Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Gil Bang said:

it wouldn't be hard to fool trump.  You could have a microphone that looks like a microphone and Trump would still blather on about all his crimes.

"Should I even be showing you this?  People say I shouldn't show this around, but do you know what this beautiful thing is? Nobody talks about it, but it's so beautiful and maybe it's against the law to show you, but I'm President, and I can show it to you because I was the top law enforcement officers in the country. Oh yes, I was over the attorney general so that makes me the top."

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Most likely he's got a recording app on his phone that doesn't look like a recording app.

Well, yes obviously it was something more discrete.  And knowing how wise Trump's inner circle was, I'm sure the App was renamed "DO NOT DESTROY" on his homepage.  This is fucking amazing.  There is a former Australian Ambassador to the U.S. who lives in Austin.  He is married to a wonderful Texas-Ex.  He hinted that Trump may have opened his mouth one too many times around Australian emissaries about U.S. Naval capacities.  I had no idea what he was talking about at the time because it was a time I was trying to keep up 2 drinks to his 1 and the small group around us.  I am, and have been for some time, fresh out of ideas as to the extent this Trump simulation will go to in order to shock me.  I am no longer capable of shock.  

The only thing left is for him to sell Naval secrets to Uzbekistan and Liechtenstein.  The only two nations on Earth that are double land-locked and couldn't have any less use for Naval intelligence than the people of Mars.  But by this time next month, I fully expect that to be the case.  

Posted

Can’t wait for the ‘Dotard is dead’ breaking news notifications to go off on my phone on a random 3am weeknight (my notifications are silenced, but still).

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Captainant said:

SIAP, but it would appear that Powell is violating her plea agreement what with her newsletters that she is publicizing on her social media accounts, claiming that she's innocent and was forced into the plea

https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney-powell-doubt-election-results-attack-prosecutors-after-guilty-plea-2023-10

She had to stand up and swear that nobody did any such thing, in court under oath, for the plea to be accepted, right?

I'm trying to find a copy of the plea agreement.  It doesn't look like it was publicly filed.

Defendants are free, I suppose, to contradict or outright deny their plea agreements to the public. Everyone in prison is innocent, and most of them are there by plea.

 It doesn't affect anything with the court or the plea itself. although, if she insists it was coerced, a court could drag her back in, rehear that, and revoke the plea.

What I did find, however, is something that will make you very happy I think.

And that is that the first thing she pled to is "conspiracy to commit theft by taking."  

And the Georgia Criminal Code provides

§ 16-8-2. Theft by Taking

Universal Citation: GA Code § 16-8-2 (2020)

A person commits the offense of theft by taking when he unlawfully takes or, being in lawful possession thereof, unlawfully appropriates any property of another with the intention of depriving him of the property, regardless of the manner in which the property is taken or appropriated.

The Texas Disciplinary Rules of Procedure provide, in the definitions section:

GG. “Serious Crime” means barratry; any felony involving moral turpitude; any misdemeanor involving theft, embezzlement, or fraudulent or reckless misappropriation of money or other property; or any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation of another to commit any of the foregoing crimes.

and

V. “Intentional Crime” means (1) any Serious Crime that requires proof of knowledge or intent as an essential element or (2) any crime involving misapplication of money or other property held as a fiduciary.

And, finally:

8.05. Disbarment: When an attorney has been convicted of an Intentional Crime, and that conviction has become final, or the attorney has accepted probation with or without an adjudication of guilt for an Intentional Crime, the attorney shall be disbarred . . . .

So, ol Sid seems pretty highly likely, almost dead certain in fact, to lose her Texas law license notwithstanding what happens relative to the Kraken suits.

The "felony of moral turpitude" out that I discussed earlier has no application here.  And, I have personal knowledge that the Bar lawyers that handle this stuff are familiar, fully competent, and pretty fucking fierce at handling this type of thing, known as "compulsory discipline."  Plus, the only thing they have to prove is the conviction itself.

Legal reporting is shitty, because no one mentioned that one of the misdemeanors was theft.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

I'm not real flexible, but I will attempt to suck my own cock when I get that notification.

For those of you that are single, if you can't get laid the night he dies...you're all kinds of wrong.  Obviously there'll be tens of millions mourning but there will so much hot, liberated trim out there just waiting to make bad decisions on the happiest night of their young lives.  Go gay, go straight, go anal, just go.  Live it up.  It'll be fucking Mardi Gras, New Year's Eve, and Junior Prom all rolled into one.  Everybody not committed will be looking to go oral with the nearest warm-blooded animal that night.  Admittedly, I will not be having sex that night.  Despite loving my attractive wife and her understanding my hatred of Trump (she doesn't like him but she's also unsure about my vitriolic despising of the piece of human shit), I couldn't bang her even if I wanted to because I'm going on a concerning and boner-killing amount of narcotics and also possibly in a Canadian prison.  

Posted

Heather has things to say.

Wow. If Jenna Ellis plead guilty out of fear, fine.

Even after taking all that money in donations. Its a scary position to be in. But for her to read that BS letter insinuating GA wasn’t riddled with fraud & corruption, & that she just trusted the wrong people, is DIRTY. All while claiming to be Christian.

I personally went on her show multiple times detailing election issues in Georgia. I was sitting in the room along with her and Rudy Giuliani and others at the Georgia Capitol listening to all the testimony during the Senate hearings. Testimony from voters, election workers, detailing FRAUD, procedural violations, and so much more.

I just can’t for the life of me understand how she could say that if she knew then, what she knew now, she would have DECLINED to represent Trump. Like what the hell do YOU know now, Jenna? Please enlighten me. Did they force you to read that letter? Was that part of the plea deal? I really don’t get it.

If I ever apologize and tell you all that there was no 2020 election fraud in Georgia, I can promise you right now, it’s being said under duress. That election was a complete show!! Fraud, mules, irregularities, corruption, deception, coverups, money laundering. The list goes on.

Posted
7 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Heather has things to say.

Wow. If Jenna Ellis plead guilty out of fear, fine.

Even after taking all that money in donations. Its a scary position to be in. But for her to read that BS letter insinuating GA wasn’t riddled with fraud & corruption, & that she just trusted the wrong people, is DIRTY. All while claiming to be Christian.

I personally went on her show multiple times detailing election issues in Georgia. I was sitting in the room along with her and Rudy Giuliani and others at the Georgia Capitol listening to all the testimony during the Senate hearings. Testimony from voters, election workers, detailing FRAUD, procedural violations, and so much more.

I just can’t for the life of me understand how she could say that if she knew then, what she knew now, she would have DECLINED to represent Trump. Like what the hell do YOU know now, Jenna? Please enlighten me. Did they force you to read that letter? Was that part of the plea deal? I really don’t get it.

If I ever apologize and tell you all that there was no 2020 election fraud in Georgia, I can promise you right now, it’s being said under duress. That election was a complete show!! Fraud, mules, irregularities, corruption, deception, coverups, money laundering. The list goes on.

Don't stick your dick in crazy? That's all I got. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Heather has things to say.

Wow. If Jenna Ellis plead guilty out of fear, fine.

Even after taking all that money in donations. Its a scary position to be in. But for her to read that BS letter insinuating GA wasn’t riddled with fraud & corruption, & that she just trusted the wrong people, is DIRTY. All while claiming to be Christian.

I personally went on her show multiple times detailing election issues in Georgia. I was sitting in the room along with her and Rudy Giuliani and others at the Georgia Capitol listening to all the testimony during the Senate hearings. Testimony from voters, election workers, detailing FRAUD, procedural violations, and so much more.

I just can’t for the life of me understand how she could say that if she knew then, what she knew now, she would have DECLINED to represent Trump. Like what the hell do YOU know now, Jenna? Please enlighten me. Did they force you to read that letter? Was that part of the plea deal? I really don’t get it.

If I ever apologize and tell you all that there was no 2020 election fraud in Georgia, I can promise you right now, it’s being said under duress. That election was a complete show!! Fraud, mules, irregularities, corruption, deception, coverups, money laundering. The list goes on.

/ConnorMcGregor

Posted
9 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

If I ever apologize and tell you all that there was no 2020 election fraud in Georgia, I can promise you right now, it’s being said under duress. That election was a complete show!! Fraud, mules, irregularities, corruption, deception, coverups, money laundering. The list goes on.

So much fraud! Everywhere!

Fine, show me some.

Um well you see the thing about that is um let me get back to you....

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I don't know why Trump's inability to spell the word "stolen" bothers me so much, but it does.  I seriously question if his IQ tops 90.

Pick a lower number if you want to make this interesting. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
I would like to ask this dude, "so, what do you want to do when you're president again?" 
 
I mean, I know he just wants to get paid. 
Or you can pay attention to all the horrible stuff he Says he plans to do.

Like in 2016 it's all out in the open if you just listen to that asshole.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
55 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

Hold the phone -- that hosebag is actually doing something in the court room other than acting as eye candy for Trump?   Holy shit, I had no idea!

Posted
12 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

it wouldn't be hard to fool trump.  You could have a microphone that looks like a microphone and Trump would still blather on about all his crimes.

Meadows brought in one of these and Trump took it from there 

 

B29C00F7-0678-4F70-98C3-C8E586A64084.thumb.jpeg.daa1fb7a13dabc3686bd03a534510402.jpeg

  • Haha 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, Js1 said:

“No sir, I wasn’t attacking your staff. I was attacking a witness”

Why would a witness be "sitting alongside" the judge?

Throw that asshole in jail.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
3 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Why would a witness be "sitting alongside" the judge?

Throw that asshole in jail.

The witness box is generally right next to the judge. But yeah, throw him in jail. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

The witness box is generally right next to the judge.

Eh, when he's on the stand.  Otherwise, no.  But of course Trump is an idiot, which is his best defense.

Posted

Severely punished in court speak = $5,000 fine

Trump could call for the execution of the law clerk every day and the Judge will issue a strongly worded letter

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Severely punished in court speak = $5,000 fine

Trump could call for the execution of the law clerk every day and the Judge will issue a strongly worded letter

The sanctions for violating the gag order are going to escalate.  Not sure at this point it's going to be jail, maybe 25k or 50k.

The problem for the judge here in these kinds of cases is that they are the sole arbiter of violation and punishment, and there's usually a personal element to it.  So the sanctions have to be progressive.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The sanctions for violating the gag order are going to escalate.  Not sure at this point it's going to be jail, maybe 25k or 50k.

The problem for the judge here in these kinds of cases is that they are the sole arbiter of violation and punishment, and there's usually a personal element to it.  So the sanctions have to be progressive.

What happens when dotard doesn't pay up?

Posted
14 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

it wouldn't be hard to fool trump.  You could have a microphone that looks like a microphone and Trump would still blather on about all his crimes.

 

14 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

"Should I even be showing you this?  People say I shouldn't show this around, but do you know what this beautiful thing is? Nobody talks about it, but it's so beautiful and maybe it's against the law to show you, but I'm President, and I can show it to you because I was the top law enforcement officers in the country. Oh yes, I was over the attorney general so that makes me the top."

I mean, y'all are joking, but this is exactly why there are two Bob Woodward books about Trump: Because after the first one came out, only with interviews with people in Trump's circle, Trump was upset that Woodward never spoke to him directly, so he invited Woodward for a do-over, thinking that the second time around would be... better?

Spoiler

it wasn't

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Judge fines Trump $10,000 for violating gag order

From CNN's Jeremy Herb and Lauren del Valle

Donald Trump has been fined $10,000 by a New York judge after appearing to reference a court clerk, in violation of a gag order.

"As the trier of fact, I find that the witness is not credible," Judge Arthur Engoron said after hearing from the former president under oath.

Engoron held a surprise hearing over comments Trump made outside the courtroom earlier Wednesday that could have been referring to a court clerk and therefore violating a gag order.

"I’m going to hold a hearing right now about that," the judge said.

Engoron asked Trump who he was referring to when he talked about the "partisan person" next to the judge.

"You and Cohen," Trump responded, referring to his former attorney and fixer Michael Cohen, who has been testifying Wednesday.

"Are you sure you didn’t meant the person on the other side?" Engoron asked, referring to his clerk.

"Yes I’m sure," Trump responded.

Engoron excused Trump after attorneys from both sides declined to ask him any questions. "The witness is excused," Engoron said.

"Thank you your honor," Trump responded as he returned to his seat at the defense table.

Posted
6 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

"As the trier of fact, I find that the witness is not credible," Judge Arthur Engoron said after hearing from the former president under oath.

lulz.  I hope every judge uses this exact line going forward whenever he is on the stand for anything.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, kevwun said:

I think the 3rd time is going to get him sent to jail.  This Judge doesn't fuck around.

You say that as a certainty.  Surely he will shut his yapper and commit no further violations of the gag order.  He's smart like that.

Also.........🤪 

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Why bother getting him up there to ask him, if you won’t believe him?

I think you have to take evidence and argument to give a nod to due process. 

The risk here for the judge is it looks like personal pique. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...