Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I sweatergawd, every time a DT poster comes in here, it posts some shit that is a dead giveaway that they have sucked up propaganda.

AOC.  Twenty million dollars.  Christ. On. A. Crutch.

Do you fuckers realize what we do with even "lefties" that come in here with such misinformation?

These are the people that turned “faith” into a verb. Unmotivated, ambition-less, lazy fucks that have been given every opportunity to improve themselves intellectually, and [Tywin] they chose to spend their days, as they always have, listening to charlatans and trusting in frauds [/Lannister]

To those of you who are reading and posting from a desktop, you will find more wisdom in the dust under your computer desk that accumulated over the last 24 hours than you ever would reading that silly assed DT shit since the founding of Surly and all its predecessors.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
18 hours ago, RollLeft said:

I know this is the concern for some of you.  Do you know why I'm not concerned because 1) we will never agree to the definition of when we get there so we will never get there 2) the free press 3) the courts 4) we've got too many people like you and others who actually believe this is the fight and are fighting it 5) i don't believe that Trump, even with some people like this in his ear, ultimately wants that. (insert all your kilmar abrego retort here)

For all his faults he's a business man who will sell out ANYONE for his image/ buck.  In the end he knows being a racist klepto has no end game except being a 3rd world country.  So He's doing, right or wrong to you, what he thinks is best for country, which was IN FACT, walking toward economic disaster.  its first and always first about the economy.  That said he has made his personal social views align with half the country who have anti-left social views.  So good for him and those that think like him, i guess.  For too long this country has favored social justice issues over simple economics. It didn't have to be either or but in my opinion we took our eye off the ball for dumb shit for too long. 

As for Trumps family making money on whatever.  IF he's broken the law, prosecute him.  IF not why do you care?  We haven't done much about how AOC a former bar tender is now worth 20million.  The hypocrisy is on both sides. 

This legitimately might the be the worst post I've seen in CR. Completely non-sensical. 

But I do appreciate it, because you're not a bot and we have to accept that Americans actually "think" this way. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, RollLeft said:

I know this is the concern for some of you.  Do you know why I'm not concerned because 1) we will never agree to the definition of when we get there so we will never get there 2) the free press 3) the courts 4) we've got too many people like you and others who actually believe this is the fight and are fighting it 5) i don't believe that Trump, even with some people like this in his ear, ultimately wants that. (insert all your kilmar abrego retort here)

For all his faults he's a business man who will sell out ANYONE for his image/ buck.  In the end he knows being a racist klepto has no end game except being a 3rd world country.  So He's doing, right or wrong to you, what he thinks is best for country, which was IN FACT, walking toward economic disaster.  its first and always first about the economy.  That said he has made his personal social views align with half the country who have anti-left social views.  So good for him and those that think like him, i guess.  For too long this country has favored social justice issues over simple economics. It didn't have to be either or but in my opinion we took our eye off the ball for dumb shit for too long. 

As for Trumps family making money on whatever.  IF he's broken the law, prosecute him.  IF not why do you care?  We haven't done much about how AOC a former bar tender is now worth 20million.  The hypocrisy is on both sides. 

if i had cable maybe

In the span of three sentences you say:

  • Trump will sell out ANYONE for his image/buck
  • He is doing what he thinks is best for the country

IN YOUR OWN FUCKING WORDS you admit that you see what we all do, yet the synapses in your brain force you to somehow try and spin it in a positive direction for the country because he wears the jersey of the political team you root for.  Trump Derangement Syndrome is a real thing, but I suspect most would be disappointed to find out who is ACTUALLY inflicted with it.

Edited by Chuckie Finster
  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

I can't get over this particular part as well: "I know this is the concern for some of you.  Do you know why I'm not concerned because 1) we will never agree to the definition of when we get there so we will never get there"

A constant reminder that a significant number of people truly believe that "perception is reality." This is just a massive failure of critical thinking and basic reasoning. Is it just a form of denial? Deep down are these people scared but unwilling to accept truth as a survival instinct? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Disregarding the fact that IQ is a flawed measurement of "intelligence", I would love to see left/right or Democrat/Republican spectral distributions of IQ.

Hey to the Bell Curve.

Posted
On 7/22/2025 at 5:16 PM, mooseoutfront said:

Fuck that.  It's time to hoist the black flag and start slitting throats.  My grandfather once told me it's not wrong to kill someone that needs to be killed.  He gave me my moral clarity for the situation we now face.  I'm looking forward to the spark that starts it all.  I hope it happens sooner rather than later so I can participate fully.  Getting old sucks.  Valhalla calls.

I guess with no funding NPR radio could just play this on an endless loop comes the spark.  

If any of you are American Revolutionary War history fans, you should be familiar with the Battle of Kings Mountain and how the militia  responded to “Tarleton‘s Quarter”.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

In the span of three sentences you say:

  • Trump will sell out ANYONE for his image/buck
  • He is doing what he thinks is best for the country

IN YOUR OWN FUCKING WORDS you admit that you see what we all do, yet the synapses in your brain force you to somehow try and spin it in a positive direction for the country because he wears the jersey of the political team you root for.  Trump Derangement Syndrome is a real thing, but I suspect most would be disappointed to find out who is ACTUALLY inflicted with it.

Oh, he's one of those that claims to hate all politicians equally.  And he's *very concerned* about the economy.  So *concerned* that he loves the Big Beautiful Buttfucking because it might lower his taxes.  While exploding the deficit and making life very, very hard on the least of us.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Oh, he's one of those that claims to hate all politicians equally.  And he's *very concerned* about the economy.  So *concerned* that he loves the Big Beautiful Buttfucking because it might lower his taxes.  While exploding the deficit and making life very, very hard on the least of us.

Which is why I told him to drop the act.

People who claim to be 1). focused on/familiar with the economy and 2). supportive of Republican economic policies, in reality, do not know shit about the economy. When they say “the economy,” what they’re talking about is what their favorite shock jock commentators order them to believe what’s in their own personal interests. The thing is, they’re just part of a much bigger group of Republican voters who vote against their own interests. 

So when this fucking guy, as others before, comes along and talks about “the economy,” you’re witnessing a performance piece, and a horribly executed one at that. 

Edited by hpslugga
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, hpslugga said:

Which is why I told him to drop the act.

People who claim to be 1). focused on/familiar with the economy and 2). supportive of Republican economic policies, in reality, do not know shit about the economy. When they say “the economy,” what they’re talking about is what their favorite shock jock commentators order them to believe what’s in their own personal interests. The thing is, they’re just part of a much bigger group of Republican voters who vote against their own interests. 

So when this fucking guy, as others before, comes along and talks about “the economy,” you’re witnessing a performance piece, and a horribly executed one at that. 

Oh, I think he's deluded enough to actually believe it, in the context of "muh taxes."

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Oh, I think he's deluded enough to actually believe it, in the context of "muh taxes."

I have no doubt that he believes it. What I object to is this bullshit presentation that he “knows” about the economy and we are just a bunch of group thinking morons.

The  magatards over at the daily Texan very often accuse people in the cloak room of being guilty of group think. No, it’s not group think. it’s just that the things that we say are so obvious and they so desperately do not want to accept them that they waste everyone’s time with these pitiful mental gymnastics performances trying to justify the continuous nonsense that’s perpetrated by this administration. So while the aforementioned beliefs may be sincere, the confidence and the make believe surrounding the idea that they “know” these things, when really what they’re doing is struggling and tripping over themselves, is not.

 

Edited by hpslugga
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted

“The economy” is his personal finances. Lower taxes and lower grocery bills are what constitutes his economy.  There may be some sort of attempt at correlating those things to the general health of the actual economy, with as much rigor as “if it’s good for me it must be good for everyone”

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
As a general proposition, I might not hold bankruptcies against a bidnessman.
But, specific to Trump:  every time he's ventured out of real estate development, he's an abject failure.

False. He’s finally found another business model that works for him quite well: naked corruption and using the power of the office of President for personal enrichment. Grifting. He’s found a second business model called “open and shameless grifting.” And RollLeft thinks that’s GENIUS, good for America, and something he wants to see a lot more of, because it’s “good for the economy” to have someone who will use every policy arm of the country to pursue nothing but personal power and enrichment.
I guess with no funding NPR radio could just play this on an endless loop comes the spark.  
If any of you are American Revolutionary War history fans, you should be familiar with the Battle of Kings Mountain and how the militia  responded to “Tarleton‘s Quarter”.

Fuckin’ A. This.
Stop treating people openly warring against the Republci and its people as normal political actors. They have OPENLY STATED that they want to end the republic as a functioning democracy. Treat them like the fascist enemies that they are. And when they eventually take the inevitable step of engaging in violent attacks against the people…fight back. On OUR terms, not theirs.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
“The economy” is his personal finances. Lower taxes and lower grocery bills are what constitutes his economy.  There may be some sort of attempt at correlating those things to the general health of the actual economy, with as much rigor as “if it’s good for me it must be good for everyone”

Huh. But he even ignored the fact that things like beef, coffee, and sugar are at an ALL-TIME high in price.
The things they claim to care about….they obviously don’t. Which tells you that what REALLY motivates them is something else. Let me spoil that for you: it’s the cruelty and the racism and attacks on political opponents. It’s the fascism. It gives them a raging 3-inch boner, it may be the only thing that does.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
14 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


Huh. But he even ignored the fact that things like beef, coffee, and sugar are at an ALL-TIME high in price.
The things they claim to care about….they obviously don’t. Which tells you that what REALLY motivates them is something else. Let me spoil that for you: it’s the cruelty and the racism and attacks on political opponents. It’s the fascism. It gives them a raging 3-inch boner, it may be the only thing that does.

That’s what 40 years of constant right wing media propaganda has done to people. No matter what actually occurs, Dems are the enemy and want to destroy the country. Whatever the Rs do, the Dems would have been worse in their minds. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Is [mention=1078]RollLeft[/mention] going to return to address his lies regarding AOC? 
Or did he use up all the smugness on his earlier posts?

No, see, he BELIEVES it’s true. Therefore, it’s true to him, and gosh, we’ll just never be able to agree on…matters of objective fact.
These are people who believe in shit like the earth being flat, the moon being made of cheese, etc, and when confronted with plain evidence to the contrary, they respond with “well, agree to disagree.”
They live in a fantastical world of their own idiotic making, and truth and facts only make them angry.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, hpslugga said:

Which is why I told him to drop the act.

People who claim to be 1). focused on/familiar with the economy and 2). supportive of Republican economic policies, in reality, do not know shit about the economy. When they say “the economy,” what they’re talking about is what their favorite shock jock commentators order them to believe what’s in their own personal interests. The thing is, they’re just part of a much bigger group of Republican voters who vote against their own interests. 

So when this fucking guy, as others before, comes along and talks about “the economy,” you’re witnessing a performance piece, and a horribly executed one at that. 



Since the Cold War, Democrat presidents have added 50 million jobs, Republicans 1.9 million.  Go back 100 years, to 1925, and the discrepancy is likely worse, though exact numbers before 1945 are not known. 

Posted
23 hours ago, RollLeft said:

I know this is the concern for some of you.  Do you know why I'm not concerned because 1) we will never agree to the definition of when we get there so we will never get there 2) the free press 3) the courts 4) we've got too many people like you and others who actually believe this is the fight and are fighting it 5) i don't believe that Trump, even with some people like this in his ear, ultimately wants that. (insert all your kilmar abrego retort here)

For all his faults he's a business man who will sell out ANYONE for his image/ buck.  In the end he knows being a racist klepto has no end game except being a 3rd world country.  So He's doing, right or wrong to you, what he thinks is best for country, which was IN FACT, walking toward economic disaster.  its first and always first about the economy.  That said he has made his personal social views align with half the country who have anti-left social views.  So good for him and those that think like him, i guess.  For too long this country has favored social justice issues over simple economics. It didn't have to be either or but in my opinion we took our eye off the ball for dumb shit for too long. 

As for Trumps family making money on whatever.  IF he's broken the law, prosecute him.  IF not why do you care?  We haven't done much about how AOC a former bar tender is now worth 20million.  The hypocrisy is on both sides. 

if i had cable maybe

my fucking god.

Posted
23 hours ago, RollLeft said:

IF he's broken the law, prosecute him. 

He's been prosecuted, a lot. Most of it went away when 80 million of the stupidest fucking people to ever walk the earth thought it would be a good idea to make him president. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
On 7/24/2025 at 2:14 PM, RollLeft said:

I know this is the concern for some of you.  Do you know why I'm not concerned because 1) we will never agree to the definition of when we get there so we will never get there 2) the free press 3) the courts 4) we've got too many people like you and others who actually believe this is the fight and are fighting it 5) i don't believe that Trump, even with some people like this in his ear, ultimately wants that. (insert all your kilmar abrego retort here)

For all his faults he's a business man who will sell out ANYONE for his image/ buck.  In the end he knows being a racist klepto has no end game except being a 3rd world country.  So He's doing, right or wrong to you, what he thinks is best for country, which was IN FACT, walking toward economic disaster.  its first and always first about the economy.  That said he has made his personal social views align with half the country who have anti-left social views.  So good for him and those that think like him, i guess.  For too long this country has favored social justice issues over simple economics. It didn't have to be either or but in my opinion we took our eye off the ball for dumb shit for too long. 

As for Trumps family making money on whatever.  IF he's broken the law, prosecute him.  IF not why do you care?  We haven't done much about how AOC a former bar tender is now worth 20million.  The hypocrisy is on both sides. 

if i had cable maybe

Laffin’ at the notion the US has ever prioritized social justice over its economic interests.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

I don’t even know where to put this but LOLLLL!

https://nondoc.com/2025/07/25/board-members-tv-in-ryan-walters-office-displayed-nude-women-during-executive-session/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLw09pleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHhZ12GnIJDshq1eVRh9j8I8FZq_axEFkq2vIlNGkoHNWaDWQp8QEzwGWVdh7_aem_08HSoRDSg_onQ16X4rs6qw
 

Board members: TV in Ryan Walters’ office displayed nude women during executive session

Two members of the Oklahoma State Board of Education were “shocked and mad” when they saw a video featuring “naked women” on the television screen in Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters’ office during the executive session portion of Thursday’s meeting.

While neither Becky Carson nor Ryan Deatherage could tell what video was displaying nude women on Walters’ office TV, each told NonDoc they were the only people seated in a position to see the screen. Deatherage said he noticed the video first while a parent was speaking about her appeal of a district transfer denial. As Deatherage weighed his options about how to bring the video to the room’s attention, Carson noticed the nudity.

“I was like, ‘What am I seeing?’ I kind of was in shock, honestly. I started to question whether I was actually seeing what I was seeing,” Carson said. “I was like, ‘Is that woman naked?’ And then I was like, ‘No, she’s got a body suit on.’ And it happened very quickly, I was like, ‘That is not a body suit.’ And I hate to even use these terms, but I said, ‘Those are her nipples.’ And then I was looking closer, and I got a full-body view, and I was like, ‘That is pubic hair.’ Even right now, I couldn’t even tell you what I was watching.”

As Carson processed what she was seeing, she said “the mama bear and teacher in me came out” and she “stopped the meeting cold” by confronting Walters.

“I was so disturbed by it, that I was like — very loudly and boastfully, like I was a parent or a teacher — I said, ‘What is on your TV? What am I watching?’ He was like, ‘What? What are you talking about?’ He stood up and saw it. He made acknowledgment that he saw it,” Carson recalled. “And I said, ‘Turn it off. Now.’ And he was like, ‘What is this? What is this?’ So he acknowledged it was inappropriate just by those words. And he was like, ‘I can’t get it to turn off. I can’t figure out how to turn it off.’ And I said, ‘Get it turned off.’ So he finally got it turned off, and that was the end of it. He didn’t address it. He didn’t apologize. Nothing was said.”

While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding.

“I don’t know if he turned it off or switched the channel, I don’t remember,” Deatherage said. “I was surprised that when he came back to the table, he was not apologetic. I didn’t ever hear an apology for that being on, and he didn’t seem to be fazed that it was on.”

Carson said Walters “blew it off” and acted as if he had “just been caught” in an embarrassing situation.

“Like a teenager when you walk in the room and they’re doing something they’re not supposed to be doing,” Carson said.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
I don’t even know where to put this but LOLLLL!
https://nondoc.com/2025/07/25/board-members-tv-in-ryan-walters-office-displayed-nude-women-during-executive-session/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLw09pleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHhZ12GnIJDshq1eVRh9j8I8FZq_axEFkq2vIlNGkoHNWaDWQp8QEzwGWVdh7_aem_08HSoRDSg_onQ16X4rs6qw
 
Board members: TV in Ryan Walters’ office displayed nude women during executive session

Two members of the Oklahoma State Board of Education were “shocked and mad” when they saw a video featuring “naked women” on the television screen in Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters’ office during the executive session portion of Thursday’s meeting.

While neither Becky Carson nor Ryan Deatherage could tell what video was displaying nude women on Walters’ office TV, each told NonDoc they were the only people seated in a position to see the screen. Deatherage said he noticed the video first while a parent was speaking about her appeal of a district transfer denial. As Deatherage weighed his options about how to bring the video to the room’s attention, Carson noticed the nudity.

“I was like, ‘What am I seeing?’ I kind of was in shock, honestly. I started to question whether I was actually seeing what I was seeing,” Carson said. “I was like, ‘Is that woman naked?’ And then I was like, ‘No, she’s got a body suit on.’ And it happened very quickly, I was like, ‘That is not a body suit.’ And I hate to even use these terms, but I said, ‘Those are her nipples.’ And then I was looking closer, and I got a full-body view, and I was like, ‘That is pubic hair.’ Even right now, I couldn’t even tell you what I was watching.”

As Carson processed what she was seeing, she said “the mama bear and teacher in me came out” and she “stopped the meeting cold” by confronting Walters.

“I was so disturbed by it, that I was like — very loudly and boastfully, like I was a parent or a teacher — I said, ‘What is on your TV? What am I watching?’ He was like, ‘What? What are you talking about?’ He stood up and saw it. He made acknowledgment that he saw it,” Carson recalled. “And I said, ‘Turn it off. Now.’ And he was like, ‘What is this? What is this?’ So he acknowledged it was inappropriate just by those words. And he was like, ‘I can’t get it to turn off. I can’t figure out how to turn it off.’ And I said, ‘Get it turned off.’ So he finally got it turned off, and that was the end of it. He didn’t address it. He didn’t apologize. Nothing was said.”

While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding.

“I don’t know if he turned it off or switched the channel, I don’t remember,” Deatherage said. “I was surprised that when he came back to the table, he was not apologetic. I didn’t ever hear an apology for that being on, and he didn’t seem to be fazed that it was on.”

Carson said Walters “blew it off” and acted as if he had “just been caught” in an embarrassing situation.

“Like a teenager when you walk in the room and they’re doing something they’re not supposed to be doing,” Carson said.


That story is not credible. Uptight Repub types would have nude men on their screen.
Posted

This is my favorite part, hahahaha! Some hairy bush lady on a milking table or something. Kinky little shit with his fetish.

While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


That story is not credible. Uptight Repub types would have nude men on their screen.

That's why he acted surprised.  Then again it might have been 'bortion pr0n.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

That's why he acted surprised.  Then again it might have been 'bortion pr0n.

That makes so much sense, HAHAHAHABA. My group texts are wild right now. I haven’t laughed this hard in years!

Posted
7 minutes ago, 'stache said:

This is my favorite part, hahahaha! Some hairy bush lady on a milking table or something. Kinky little shit with his fetish.

While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding.

kinky-tuxedo.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 7/24/2025 at 12:18 PM, RollLeft said:

Neither you or I have the support at our finger tips to support that claim.  Its my opinion based upon my observation.  IMO, you also used to post more rationally.  You've joined the emotional group think on this forum.  You're now part of the gang that likes your comments here.  The bubble supports you.  I'm not here to be contrarian but calling things how i see it.  Agreement or not.  Or, you also can just tell me to fuck right off.    

I’m assuming they will get to the retards sooner rather than later. You’re basically fucked.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TheStoicPaisano said:

Forgot about this guy.

 

Is Trump going to commute this doughy piece of shits sentence? Or worse pardon him?  This fuckers fall from grace is epic.  Criticizes gays, gets outed. Criticizes drag queens, gets outed. Criticizes deceit and dishonesty and then outed as a fraudster.  

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted

And I hate to even use these terms, but I said, ‘Those are her nipples.’ 

 

The fact that there are adults who are embarrassed to say "nipples" is just sad.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, 'stache said:

I don’t even know where to put this but LOLLLL!

https://nondoc.com/2025/07/25/board-members-tv-in-ryan-walters-office-displayed-nude-women-during-executive-session/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLw09pleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHhZ12GnIJDshq1eVRh9j8I8FZq_axEFkq2vIlNGkoHNWaDWQp8QEzwGWVdh7_aem_08HSoRDSg_onQ16X4rs6qw
 

Board members: TV in Ryan Walters’ office displayed nude women during executive session

 

Two members of the Oklahoma State Board of Education were “shocked and mad” when they saw a video featuring “naked women” on the television screen in Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters’ office during the executive session portion of Thursday’s meeting.

While neither Becky Carson nor Ryan Deatherage could tell what video was displaying nude women on Walters’ office TV, each told NonDoc they were the only people seated in a position to see the screen. Deatherage said he noticed the video first while a parent was speaking about her appeal of a district transfer denial. As Deatherage weighed his options about how to bring the video to the room’s attention, Carson noticed the nudity.

“I was like, ‘What am I seeing?’ I kind of was in shock, honestly. I started to question whether I was actually seeing what I was seeing,” Carson said. “I was like, ‘Is that woman naked?’ And then I was like, ‘No, she’s got a body suit on.’ And it happened very quickly, I was like, ‘That is not a body suit.’ And I hate to even use these terms, but I said, ‘Those are her nipples.’ And then I was looking closer, and I got a full-body view, and I was like, ‘That is pubic hair.’ Even right now, I couldn’t even tell you what I was watching.”

As Carson processed what she was seeing, she said “the mama bear and teacher in me came out” and she “stopped the meeting cold” by confronting Walters.

“I was so disturbed by it, that I was like — very loudly and boastfully, like I was a parent or a teacher — I said, ‘What is on your TV? What am I watching?’ He was like, ‘What? What are you talking about?’ He stood up and saw it. He made acknowledgment that he saw it,” Carson recalled. “And I said, ‘Turn it off. Now.’ And he was like, ‘What is this? What is this?’ So he acknowledged it was inappropriate just by those words. And he was like, ‘I can’t get it to turn off. I can’t figure out how to turn it off.’ And I said, ‘Get it turned off.’ So he finally got it turned off, and that was the end of it. He didn’t address it. He didn’t apologize. Nothing was said.”

While both board members described the footage as “retro” in nature but not involving sexual intercourse, Deatherage recalled seeing multiple nude women on the screen and some sort of “chiropractic table.” He found Walters’ reaction to the situation confounding.

“I don’t know if he turned it off or switched the channel, I don’t remember,” Deatherage said. “I was surprised that when he came back to the table, he was not apologetic. I didn’t ever hear an apology for that being on, and he didn’t seem to be fazed that it was on.”

Carson said Walters “blew it off” and acted as if he had “just been caught” in an embarrassing situation.

“Like a teenager when you walk in the room and they’re doing something they’re not supposed to be doing,” Carson said.

That dude is a gay, and he knows it.

  • Like 2


×
×
  • Create New...