Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Post Oak said:

 

Yep Stalin loved his family.  

ei4apkrrxfla1.thumb.jpg.0e66e4911960fd9c14303978eb056eef.jpg

Stalin was 5’5”, how short was the guy they edited out? Stalin looks to have a foot on him. Or maybe Stalin wore lifts like DeSantis or Trump.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Been taking lessons from Un?

300 yard drives followed by 140 yard pw?


140 yards should be a 60 degree lob wedge, if you’re a player 

Posted

140 yards should be a 60 degree lob wedge, if you’re a player 

Trump hits his drives about 180-190 yards based on the DeChambeau challenge. He ain’t hitting PW 140 yards.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
If he was actually decent at golf we’d see videos of him playing all over Fox. 

He’s not bad — for a 78-year-old fat fuck.
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, C-Man said:


He’s not bad — for a 78-year-old fat fuck.

My dad is 75ish, shoots his age or better about half the time. He stays in old man ‘shape’ 

sr tees 

Posted
9 minutes ago, C-Man said:


Trump hits his drives about 180-190 yards based on the DeChambeau challenge. He ain’t hitting PW 140 yards.

How much shorter are the ladies' tees?

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

 

So I asked Chat GPT to calculate the odds — this is 1 in a million weird. To calculate the odds of making back-to-back eagles on two par fours, we need to consider the probability of making an eagle on a single par four and then use this probability to find the odds of achieving this twice in a row. ### Probability of an Eagle on a Par Four 1. **Average Golfer**: The probability of making an eagle on a par four is extremely low for the average golfer. Eagles are rare events, typically more likely for professional golfers. 2. **Professional Golfer**: Even for professional golfers, the probability of making an eagle on a par four is quite low, possibly around 1% (or 0.01) or less, depending on the golfer and the specific hole conditions. ### Calculating Back-to-Back Eagles Assuming a probability \( p \) of making an eagle on a single par four, the probability of making back-to-back eagles on two par fours is: \[ p^2 \] ### Example Calculations - **Average Golfer (0.001 probability per hole)**: \[ p = 0.001 \implies p^2 = (0.001)^2 = 0.000001 \] Thus, the odds are 1 in 1,000,000. - **Professional Golfer (0.01 probability per hole)**: \[ p = 0.01 \implies p^2 = (0.01)^2 = 0.0001 \] Thus, the odds are 1 in 10,000. These calculations highlight how rare back-to-back eagles are, even for professional golfers, due to the low probability of achieving an eagle on any given par four.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
50 minutes ago, safe sex said:

Can someone who knows math better than an AI that was trained on interpreting language do the odds instead?

Slim and none

Posted

So, this was at the height of the "weird" push from Dems.  Sam Brown, whose face and body were severely burned in combat, decided to spin the logical fallacy wheel.

Right Sam, that's what they meant.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

I’m surprised by how triggered they are by being called weird. Dems should not be bullied into letting up. Call their weird asses weird every chance you get.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
18 hours ago, Zepol87 said:

The whole thread is pretty crazy. 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1819541122546577472.html

For those without twitter. Apparently dude grew up poor and disadvantaged. Just kidding, his parents seem like they are pretty well off  as they own an airport  and a couple of businesses.  But they did send him to Tech, so lets call it partially disadvantaged.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Blotto said:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1819541122546577472.html

For those without twitter. Apparently dude grew up poor and disadvantaged. Just kidding, his parents seem like they are pretty well off  as they own an airport  and a couple of businesses.  But they did send him to Tech, so lets call it partially disadvantaged.

 

Thanks for that. Dude came into our section which is 90% Hispanic and was trying to start shit. He succeeded then tried to press charges 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Zepol87 said:

Thanks for that. Dude came into our section which is 90% Hispanic and was trying to start shit. He succeeded then tried to press charges 

Well his employer/job info was posted, as well as enough information to easily figure out his family in Celina as well as his parent's businesses and home address. So I'm sure Gritty will be swinging by soon enough to take care of the "finding out" part. I not gonna post his family information here because for all I know they abhor him, but they will likely be given the opportunity soon to make that clear. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Yeah, that Musk scheme harvesting voter info through a pseudo-PAC seemed shady as hell.  I would not be surprised that it's actually criminal.

I would laugh my ass off if Elon ever had to spend a night behind bars.  Won't happen, because reasons.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Slim and none

Only time that word will ever be associated with Dotard. 

I'd bet that this guy would pull off two eagles before Donald... 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
17 hours ago, Jive Turkey said:

This chick is the worst. 

 

Already posted, already ruined my fucking day, already ranted on that woman who is next in line after me.



×
×
  • Create New...