Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Does this mean he has to sell all his properties in NY immediately?

Heard he owes a bunch on Trump Tower. So selling even that would only net him a small fraction of this fine.

  • Drool 1
Posted

So to recap:

  • Judgment against Trump in NY fraud case:  $354m
  • Judgments against Trump in Carroll case:      $83m
  • Judgment against Giuliani in Georgia case:   $148m
  • Fox settlement in Dominion case:                   $787m
  • Fox judgment in Smartmatic case:                      ?

There may be something to this whole ETTD thing.  Perhaps people will start recognizing the risks of parroting the shit that Trump throws out there?

im-gonna-guess-no-colin-jost.gif

Posted

The Engoron ruling is in.

It’s a 92 page ruling.

At quick glance, there are multiple fines totaling $364 million

Penalties:

Trump banned from doing business in NY state for 3 years.

Trumpkins banned for 2 years.

Details to follow.

It’s big enough to cripple him.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Does this mean he has to sell all his properties in NY immediately?

 

26 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

yeah, it's the basic plot of the west wing.  that administration was entertaining, but not at all productive.

My bet is they do something like create a holding company that he owns the majority stake in but is not an officer.

 

12 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

I'm sure there's a Saudi bank that would be happy to loan it to him. 

Yeah, they have been filling in for Russia because, reasons.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

You're asking for evidence when all we have are a few elections that have swung within the margin of error.  No thanks, dude.

We have so much more evidence than that. I've shared it. You just refuse to consider it for whatever reason.

Posted
6 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

I'm sure there's a Saudi bank that would be happy to loan it to him. 

That was probably his first thought lol. The surety bond companies are going to require full payment to issue the bond anyway - because the chance of success on appeal is low. Whatever the laws pertaining to the origin of the money are...I'm sure his best and brightest are working on it. His business licenses now have an independent monitor though so that will (hopefully?) limit his opportunities to launder through foreign intermediaries, as he did before.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Taylor Swift should publicly offer a $400 million loan. 

“Drop out, bitch, and I’ll just give it to you. You don’t even have to pay it back”

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, TheRealRonWeaver? said:

Melanie should have divorced him sooner. Now she'll have to go back to hooking.

Maybe that is part of his master plan. She gets an onlyfans, all Maga subscribe, win win.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

We have so much more evidence than that. I've shared it. You just refuse to consider it for whatever reason.

I ascribe a strong nefarious bent to your motives.  That's why I don't give a fuck what you say.

Posted
Just now, TheRealRonWeaver? said:

Melanie should have divorced him sooner. Now she'll have to go back to hooking.

There is a sheikh or Russian oligarch ready to be her sugar daddy just to say he fucked a former FLOTUS

  • Like 1
Posted
The Engoron ruling is in.
It’s a 92 page ruling.
At quick glance, there are multiple fines totaling $364 million
Penalties:
Trump banned from doing business in NY state for 3 years.
Trumpkins banned for 2 years.
Details to follow.
It’s big enough to cripple him.
Yeah, but when is anything going to happen? What's taking so long??????


Also, I hope he's thinking that had he just been able to take a little joke at that White House Correspondents' Dinner, he could have been a relatively rich game show host with few headaches and fewer legal issues, especially of the criminal variety.

Lesson definitely not learned though.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

He's not selling a damn thing. Harlan Crow, Elon Musk, Saudis are all going to be tripping over themselves to buy his loyalty

There’s not enough money in the world to buy trump’s loyalty. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, 'stache said:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! EAT SHIT YOU FAT CUNT!!!!!!!

And choke on it, and die, please.

 

Edited by TexArcher
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

 

I'll provide a real world example. Rimbo needs to believe Trump is going lose the way Rimbo needed to believe that Greg Davis was a good offensive coordinator becuase STATS! and that Charlie Strong was a great coach at Texas...right until he fucking wasn't. He then he came to see the inherent dangers and patterns everyone had been telling him about for years. This is how he behaves. I've grown to like the guy as a poster from someone I used to get into it with on what felt like a daily basis, but some of those blind spots continue to exist, as they do in all of us, becuase we're human and actual change is pretty fucking hard. 

That's nice that you see it, but two things.

One, I've learned from my mistakes. Not just that Strong and Davis sucked, but WHY, and that my attitude towards them was all wrong. Which is why, after our first ever CFP appearance with Sark (whom I love and want to succeed) I'm still saying, "Let's see what happens THIS year."

You're finding me far more tolerable because I have actually changed.

Second, I know a lot more about political science and history than I do about football.

The problem here is that I walk into these conversations thinking I'm among peers, saying things like "you're just not paying attention," but most of y'all do NOT have a multi-decade obsession with history and the fall of democracies; you aren't reading thousand-page history books for fun, picking apart the details of every article in the Times, following law blogs and polls and all the stuff that fascinates me. Instead, you have a bunch of Jimmy Jazz: "What evidence? We only have two points of data; the 2016 election and 2020."

That's as frustrating for me to hear as me saying "TRUST TEH CAOCHEZ" was for you when I was barking it 20 years ago. You can't talk to that level of ignorance; you just have to wait it out.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

That's nice that you see it, but two things.

One, I've learned from my mistakes. Not just that Strong and Davis sucked, but WHY, and that my attitude towards them was all wrong. Which is why, after our first ever CFP appearance with Sark (whom I love and want to succeed) I'm still saying, "Let's see what happens THIS year."

You're finding me far more tolerable because I have actually changed.

Second, I know a lot more about political science and history than I do about football.

The problem here is that I walk into these conversations thinking I'm among peers, saying things like "you're just not paying attention," but most of y'all do NOT have a multi-decade obsession with history and the fall of democracies; you aren't reading thousand-page history books for fun, picking apart the details of every article in the Times, following law blogs and polls and all the stuff that fascinates me. Instead, you have a bunch of Jimmy Jazz: "What evidence? We only have two points of data; the 2016 election and 2020."

That's as frustrating for me to hear as me saying "TRUST TEH CAOCHEZ" was for you when I was barking it 20 years ago. You can't talk to that level of ignorance; you just have to wait it out.

Shrug. I'm cheering for you to be right about this...we all are. But no one can predict the future, and there are more than a few troubling things happening at once in this society. I've read the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. I'm sure a history buff such as yourself has as well, and the paralells are striking. So I think you should forgive anyone who doesn't see things the way you see them because, and I'm paraphrasing, YOU "read history books and the news and law blogs and polls." Oh, well in that case, you can't be wrong. You must be the only one. You were just as confident before. I hope you're right. 

If Trump wins I think you should commit to a Futureman style Fisting of yourself. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

The problem here is that I walk into these conversations thinking I'm among peers, saying things like "you're just not paying attention," but most of y'all do NOT have a multi-decade obsession with history and the fall of democracies; you aren't reading thousand-page history books for fun, picking apart the details of every article in the Times, following law blogs and polls and all the stuff that fascinates me. Instead, you have a bunch of Jimmy Jazz: "What evidence? We only have two points of data; the 2016 election and 2020."

So you have a demonstrated multi-decade pattern of misreading the room, but now you're all better?  That's what we're supposed to believe?

  • Haha 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Oh, well in that case, you can't be wrong. You must be the only one. You were just as confident before.

Look, back in the day, you and CTJ would point out things like "GDGD expecting a guard to do a reach block in such-and-such situation" and it might as well have been Swahili for all I understood it. Didn't know what that was, how I could recognize it, or why it was specifically bad in that situation. I bought AFCA Coaching Bibles and subscribed to YouTube channels like Kurt Warner's Studyball and Brett Kollmann.

And after all that... I STILL don't know what it means. BUT, you could explain it to me now, and even if I didn't get what you were saying, I'd recognize that this is MY ignorance that's the problem.

But back then? I didn't even know what I didn't know. So I plowed forwards.

I'm absolutely certain in this case only that I COULD be wrong. Because I know enough about the topic that I know where the boundaries of my predictions and knowledge lie.

But folks yelling at me with the equivalent of "TURST DA CORCHES" isn't going to have much effect on my point of view.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:


If Trump wins I think you should commit to a Futureman style Fisting of yourself. 

Edited 9 minutes ago by SydneyCarton

if Trump wins, we're all getting it in the ass, no matter what I agree to. it would be redundant

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

Look, back in the day, you and CTJ would point out things like "GDGD expecting a guard to do a reach block in such-and-such situation" and it might as well have been Swahili for all I understood it. Didn't know what that was, how I could recognize it, or why it was specifically bad in that situation. I bought AFCA Coaching Bibles and subscribed to YouTube channels like Kurt Warner's Studyball and Brett Kollmann.

And after all that... I STILL don't know what it means. BUT, you could explain it to me now, and even if I didn't get what you were saying, I'd recognize that this is MY ignorance that's the problem.

But back then? I didn't even know what I didn't know. So I plowed forwards.

I'm absolutely certain in this case only that I COULD be wrong. Because I know enough about the topic that I know where the boundaries of my predictions and knowledge lie.

But folks yelling at me with the equivalent of "TURST DA CORCHES" isn't going to have much effect on my point of view.

 

Lol. It may have been Swahili for you to understand, but that never stopped you from going full Mark Twain Rarely Right, Always Confident, as you admit. And in this post you just admitted that you also COULD be wrong now. And no one's going to ask you to change your views. But it is PROBABLY reasonable, for a man who claims to have changed so much, to maybe just maybe tone down the "You are all fucking ignorant dipshits who don't know what the fuck you're talking about or witnessing becuase I voraciously read law blogs" bullshit attitude because you just admitted you could be fucking wrong. 

In light of that, "TURST DA RIMBO" isn't exactly a compelling fucking pitch, even to those of us who can't be your blog reading peers. Maybe try a new approach.

4 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

if Trump wins, we're all getting it in the ass, no matter what I agree to. it would be redundant

Maybe to you. But cathartic for the rest of us. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
Posted
10 minutes ago, Surly Bevo said:

So when do the "truth" rants fire up?  Maybe Trump should eat some corn like that cat so he can shitpost and cornshit at the same time.

Dentures and corn don't mix well.  

Posted
10 minutes ago, Surly Bevo said:

So when do the "truth" rants fire up?  Maybe Trump should eat some corn like that cat so he can shitpost and cornshit at the same time.

I am now questioning my posting decisions on this thread.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Of course this right-wing Trump protecting judge decides to drop this on a Friday afternoon with the hope that by Monday it will be forgotten about. Classic.

Posted
1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:

Maybe that is part of his master plan. She gets an onlyfans, all Maga subscribe, win win.

No matter what MAGA says, the session with the Obama impersonator is going to be her biggest payday.

  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Surly Bevo said:

So when do the "truth" rants fire up?  Maybe Trump should eat some corn like that cat so he can shitpost and cornshit at the same time.

It's begun:

A Crooked New York State Judge, working with a totally Corrupt Attorney General who ran on the basis of “I will get Trump,” before knowing anything about me or my company, has just fined me $355 Million based on nothing other than having built a GREAT COMPANY. ELECTION INTERFERENCE. WITCH HUNT (more to follow!).

The Justice System in New York State, and America as a whole, is under assault by partisan, deluded, biased Judges and Prosecutors. Racist, Corrupt A.G. Tish James has been obsessed with “Getting Trump” for years, and used Crooked New York State Judge Engoron to get an illegal, unAmerican judgment against me, my family, and my tremendous business. I helped New York City during its worst of times, and now, while it is overrun with Violent Biden Migrant Crime, the Radicals are doing all they can to kick me out…..

Page 2: This “decision” is a Complete and Total SHAM. There were No Victims, No Damages, No Complaints. Only satisfied Banks and Insurance Companies (which made a ton of money), GREAT Financial Statements, that didn’t even include the most valuable Asset - The TRUMP Brand, IRONCLAD Disclaimers (Buyer Beware, and Do your Own Due Diligence), and amazing Properties all over the World. All the other side had was a ridiculous $18 million valuation of magnificent Mar-a-Lago, an unConstitutional Gag Order, a Consumer Fraud Statute never before used for this purpose, No Jury allowed, and a refusal to send this disgusting charade to the Commercial Division, where it would have been put to a deserving end…

Page 3: This “case” is OVER ever since the Appellate Division ended it on Statute of Limitations, also letting my daughter Ivanka out of this Witch Hunt. The Democrat Club-controlled Judge Engoron has already been reversed four times on this case, a shameful record, and he will be reversed again. We cannot let injustice stand, and will fight Crooked Joe Biden’s weaponized persecution at every step. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Glad to see he addressed this prior to posting about the case:

The Fake News used Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) to create the picture on the top left. These are despicable people, but everyone knows that. The other pictures are me hitting Golf balls today to show the difference. Sadly, in our Country, Fake News is all you get!

image.thumb.png.862269e2b2d21080543aae462c1cb283.png

 

 



×
×
  • Create New...