Jump to content

Charlie Kirk Assassinated [Shooter in custody]


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Also, just to recap: 

 

All Democrat politicians and prominent figures immediately condemn the assassination, mourn Kirk, and urge everyone to do better and be better than this.

 

The right's thought leaders immediately threaten retribution, war, and blood to ALL liberals before a single thing is known about the shooter. The completely unknown suspect becomes the literal personification of their political enemy. They jump on--and podcast--poorly sourced bullshit about Trans messaging. They gave Kirk military honors when the Minnesota lawmakers couldn't even get a phone call. Then they flailed around wildly when the suspect didn't fit the demographic they wanted to push their political payback agenda, appearing more likely to belong to an offshoot of one of their extreme alt-right cesspools than some blue hair. Topped off with the President, in plain words, stating that right wing violence is justifiable because the left must be stopped.

 

"Oh you don't realize what you've unleashed. It's over in 2028."

K.

And how pathetic is it that you might be right?

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, they condemn MEAN WORDS.   They want to cancel everyone who isn’t sucking off Charlie.  Meanwhile their orange GOD says this shit and they can’t bring themselves to say anything.  It’s absolutely pathetic.   

 

image.png.f64c4122e12c76f0f1d4ffcbc95282f1.png
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Its kinda funny watching you guys just totally whiff on why CK resonated with the politically disaffected demographics that will decide American politics in the future. His political apparatus resulted in the first GOP popular vote victory in 20 years. Dismiss if you want under whatever cloak.   

Nobody is doing that. His wife just isn’t the reason that that faction continues.

Posted
4 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Also, just to recap: 

 

All Democrat politicians and prominent figures immediately condemn the assassination, mourn Kirk, and urge everyone to do better and be better than this.

 

The right's thought leaders immediately threaten retribution, war, and blood to ALL liberals before a single thing is known about the shooter. The completely unknown suspect becomes the literal personification of their political enemy. They jump on--and podcast--poorly sourced bullshit about Trans messaging. They gave Kirk military honors when the Minnesota lawmakers couldn't even get a phone call. Then they flailed around wildly when the suspect didn't fit the demographic they wanted to push their political payback agenda, appearing more likely to belong to an offshoot of one of their extreme alt-right cesspools than some blue hair. Topped off with the President, in plain words, stating that right wing violence is justifiable because the left must be stopped.

 

"Oh you don't realize what you've unleashed. It's over in 2028."

K.

And how pathetic is it that you might be right?

I honestly hope that you guys find your way out of the wilderness. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

I honestly hope that you guys find your way out of the wilderness. 

Why can’t you comment on this?   So weird for someone who claims to hate this kind f thing.  
image.png.08a71c9706569ebf9ff67abb0c5efb08.png

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Ted Lange said:

I’m genuinely curious.  Had this very talk with Trumpers tonight.  They refused to believe he actually said this until I pulled up the video.  

...and then they continued about their day and will never acknowledge it's existence again.

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

It is wild how these people who are so mad at political discourse can’t bring themselves to talk about the President.  They, specifically @Anastasis is more concerned about @Brisketexan than he is the PRESIDENT.   Insane 

You seem unfortunately obsessed. I think that CK was right in his approach, engaging people directly when possible in his orbit. You and brisket have some deep regrets that you try to project onto others. It's ok and obvious. 

Posted

I never hear MAGA make an argument.  they usually either want to fuck me or fuck one of my women but do not know how to ask nor how to act.  Speak up, MAGATs?

Posted
4 hours ago, Anastasis said:

Hell hath no fury…

 

She has the keys to one of the largest and most powerful youth-oriented political apparatus in this country. 
 

She told you exactly what she was going to do with it. 

Her? I wish her good luck. She’s not going to do anything for that brand, though. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ted Lange said:

It is wild how these people who are so mad at political discourse can’t bring themselves to talk about the President.  They, specifically @Anastasis is more concerned about @Brisketexan than he is the PRESIDENT.   Insane 

Well, Brisket body slams Ana routinely and Ana hate hate hates that. Thus the obsession.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

Kinda funny watching you guys rally around the incapability of a woman cause your baked in reasons. 

Tradwife isn’t Surly’s construct…it’s a big reason why Fuentes and his crew went to war with TPUSA. He’ll continue it against anyone TPUSA puts up, but will be twice as hard on Kirk. That’s not misogynistic, just scanning Fuentes’ feed will show you his mindset. 

Posted (edited)

This was almost certainly an outburst of confused anger flowing from jumbled and contradictory political moods. A disturbed and agitated individual who will not be able to explain the connection of Charlie Kirk to his anger and his desired outcomes for himself or society in any way understandable to other people.
 

Nevertheless, under this FBI and administration we will likely get a selectively and carefully constructed narrative of designed and organized “radicalization” by an amorphous group of “leftists” because the president has already announced that’s what he wants. In an earlier generation, our leaders would have been relieved to explain this as the actions of an unstable individual acting on his on to turn the heat down. Now, they will weave a fictional meta narrative precisely to turn the heat up. 

Edited by 956 Worldwide
Posted
11 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

This was almost certainly an outburst of confused anger flowing from jumbled and contradictory political moods. A disturbed and agitated individual who will not be able to explain the connection of Charlie Kirk to his anger and his desired outcomes for himself or society in any way understandable to other people.
 

Nevertheless, under this FBI and administration we will likely get a selectively and carefully constructed narrative of designed and organized “radicalization” by an amorphous group of “leftists” because the president has already announced that’s what he wants. In an earlier generation, our leaders would have been relieved to explain this as the actions of an unstable individual acting on his on to turn the heat down. Now, they will weave a fictional meta narrative precisely to turn the heat up. 

😆 

giphy.gif

 

Posted
1 hour ago, NaTeWHO said:

Bluesky Robert fuckin Evans...

giphy.gif

I don't understand, are you arguing he is frequently counter-factual like TPUSA? Or that his plain reading of the article y'all have desperately posted a dozen times turns out to be bullshit?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...