Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

 RFK is going to be a greater drag on Trump's numbers. 

Yep. People who like weirdos are just gonna move to the other weirdo after they lost confidence in the first weirdo.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

image.jpeg.a50aa425ca9a11ef8df3f9f6c08e2c5f.jpeg

 

18 minutes ago, immamac said:

Wait is that a Photoshop?

Nope, that aired on broadcast fox. That's why I was describing Walz as "progressive", compared to the boomer mindset and worldview he's ultra leftist. Medical care? Feeding children?? FREE COLLEGE????

He's gonna groom us all!!!! /maga

 

Edit: lmfao goddamnit I just saw the couches line. There WAS a version of this that aired. Fucking internet l

Edited by Captainant
  • Haha 8
Posted
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:

 

Nope, that aired on broadcast fox. That's why I was describing Walz as "progressive", compared to the boomer mindset and worldview he's ultra leftist. Medical care? Feeding children?? FREE COLLEGE????

He's gonna groom us all!!!! /maga

No fucking way!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Thatguy said:

No fucking way!

it's digitally altered, obviously. Taxes on couches? lol  

It came from Reddit

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Js1 said:

it's digitally altered, obviously. Taxes on couches? lol  

It came from Reddit

Fucking God damnit I just saw couches lol. There was a version of this though 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, Captainant said:

Fucking God damnit I just saw couches lol. There was a version of this though 

Yes, they do this all the time.  But this version is fake - couches? Unemployed minors? lol

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Captainant said:

 

Nope, that aired on broadcast fox. That's why I was describing Walz as "progressive", compared to the boomer mindset and worldview he's ultra leftist. Medical care? Feeding children?? FREE COLLEGE????

He's gonna groom us all!!!! /maga

They aired something claiming Walz wants to tax couches?

*edit: everyone settled this just as I posted

Edited by LTbear
Posted
16 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Unemployed minors

Damn right. These layabout kids in my house need some time in the foundry / sweatshop and start contributing to the family. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
You know, a lot of people are saying he's got perfect hands, maybe the strongest hands in the country, I dunno, but that's what they're saying.

Everyone should start talking about Walz’s perfect hands. That’d drive tfg nuts that the 2nd on the opposition ticket was better than him.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Loch Ness Monster said:

NRA not pleased the Dems like camo hats.

Screenshot_20240809_084552_Chrome.thumb.jpg.08e766ede955b704ea3b544f0dba3be3.jpg

Screenshot_20240809_084643_Chrome.thumb.jpg.3bd831d3b85f69175e2a7c8f2b0337ff.jpg

Walz needs to show his closet full of camo. Guaranteed he owns more camo than any GQP politician. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Yes, they do this all the time.  But this version is fake - couches? Unemployed minors? lol

I mean, putting those moochin' street urchins to work is part of the Project 2025 plan, so it seemed like that might be legit.  I was about to do some digging until I saw the couches ...

  • Haha 1
Posted

So this is not scientific at all, but some political scientists / data dorks have noticed you can draw some parallels from the WA House primary results (since everyone gets a ballot to vote in a jungle primary, so it's the most representative of a general election) to the November general election:

2022: D+10 primary results = R+2 national 
2020: D+14 primary results = D+2 national
2018: D+20 primary results = D+7 national (was actually D+8)

As of now, with some trailing mail ballots left to count, it is D+17, which would equate to around a D+5 national environmental for November. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, Old Freak Nasty said:

Popular vote +5 is around the electoral college advantage the GQP holds, right?

 

Biden won by 4.5 nationally.  So I think it's a little less.  Hillary lost while winning by 2.1 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Js1 said:

So this is not scientific at all, but some political scientists / data dorks have noticed you can draw some parallels from the WA House primary results (since everyone gets a ballot to vote in a jungle primary, so it's the most representative of a general election) to the November general election:

2022: D+10 primary results = R+2 national 
2020: D+14 primary results = D+2 national
2018: D+20 primary results = D+7 national (was actually D+8)

As of now, with some trailing mail ballots left to count, it is D+17, which would equate to around a D+5 national environmental for November. 

I'm sorry, that's stupid. There is absolutely zero reason to think the WA house primary is representative of the national likely voting population. Any apparent pattern over the short term is entirely random. 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

So the media demanded Harris answer questions  about policy, she goes over to reporters yesterday to take questions and they all ask her about is Trump

Election 2020 Ok GIF by CBS News

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

You know, I've always said that the Immaculate Contraception was my favorite contraception.  Maybe the best contraception of all time. 

Lets you give her the Franc-Ohhhh face worry-free, if you know what I mean.

  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...