Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

(more fox news)

k.a. conway says that kamala made the big trade giving up on rural voters and going all in on white educated women, who already were voting dem from 1992-2020. someone told her to ignore georgia and other non-blue-wall states, and she's going all in there, which is a mistake, turning her back on so many voters.

ariz losses were largely due to confusing voting rules, "take your ballot to blah blah" i can't keep up.

she thinks trump wins bucks county (pa) because voter registration.

Thank you for your service, sir.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Js1 said:

The time to worry about that is in 2030, not 2024.  Not even 2028. 

Not if the hurricanes have anything to say about that.  And honestly, I'm good if we cut off disaster relief to FL going forward.

Posted
2 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

giving up on rural voters and going all in on white educated women, who already were voting dem from 1992-2020

Uh, okay.

You mean the rural voters who vote 80-20 for Trump and are a shrinking demographic?  While college educated women is a much bigger demo and growing. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, immamac said:

Dude I love you, but you are wrong as fuck. Trump is as extreme as extreme can possibly get it's not really even on the extremism meter that's how fucking out of bounds it is. Kamala is whatever, and the way she sees America moving forward maybe different than the way you see it, but she's not going to shit on the constitution, dismantle the checks and balances and ruin the entire foundation of what makes America, America to do it. That's the difference. 

I’m not freaking arguing Trump isn’t an extremist at all.  Just the fact that both parties have gone more away from center, that’s it.  Which with polls of democrats since Clinton have proved. The other side I don’t even need to quote articles to prove obviously. I don’t understand why wanting both parties to be more center is a bad thing. The fact you have people like @Dahobbs and @Brisketexan negging anything they don’t agree with kinda proves my point.  

Edited by Hook1997
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck You 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

i'm gonna spend the next 30 min or so watching fox news so you don't have to.

i'll be "live tweeting" my findings on here.

going in.

1st nugg from laura i - trump is the "energizer bunny of candidates" (because he did his rally last night then flew home to west palm).

thanks for your service, I can't wait go go over there at about 9 or 10 tonight for some schadenfreude.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, henrygandorf said:

conway chimes in and basically says this isn't about men/women/sexism, it's about what voters see and hear from kamala - "we paid attention, and she's awful"

Kellyanne, you truly have a dizzying intellect.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Hook1997 said:

I’m not freaking arguing Trump isn’t an extremist at all.  Just the fact that both parties have gone more away from center, that’s it.  Which with polls of democrats since Clinton have proved. The other side I don’t even need to quote articles to prove obviously. I don’t understand why wanting both parties to be more center is a bad thing. 

Reagan pushed the entire country right in the 80s. So much so that Clinton was conservative, even for a Democrat. This was a long overdue course correction. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
2 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

conway chimes in and basically says this isn't about men/women/sexism, it's about what voters see and hear from kamala - "we paid attention, and she's awful"

Meanwhile, WI GOP officials are freaking out about the gender gap

Even the GOP women have no idea what the average swing women voter thinks right now. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hook1997 said:

I’m not freaking arguing Trump isn’t an extremist at all.  Just the fact that both parties have gone more away from center, that’s it.  Which with polls of democrats since Clinton have proved. The other side I don’t even need to quote articles to prove obviously. I don’t understand why wanting both parties to be more center is a bad thing. 

Still having trouble with those things called facts I see. What policies are you referring to the Democratic side. Name one. Go. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
conway chimes in and basically says this isn't about men/women/sexism, it's about what voters see and hear from kamala - "we paid attention, and she's awful"

Lulz. She ran a virtually flawless campaign, even in this environment when D’s have to be perfect and it doesn’t matter wtf R’s do.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
28 minutes ago, Js1 said:

They are REALLY freaking out about turnout today

CLARK COUNTY NEVADA We need Republicans to vote today as we are UNDERPERFORMING significantly vs 2020 on Election Day. Do not get complacent with our early vote lead! R turnout in Clark is behind D turnout. At this same point in 2020, Rs had 41% of the Election Day vote - we are down to 33%. VOTE VOTE VOTE

These dumbasses are so bad at math they don't understand that telling their ghouls to only vote in person in 2020, and telling them the opposite this year, means they're going to have far less in person on election Day than in 2020. 

There's no one single extra voter for Trump this year than 4 years ago. A portion of his 2020 voters died from the pandemic or just old age. 

He's lost a lot of women, lost a lot of Puerto Ricans in a week, and is even losing some among men. There's no way enough uneducated black and Mexican-American men are going to make up the difference, especially in PA, WI, and MI. 

He's toast

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Uh, okay.

You mean the rural voters who vote 80-20 for Trump and are a shrinking demographic?  While college educated women is a much bigger demo and growing. 

 

I don't see the evidence for Kamala giving up on rural voters anyway. I have seen several pitches to them during her campaign by both Kamala and Walz.

But this is the second time I have heard this nonsense about Kamala going all in on women and ignoring everybody else. I haven't seen a single speech or campaign event she has done that was specifically for women only while I have seen several directed to rural voters.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Dr. Teeth said:

Shhhh! She’s a genius. We need more people like her. 

I really tried pushing that once, but MAGA is king of cognitive dissonance. it is "100% fraud!", but then they will immediately ask when is the next time they can vote, its not about reality but about their feelings, they are like a dog, if a dog could hate 24/7

Edited by linux
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Still having trouble with those things called facts I see. What policies are you referring to the Democratic side. Name one. Go. 

I think it is a vibes thing. Sure the Democrats sent a dude from the 1970s into office in 2020, but it just feels more radical.

Posted
Just now, Valmy77 said:

I don't see the evidence for Kamala giving up on rural voters anyway. I have seen several pitches to them during her campaign by both Kamala and Walz.

But this is the second time I have heard this nonsense about Kamala going all in on women and ignoring everybody else. I haven't seen a single speech or campaign event she has done that was specifically for women only while I have seen several directed to rural voters.

One of the things I saw earlier was that she hasn't repeatedly (that I can recall) brought up being the first woman president.  Or to use that as a reason to vote for her. 

Hillary talked about it a lot.  Yeah, her nomination was historic, but my god, her campaign did not shut up about it. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

I don't see the evidence for Kamala giving up on rural voters anyway. I have seen several pitches to them during her campaign by both Kamala and Walz.

But this is the second time I have heard this nonsense about Kamala going all in on women and ignoring everybody else. I haven't seen a single speech or campaign event she has done that was specifically for women only while I have seen several directed to rural voters.

During the Falcons game this week (no salt in wound intended) on the radio she had ads geared towards farmers.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Js1 said:

One of the things I saw earlier was that she hasn't repeatedly (that I can recall) brought up being the first woman president.  Or to use that as a reason to vote for her. 

Hillary talked about it a lot.  Yeah, her nomination was historic, but my god, her campaign did not shut up about it. 

I think it was a wise move to stick the the issues of the day, and not all the precedent breaking.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Celery Man said:

The guy who just helped me at ace hardware said he was for damn sure not going to cast a vote for Roy Cooper. His boss told him Cooper isn't on the ballot and what's his plan because he's closing tonight. Guy said "oh is it today"?

well, sounds like he was right.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Js1 said:

One of the things I saw earlier was that she hasn't repeatedly (that I can recall) brought up being the first woman president.  Or to use that as a reason to vote for her. 

Hillary talked about it a lot.  Yeah, her nomination was historic, but my god, her campaign did not shut up about it. 

She did a masterful job of putting the country in front of her and going people forward.

  • Hook 'Em 3


×
×
  • Create New...