action in hatred of that movement. It's the best object for hate and fear since they started mischaracterizing liberalism.

It's the worst object of their hate as being woke mostly refers to being tolerant and empathetic. To me, this is the leap to Nazism only likely worse. The Nazis focused their unthinkable hatred and punishment on groups that could be identiffied as something. Jews, gays, gypsies (the Romani). 

There is no clear identity of the woke-ist. Just hunt down the ones that don't support the Chosen Lies or hate the Chosen Evil. This is more akin to the Red Scare when casual accusation could ruin a person.

We've got a serious white man problem.

358375658_581817720788552_90608409469078

  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)

I may have missed it in the punctuation talk but has the question come up about Cannon's latest "non-order"  where she fails to decide the law on the PRA after she asked both sides to submit the jury instructions?

Either the PRA applies to classified government documents or it does not (narrator: It does not) and that won't change mid-trial.  Is she granting Trump a lifeline that if they seat a jury and jeopardy attaches she can erroneously decide that the PRA applies and dismiss the case?  Why aren't we back to the 11th again?

Edited by TexasEd
  • Like 1
Posted
Yes, now is the exact correct time to bring up a change of venue.  Let’s take a month to think it over. 
I can’t keep it all straight. Didn’t Trump have a go at this before and was denied?
Posted
7 minutes ago, miguelito said:

Maybe, but now he's strenuously objecting.

 

“Really Serious Ex  Parte Motion to Strenuously Object Bigly to the trial being in state court in New York instead of in Fort Pierce, Florida in front of that federal woman I like because…… election interference.”

IMG_2537.gif.9bb94ab035f4fdac47c33ff914e1a1d5.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:
1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:
Yes, now is the exact correct time to bring up a change of venue.  Let’s take a month to think it over. 

I can’t keep it all straight. Didn’t Trump have a go at this before and was denied?

Just assume it’s normal. I’m sure whatever applies to regular people and lawyers acting in good faith applies here. 

  • Rage+1 3
Posted
1 hour ago, The Dog said:

Dammit!!! The fuckin’ courts let the rich and powerful get away with everything. This is just another example of they can do whatever they want and…….what?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Dammit!!! The fuckin’ courts let the rich and powerful get away with everything. This is just another example of they can do whatever they want and…….what?

Jennifer Lawrence Reaction GIF

Posted
19 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Dammit!!! The fuckin’ courts let the rich and powerful get away with everything. This is just another example of they can do whatever they want and…….what?

I mean, even lawyers could see the utter ridiculousness of this motion.  Just because one of the more egregious attempts to delay wasn’t granted doesn’t mean he’s not been the recipient of some extraordinarily lenient shit so far. 
 

Nevermind the triple negative there. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Biff Tannen said:

I mean, even lawyers could see the utter ridiculousness of this motion.  Just because one of the more egregious attempts to delay wasn’t granted doesn’t mean he’s not been the recipient of some extraordinarily lenient shit so far. 
 

Nevermind the triple negative there. 

Itemize for us the lenient shit he's gotten from Engoron's court.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Itemize for us the lenient shit he's gotten from Engoron's court.

Well for starters, he keeps threatening witnesses and judges and prosecutors , and also the bond thing and, um at church it's good girls. Or this place here where I'm going tonight, the black awareness rally it's gonna be some fine women there, good good clean girls  

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

Dammit!!! The fuckin’ courts let the rich and powerful get away with everything. This is just another example of they can do whatever they want and…….what?

we really need a sarcasm punctuation mark. I think we would avoid a lot of misinformation that way

Posted

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/08/politics/special-counsel-jack-smith-supreme-court-trump-immunity-claim/index.html
 

Quote

Special counsel Jack Smith urged the Supreme Court on Monday to reject Donald Trump’s claims of sweeping immunity and to deny the former president any opportunity to delay a trial on charges that he attempted to subvert the results of the 2020 election.

Trump’s position, Smith told the court, has no grounding in the Constitution, the nation’s history or Americans’ understanding that presidents are not above the law. Even if the Supreme Court finds that former presidents are entitled to some form of immunity, Smith asserted, at least some of Trump’s actions were private conduct – far removed from “official acts” – and could be prosecuted.

Quote

“The Framers never endorsed criminal immunity for a former President, and all Presidents from the Founding to the modern era have known that after leaving office they faced potential criminal liability for official acts,” Smith told the court.

Smith’s filing landed in what has emerged as the most closely watched case of the Supreme Court’s current term. A broad ruling for Trump could undermine not only the special counsel’s election subversion case, but a litany of other criminal charges pending against him.

Quote

The Supreme Court will hear arguments April 25, and a decision is expected by July. Trump’s written reply to Smith is due next week.

Smith attempted to bat away Trump’s argument that if a limited form of immunity for former presidents exists, that would require lower courts to review how that immunity might be applied in Trump’s case. If a majority of the justices went that route, it could significantly delay a trial.

Quote

But the special counsel asserted that many of Trump’s actions were private. The Constitution, he said, doesn’t give a president a role in certifying the election of his successor. So Trump’s efforts, Smith added, were part of “a private scheme with private actors to achieve a private end: petitioner’s effort to remain in power by fraud.”

Trump filed his own initial written arguments last month, claiming that future presidents would be vulnerable to “de facto blackmail and extortion while in office” if the court denied him immunity. Past presidents, he said, could have been charged for all sorts of controversial actions they took in office. Smith pushed back on that position in his latest brief.

Quote

“The effective functioning of the presidency does not require that a former president be immune from accountability for these alleged violations of federal criminal law,” Smith wrote Monday. “To the contrary, a bedrock principle of our constitutional order is that no person is above the law – including the president.”

In his filing last month, the presumptive 2024 GOP nominee had also floated an alternative route for the justices that would help him achieve the political goal of delaying a trial until after the November election – if they were unwilling to accept his maximalist theory of presidential immunity.

Quote

Under that scenario, the court could send the case back to lower courts for more proceedings – a move that would push off a trial for months – to determine whether any partial theory of immunity would apply in his case.

But Smith appeared eager to steer the court away from that outcome. Instead, he said that if the Supreme Court finds that former presidents are entitled to some immunity, a trial could get underway focused on Trump’s private actions.

Quote

“Even if the court were inclined to recognize some immunity for a former president’s official acts, it should remand for trial because the indictment alleges substantial private conduct in service of petitioner’s private aim,” Smith told the Supreme Court.

Trump’s “use of official power was merely an additional means of achieving a private aim – to perpetuate his term in office – that is prosecutable based on private conduct,” the special counsel argued.

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Corporations and Billionaires in America have been planning for this year for decades. Dumbing down the American population through public education funding cuts and neglect to get to this point to test if the populace is sufficiently ignorant and stupid enough to vote for it's own demise. 

The courts aren't equipped to save the country. It will all rest on the millions who vote, and in reality the thousands who vote in a few key states. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 6
Posted
11 hours ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

we really need a sarcasm punctuation mark. I think we would avoid a lot of misinformation that way

Punctuation discussion is not abating.

Posted
1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

Can no one stop their bickering long enough to think of and pray for poor Alina Abba?

It had been all this:

spacer.png

But, now, it's all this. 

spacer.png

I'm willing to donate to her gofundme onlyfans.

  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...