Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

holy shit 😮

i am apparently still capable of being shocked*

 

 

 

 

 

*other than Trump, nothing about him shocks anymore, which i guess is the whole point. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, speed817 said:

Her pleather leggings remind him of his first love...

IMG_20251030_181528_642.thumb.jpg.8e966f6c1e335f786eb7a13609c492e2.jpg

IMG_20251030_181535_974.thumb.jpg.cbe61b4ab82d630f6d7cd45464dd52f5.jpg

Some of you guys really struggle with the question as to whether your wife actually loves and is committed to you. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
1 minute ago, wildcat09 said:

Oh boy, it’s time for Thursday Ana to project all of his insecurities on the rest of the board!

I just hit the ground at AUS and react to what I see. Unsurprised at the most dishonest poster on this board doing his thing. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I just hit the ground at AUS and react to what I see. Unsurprised at the most dishonest poster on this board doing his thing. 

You get to fly in planes domestically? How impressive.

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

4D chess by Usha here. She's gonna cash in with that divorce compensation package, even though it's just couch money for Peter Thiel.  

 

 

The real money will be in the NDA.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
24 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

4D chess by Usha here. She's gonna cash in with that divorce compensation package, even though it's just couch money for Peter Thiel.  

 

 

More likely she'll get the Shelly Miscavige treatment and JD will blame the radical left for her disappearance.

Posted

JD Vance strategically marrying an Indian girl a decade ago and now next in line for the KKK party while getting fondled by a Christian Nationalist widow in fuck me leather pants. 

fuck-ned.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 3
Posted
10 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

 

 

It's not complicated.  He's just another embodiment of the Republican id.  No loyalty to any values or person other than himself.  An entire party built around the virtues of being a sociopath.

Posted (edited)

I'm missing this one. There is actually nothing wrong, if you are a Christian, with remaining married to a non-believer. 

Quote

12 To the rest I say (I, not the Lord) that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. 13 If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. 15 But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace. 16 For how do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?

1 Corinithians 12-16

There are countless people who get married before being born again as Christians and many times it's the wife or the husband only with the other party remaining in unbelief, this isn't all that unique and certainly nothing controversial.

Edited by Vegas64
Posted

If you genuinely subscribe to most small-o orthodox versions of Christianity then hoping/praying for people close to you to share that faith is unsurprising and in fact it would be strange and uncaring not to. 
 

It’s hard to see how talking about it from the second-highest office in world reflects a genuine belief in either the faith or hope that your spouse would join you. It comes off as a manipulative way to explain away a spouse that has become politically inconvenient. 

Posted
20 hours ago, Anastasis said:

Some of you guys really struggle with the question as to whether your wife actually loves and is committed to you. 

Why you gotta call Charlie out like that

Posted
10 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

If you genuinely subscribe to most small-o orthodox versions of Christianity then hoping/praying for people close to you to share that faith is unsurprising and in fact it would be strange and uncaring not to. 
 

It’s hard to see how talking about it from the second-highest office in world reflects a genuine belief in either the faith or hope that your spouse would join you. It comes off as a manipulative way to explain away a spouse that has become politically inconvenient. 

My understanding (and I could be wrong as I've spent about 1 minute caring and reading about it) was that he was asked about it and asked to comment/explain and hence you get the clip.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vegas64 said:

My understanding (and I could be wrong as I've spent about 1 minute caring and reading about it) was that he was asked about it and asked to comment/explain and hence you get the clip.

“My faith and my relationship with my wife is deeply personal and important. Too personal and important to talk about publicly.  I know anyone with a spouse or partner can understand that some things are between two people.” 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

“My faith and my relationship with my wife is deeply personal and important. Too personal and important to talk about publicly.  I know anyone with a spouse or partner can understand that some things are between two people.” 

 

That's a fair response.

I also heard his response he gave and think it was perfectly reasonable as well. Again, where is the controversy?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Vegas64 said:

That's a fair response.

I also heard his response he gave and think it was perfectly reasonable as well. Again, where is the controversy?

Ask a Christian/white Nationalist about any controversy regarding his wife. I’ve read a few disgusting comments from Shitter, and references to those type of remarks here. Most folks are talking about the handsy widow.



×
×
  • Create New...