Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
46 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

Lets see how things are going on Elon's hellsite

image.png.be4e74583ed43a902d87113b7ffd693a.png

 

also

 

that-escalated.gif

 

Wait is there a magat conspiracy that Israel was behind 9/11?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
  • Replies 32.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

https://gizmodo.com/gop-senator-introduces-bill-to-make-all-porn-a-federal-crime-following-project-2025-playbook-2000600994

 

Quote

Last year, the rightwing think-tank the Heritage Foundation launched Project 2025, which laid out much of the policy blueprint for the current Trump administration. One of the project’s espoused goals was to permanently criminalize all pornography. Now, a Republican senator with kind words for Trump has introduced a bill that would do just that.

 

Quote

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) recently introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would effectively criminalize all pornography nationwide by legally redefining what it means to be obscene. For years, “obscenity” has been all but a defunct legal category that narrowly defines speech that remains unprotected by the First Amendment. Lee would explode this legal category, expanding it to encompass virtually all visual representations of sex.

 

 

Quote

According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal. In other words, if you have an old VHS tape of some Cinemax-style smut stashed away in your garage, you could, under this law, be considered to be harboring deeply illicit materials. Some critics have suggested that Lee’s definition of obscenity is so ridiculously broad that it could effectively criminalize Game of Thrones. That said, the punishments for merely possessing porn under the proposed law seem unclear at this point, as the legislation seems more focused on punishing the creators and distributors of racy material.

 

Spoiler

The law would “pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn,” The Daily Caller writes.

“Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” said Lee, in a press release about the bill. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.”

Lee’s view of pornography hews closely to that of the Heritage Foundation, which has similarly sought to crush the smut industry. In its Mandate for Leadership, Project 2025 defines pornography as the “omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” and argues that the “people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned” and that “telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

It should be noted that porn has always been a hot-button issue and that critics have long tried to criminalize it. The history of the anti-pornography movement in the U.S. is a long and complicated one, littered with differing ideological justifications and strange bedfellows. In recent years, however, the anti-porn crusade has largely been led by the MAGA right.

Much of the modern anti-porn movement has sought to focus on the harmful psychological impact that pornography may have on young web users and children. It has targeted online access to porn by instituting age-verification requirements for porn websites that bar underage users. Over the past decade, over a dozen states have passed legislation designed to curb youth access to porn, much of which is still being challenged in court.

 

  • Rage+1 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

https://gizmodo.com/gop-senator-introduces-bill-to-make-all-porn-a-federal-crime-following-project-2025-playbook-2000600994

 

 

 

 

 

  Hide contents

The law would “pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn,” The Daily Caller writes.

“Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” said Lee, in a press release about the bill. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.”

Lee’s view of pornography hews closely to that of the Heritage Foundation, which has similarly sought to crush the smut industry. In its Mandate for Leadership, Project 2025 defines pornography as the “omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” and argues that the “people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned” and that “telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

It should be noted that porn has always been a hot-button issue and that critics have long tried to criminalize it. The history of the anti-pornography movement in the U.S. is a long and complicated one, littered with differing ideological justifications and strange bedfellows. In recent years, however, the anti-porn crusade has largely been led by the MAGA right.

Much of the modern anti-porn movement has sought to focus on the harmful psychological impact that pornography may have on young web users and children. It has targeted online access to porn by instituting age-verification requirements for porn websites that bar underage users. Over the past decade, over a dozen states have passed legislation designed to curb youth access to porn, much of which is still being challenged in court.

 

That seems like a lot of work. Can’t we just get Mike Lee’s teenage son to monitor our porn intake?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Executive Orders that do something good get delayed for years before dying. Executive Orders that do bad stuff get enacted immediately and stay in effect for years while being appealed. 

Well, you may not be able to count on SCOTUS to support Trump, but you can probably count on them to support big business.

Posted
26 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

I'm a Goyard girl, not a LV person. More like this.

 

20250512_202131.jpg

20250512_202131.jpg

Valley Girl Hair Flip GIF by Freedomists

Although i did pick up some new stuff last month 😅

PXL_20250421_215056179.thumb.jpg.90d1a78d7e895762ef186b34ea75b3a8.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal.

image.gif.e8af62f9089e9d4cd2e070541c69e1c6.gif

  • Haha 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Project 2025 defines pornography as the “omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children”

Tells you a lot about what kind of porn the P2025ers watch.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Tells you a lot about what kind of porn the P2025ers watch.

“That’s fucking hot! It takes the man out while leaving the man in!”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
11 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I don't understand why Boeing hasn't been able to deliver the 2 new 747s but is there actually a problem with the current two planes?

It's unreal that we're allowing a country to give our President a gift worth $400m. And on top of that, the US taxpayer is going to pay to modify and then hand it over to Trump when he's out of office. 

the current AF-1 air frames are pretty old (first flight in 1987), there's no new 4 engine aircraft coming out, and the air force really wants 4 engine aircraft for reasons. the VC-25s are currently older than the VC-137Cs were when the current planes replaced those two.

Posted
2 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

https://gizmodo.com/gop-senator-introduces-bill-to-make-all-porn-a-federal-crime-following-project-2025-playbook-2000600994

 

 

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

The law would “pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online porn,” The Daily Caller writes.

“Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” said Lee, in a press release about the bill. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.”

Lee’s view of pornography hews closely to that of the Heritage Foundation, which has similarly sought to crush the smut industry. In its Mandate for Leadership, Project 2025 defines pornography as the “omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” and argues that the “people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned” and that “telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

It should be noted that porn has always been a hot-button issue and that critics have long tried to criminalize it. The history of the anti-pornography movement in the U.S. is a long and complicated one, littered with differing ideological justifications and strange bedfellows. In recent years, however, the anti-porn crusade has largely been led by the MAGA right.

Much of the modern anti-porn movement has sought to focus on the harmful psychological impact that pornography may have on young web users and children. It has targeted online access to porn by instituting age-verification requirements for porn websites that bar underage users. Over the past decade, over a dozen states have passed legislation designed to curb youth access to porn, much of which is still being challenged in court.

 


 

agas.jpg?id=32676532&width=1245&height=7

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/12/hasan-piker-border-trump-gaza

This is a lot more sinister than it seems at first glance. This guy is probably the largest online progressive political pundit, is a US citizen, and CBP had no reason to do this (other than the one we all know). He was pulled in for "further questioning" alongside quite a few others and he was the only citizen that was detained. Questioned extensively about what he thought of Trump and Israel.

Quote

Hasan Piker, a US-born progressive political commentator, said he was stopped by US Customs and Border Protection agents and questioned about his opinions of Donald Trump and Israeli war policy as he returned to the country on Sunday from France.

Also some of you should pay attention to how the interrogator was behaving and realize that it closely resembles your past behavior in the Israel thread.

  • Rage+1 8
Posted
6 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/12/hasan-piker-border-trump-gaza

This is a lot more sinister than it seems at first glance. This guy is probably the largest online progressive political pundit, is a US citizen, and CBP had no reason to do this (other than the one we all know). He was pulled in for "further questioning" alongside quite a few others and he was the only citizen that was detained. Questioned extensively about what he thought of Trump and Israel.

Also some of you should pay attention to how the interrogator was behaving and realize that it closely resembles your past behavior in the Israel thread.


I need to start a duty free shop that sells only MAGA memorabilia, Trump swag, and america flag apparel.

spacer.png

Posted

Some more articles:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/12/political-commentator-hasan-piker-chicago-airport/83588720007/

Quote

"They straight up tried to get something out of me that I think they could use to basically detain me permanently,” Piker said. "(The agent) kept saying stuff like, 'Do you like Hamas? Do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a terror group or a resistance group?'”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2025/05/12/hasan-piker-detained-border-agents-twitch/

https://www.newsweek.com/hasan-piker-cbp-border-detention-questioning-chicago-watch-2071261

Quote

Piker said on his livestream that he was "instantly" told to "step aside" for additional questioning while going through a Global Entry checkpoint after flying into Chicago's O'Hare International Airport from France.

"'Here we f****** go,'" Piker recounted thinking, adding that he immediately texted his family members and manager when he was on his way in for more questioning.

The progressive streamer, who is a U.S. citizen and passport holder, said he was eventually taken to a separate room for questioning, adding that the experience was "an insane f****** situation."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hasan-piker-twitch-streamer-questioned-us-customs-rcna206406

Quote

“They knew who I was and they were ready to receive me, let’s just say, and it wasn’t a very warm welcome,”  Piker, known as HasanAbi online, told his followers during a live stream. News of his detainment was first reported by User Mag.  

The Turkish American streamer — who has more than 2.8 million followers on Twitch, 1.6 million subscribers on YouTube and 1.2 million followers on TikTok — is known for being vocal on a number of political and social issues, including his support for Palestinian people and criticism of Israeli leaders.

 

  • Rage+1 6
Posted
45 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Do you want another brain worm? Because this is how you get another brain worm. 

 

bafkreif26xcmaqzdajdbmc42ilg25jf3c3mwmtl5whuuthrp2lmj5bzhqy.jpg

This regime is bursting at the seams with the most cartoonishly creepy people you can imagine. It's really quite a feat by the magats. 

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I don't understand why Boeing hasn't been able to deliver the 2 new 747s but is there actually a problem with the current two planes?

It's unreal that we're allowing a country to give our President a gift worth $400m. And on top of that, the US taxpayer is going to pay to modify and then hand it over to Trump when he's out of office. 

 

didn't trump 1.0 take all the govt inspectors out of boeing factories ?

Posted
3 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

According to the bill text, “a picture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or other visual depiction” of any media that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion” would be considered criminal.

So I guess VY’s 4th and 5 run is just gonna be wiped off the face of the Earth now? 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Do you want another brain worm? Because this is how you get another brain worm. 

 

bafkreif26xcmaqzdajdbmc42ilg25jf3c3mwmtl5whuuthrp2lmj5bzhqy.jpg

 

he's riding the H again ?

Posted
14 hours ago, Texas Jeff said:

Also, Hamilton warned us about this, but he used big words that are hard for us to understand:

An avaricious man, who might happen to fill the office, looking forward to a time when he must at all events yield up the emoluments he enjoyed, would feel a propensity, not easy to be resisted by such a man, to make the best use of the opportunity he enjoyed while it lasted, and might not scruple to have recourse to the most corrupt expedients to make the harvest as abundant as it was transitory; though the same man, probably, with a different prospect before him, might content himself with the regular perquisites of his situation, and might even be unwilling to risk the consequences of an abuse of his opportunities. His avarice might be a guard upon his avarice. Add to this that the same man might be vain or ambitious, as well as avaricious. And if he could expect to prolong his honors by his good conduct, he might hesitate to sacrifice his appetite for them to his appetite for gain. But with the prospect before him of approaching an inevitable annihilation, his avarice would be likely to get the victory over his caution, his vanity, or his ambition.

I couldn't help but read this in the voice of Lin-Manuel Miranda rapping the quoted text.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

https://www.404media.co/republicans-try-to-cram-ban-on-ai-regulation-into-budget-reconciliation-bill/

 

Quote

“...no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act,” says the text of the bill introduced Sunday night by Congressman Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The text of the bill will be considered by the House at the budget reconciliation markup on May 13.

 

  • Rage+1 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 4
Posted
15 minutes ago, MrBig said:

So I guess VY’s 4th and 5 run is just gonna be wiped off the face of the Earth now? 

No. 
But the resulting hard on if videoed, photographed, drawn, traced, spoken of, podcasted about, mimed, written about, or creatively danced in appreciation of would all be illegal.

  • Drool 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Dnaguy said:

No. 
But the resulting hard on if videoed, photographed, drawn, traced, spoken of, podcasted about, mimed, written about, or creatively danced in appreciation of would all be illegal.

Erotically specific. Go on...

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Benjamin Wittes is a jewel. 
 

 

How is Pam Bondi, an attorney formerly (assumption that it’s formerly, it would not shock me if it’s currently) on the payroll of the Qatari government writing opinions on the legality of accepting a 747-8i as a gift not a conflict of interest? We keep being told that the legal profession isn’t in any sort of ethical crisis and they police themselves.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
17 hours ago, bolverk said:

 

I also recall that in early January 2020, Xi had warned him in a phone call that it would be a monster.

And to further 68's point, here's a timeline of Mr. It-Will-Magically-Disappear-By-Easter’s bullshit, leading up to that first precipitous drop in the market:

May 2018

The Trump Administration disbands the White House pandemic response team.

July 2019

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) epidemiologist embedded in China’s disease control agency left the post, and the Trump Administration eliminated the role.

Oct. 2019

“Currently, there are insufficient funding sources designated for the federal government to use in response to a severe influenza pandemic.”

Jan. 22, 2020

“We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China. It’s going to be just fine.”

Jan. 24, 2020

Trump praises China’s handling of the coronavirus: “China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!”

Jan. 28, 2020

“This will be the biggest national security threat you face in your presidency...This is going to be the roughest thing you face." Trump’s National Security Advisor says to Trump.

Jan. 30, 2020

"The lack of immune protection or an existing cure or vaccine would leave Americans defenseless in the case of a full-blown coronavirus outbreak on US soil,...This lack of protection elevates the risk of the coronavirus evolving into a full-blown pandemic, imperiling the lives of millions of Americans.” [Memo from Trump Trade Advisor Peter Navarro]

Feb. 2, 2020

“We pretty much shut it down coming in from China.”

Feb. 7, 2020

“It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flu... This is deadly stuff.” [Trump in a private interview with Bob Woodward from The Washington Post made public on Sept. 9, 2020]

Feb. 10, 2020

“I think the virus is going to be—it’s going to be fine.”

Feb. 10, 2020

“Looks like by April, you know in theory when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away.”

Feb. 24, 2020

“The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA… the Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”

Feb. 25, 2020

“CDC and my Administration are doing a GREAT job of handling Coronavirus.”

Feb. 25, 2020

“I think that's a problem that’s going to go away… They have studied it. They know very much. In fact, we’re very close to a vaccine.”

Feb. 26, 2020

“The 15 (cases in the US) within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero.”

Feb. 26, 2020

“We're going very substantially down, not up.”

Feb. 26, 2020

“Well, we're testing everybody that we need to test. And we're finding very little problem. Very little problem.”

Feb. 26, 2020

"This is a flu. This is like a flu."

Feb. 27, 2020

“It’s going to disappear. One day, it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.”

Feb. 27, 2020

“The ineptness with which the Trump Administration approached this problem is not only serious, it can be deadly if not changed in the approach.” – Rep. Lloyd Doggett [During a hearing, Rep. Doggett questions HHS Sec. Azar on Trump's refusal to take this virus seriously, warning about mask and test shortages.]

Feb. 28, 2020

“We're ordering a lot of supplies. We're ordering a lot of, uh, elements that frankly we wouldn't be ordering unless it was something like this. But we're ordering a lot of different elements of medical.”

March 2, 2020

“You take a solid flu vaccine, you don't think that could have an impact, or much of an impact, on corona?” [Trump to health officials who answered "No."]

March 2, 2020

“A lot of things are happening, a lot of very exciting things are happening and they’re happening very rapidly.”

March 4, 2020

“Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and it's very mild.”

March 4, 2020

“If we have thousands or hundreds of thousands of people that get better just by, you know, sitting around and even going to work — some of them go to work, but they get better.”

March 5, 2020

“I NEVER said people that are feeling sick should go to work.”

March 5, 2020

“The United States… has, as of now, only 129 cases… and 11 deaths. We are working very hard to keep these numbers as low as possible!”

March 6, 2020

“I think we’re doing a really good job in this country at keeping it down… a tremendous job at keeping it down.”

March 6, 2020

“You have to be calm. It’ll go away.”

March 6, 2020

“Anybody right now, and yesterday, anybody that needs a test gets a test. They’re there. And the tests are beautiful…. the tests are all perfect like the letter was perfect. The transcription was perfect. Right? This was not as perfect as that but pretty good.”

March 6, 2020

“I like this stuff. I really get it. People are surprised that I understand it… Every one of these doctors said, ‘How do you know so much about this?’ Maybe I have a natural ability. Maybe I should have done that instead of running for president.”

March 6, 2020

“I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship that wasn't our fault.”

March 7, 2020

“No, I’m not concerned at all.

March 8, 2020

“We have a perfectly coordinated and fine-tuned plan at the White House for our attack on CoronaVirus.”

Holy shit and spot on.

Of course MAGATS will call it fake news by the liberal media 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

He told Woodward that he knew covid was airborne spread in Feb of 2020. He said he told Americans “i dont know how its spread” for the first few months because he didnt want people to panic. Instead, a couple million people died

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, royiv said:

How is Pam Bondi, an attorney formerly (assumption that it’s formerly, it would not shock me if it’s currently) on the payroll of the Qatari government writing opinions on the legality of accepting a 747-8i as a gift not a conflict of interest? We keep being told that the legal profession isn’t in any sort of ethical crisis and they police themselves.

The AG doesn't really have any business doing that in the first place, because the AG doesn't represent the President, or really even the Office of the President.  All that other shit aside.

That's a job for OLC and White House counsel, the OLC providing guidance to the executive branch generally, and White House counsel advocating for the President specifically.

All DOJ, but traditionally with different responsibilities and "clients."

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The AG doesn't really have any business doing that in the first place, because the AG doesn't represent the President, or really even the Office of the President.  All that other shit aside.

That's a job for OLC and White House counsel, the OLC providing guidance to the executive branch generally, and White House counsel advocating for the President specifically.

All DOJ, but traditionally with different responsibilities and "clients."

Things are not okay and this is the sort of bullshit that reflects poorly on the entire legal profession. Why are we not hearing from lawyers up in arms that their profession is being trashed by bad actors all over the place in this regime? Instead we see firms bending the knee. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

This dude is an absolute dipshit. Imagine how gotdamned stupid you have to be to worship this cumstain.

 

the funny part is he's talking about elmo

  • Haha 5
Posted
15 minutes ago, royiv said:

Things are not okay and this is the sort of bullshit that reflects poorly on the entire legal profession. Why are we not hearing from lawyers up in arms that their profession is being trashed by bad actors all over the place in this regime? Instead we see firms bending the knee. 

And we have others not bending the knee and calling this for what it is.

Posted
21 minutes ago, royiv said:

Things are not okay and this is the sort of bullshit that reflects poorly on the entire legal profession. Why are we not hearing from lawyers up in arms that their profession is being trashed by bad actors all over the place in this regime? Instead we see firms bending the knee. 

The problem isn’t that she’s a lawyer it’s that she’s a trump cunt. It’s not unique to any profession. Everyone working for this regime is corrupt in their own field.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The AG doesn't really have any business doing that in the first place, because the AG doesn't represent the President, or really even the Office of the President.  All that other shit aside.

That's a job for OLC and White House counsel, the OLC providing guidance to the executive branch generally, and White House counsel advocating for the President specifically.

All DOJ, but traditionally with different responsibilities and "clients."

In Oklahoma the governor or a member of the state legislature can ask the AG for an opinion which is not binding but informative and persuasive. Is there a similar procedure at the fed level? Reminds me of when Bush got a memo that torture was totally cool and legal. Just asking procedurally. Substantively it doesn’t matter it’s all just absurdity and corruption. 

Edited by 'stache
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, 'stache said:

The problem isn’t that she’s a lawyer it’s that she’s a trump cunt. It’s not unique to any profession. Everyone working for this regime is corrupt in their own field.

But we have lawyers on this board who will die on the hill that they self police their profession. So if a Trump cunt, who also happens to be a lawyer, is issuing legal opinions out of a conflict of interest, the profession should be taking care of that problem amongst themselves, but here we are.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

You gotta know Trump wanted them to give it to him personally.  The Emir or Sheikh or whoever probably said, you know we can't do that, we have to give it to your government, and Trump was like, "OK, but I want it after."

And you have to bet he didn't even think of the shit they'll have to do to it to make it AF1 capable. We're talking 10s of millions of dollars, if not more. I'm sure if it was up to him, he'd just take it as-is and not worry about any security issues/flaws. He's that fucking stupid.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
53 minutes ago, royiv said:

How is Pam Bondi, an attorney formerly (assumption that it’s formerly, it would not shock me if it’s currently) on the payroll of the Qatari government writing opinions on the legality of accepting a 747-8i as a gift not a conflict of interest? We keep being told that the legal profession isn’t in any sort of ethical crisis and they police themselves.

I'd be shocked if it's not "currently." 



×
×
  • Create New...