Jump to content

Alabama to perform 1st nitrogen gas execution


Recommended Posts

On 1/25/2024 at 10:28 PM, InkaUtexas said:

I think Smith should have been given life without parole, which is what 11 of the Jurors wanted. I guess the judge overruled them.

 

That's not possible.  Under the current constitutional death-penalty regime, the jury must sit for a "penalty phase" the sole issue being death or an alternative sentence, usually LWOP.  The penalty phase must consider evidence of mitigation as well as aggravation and it's these hearings where capital punishment lawyers earn their stripes (or fail their clients), most often.

That jury must be unanimous, as must all criminal juries.\

Late edit.  Mein Gott I was wrong about this.  While all of the above is true and it seems that a judicial override of the jury verdict in the punishment phase is about as contrary to the above as one can imagine, it seems judicial overrides, most especially Alabama's, were not considered and ruled unconstitutional by SCOTUS.  Cert denied something like four times.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the "cosmic question" thing:  something that has influenced me over time on this is a joke told by Jack Ratliff, Texas Civil Procedure professor at UT.

The joke was a voir dire joke in which a potential juror was asked:  could you impose the death penalty if you thought the evidence and law provided for it?  Country fella raises his hand and asks "They do that down in Huntsville right"?  Yessir, they do.  "Well, I suppose if they did it in the evening or on a weekend I could."

So that made me think at the time, "Jesus, I would hate to be on a death-penalty jury."  And my thoughts on it stopped there pretty much.

Over time, though, that thought has expanded into not only should I not have to be on a death-penalty jury, no one should have to be on a death-penalty jury and our law and government should not even provide for such a thing.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I think these notions of diversity maybe drive a little bit of it because that is what seems to underlie the documented American distrust of our fellow citizens that is conspicuously lacking in Scandinavian and more homogeneous societies. 

We seem to be unusually willing to "otherize" people in this country and then demonize them.

Regardless, something is wrong with our culture/society that leads to criminality and our counter-productive response to it.  Part of it is the War on Drugs, but that prompts the question why Americans have such a voracious appetite for drugs.  And that probably relates to our fractured social safety net, which may ouroboros into that otherizing.

And, ultimately, I think the notion of the "american dream" when so many are effectively cut out of it has become increasingly corrosive to our society.

Is the demonizing of others because the others are committing crimes?  Or are the others commiting crimes because they are demonized? 

You suggest drugs as the genesis/catalyst (if we separate drugs from other criminal acts), but then again, the consumption of drugs are caused by…the otherizers?

Lastly, what is your definition of the american dream and why do you think many are cut out of it?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

100000% agree with this. White collar crime is often calculated and pre-meditated over months and years. These people know what they are doing to others and it’s so much more evil to me than a crime of passion. 

Sure, intent and premeditation absolutely matters. Why are you suggesting they’re not already taken into account during sentencing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

100000% agree with this. White collar crime is often calculated and pre-meditated over months and years. These people know what they are doing to others and it’s so much more evil to me than a crime of passion. 

Yeah, I agree with this.  The sort of generic explanation for light sentences for white collar crime is that judges (who sentence in federal court, where most are prosecuted) and prosecutors for that matter, see another educated professional who "made a mistake" or had an "ethical lapse" and to whom any incarceration or punishment may have a greater impact than a common street criminal and thus will be unlikely to recidivate.

I think that's absolutely the wrong approach.  To whom much is given, much should be expected.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AbeFroman said:

I am against killing human beings, against it. ..put that on my bragging montage 

but But I have never understood why we don’t just walk up and shoot them in the back of the head with a Colt 45 revolver.  
 

giphy.gif.7748189f5c9edc136c05d60ea65ed534.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 52-80 said:

Is the demonizing of others because the others are committing crimes?  Or are the others commiting crimes because they are demonized? 

You suggest drugs as the genesis/catalyst (if we separate drugs from other criminal acts), but then again, the consumption of drugs are caused by…the otherizers?

Lastly, what is your definition of the american dream and why do you think many are cut out of it?

I'm saying it is easier for us as a society to dehumanize criminals and thus treat them extra-harshly.  Especially when those criminals come from an "other" group, as they so often do.

It's not my conception of the American dream that matters.  It's people who think they should be advancing when they are not, whether they actually should be or not (as in, are they doing the right things to advance).  I think that leads to an "I'm gonna get mine" attitude and extra frustration when they don't "get theirs" and see others "getting theirs" that in their perception are less-deserving.  Some of this is just flat human nature, not peculiar to the US, but we have more persistent notions of "you can be anything you want in America."

ETA:  addressing your second question last.  Drugs drive a lot of crime, in the form of addiction and in the form of the shadowy commerce that delivers them to our consumers.  Americans have a seemingly endless appetite for drugs.  For addicts, that is probably mostly a genetic predisposition.  For less compulsive users, it would seem to be a need to escape their circumstances.  Drugs are rampant in poverty-stricken areas.  Poverty-stricken people are more likely to become drug dealers and casualties of drug commerce.

Drugs, crime, and poverty are closely associated.  Minorities, others, are also closely associated with the three.  I suspect that notions of the American dream, get rich or die tryin, motivates those in poverty-stricken circumstances to enter the commercial world easily open to them:  drugs.

The margin of error for poverty-stricken others in escaping their circumstances is close to zero.  Far less than, say, upper middle class whiteys like myself.  So, for a variety of reasons, others constitute a disproportionate percentage of our criminal population.  So, not only do they bear the stigma of being criminals, they bear the stigma of being other.  Thus, it is easier to demonize, dehumanize and over-sentence those criminal others.

The War on Drugs has always had racial undertones if not straight-up racist motivations e.g. Nixon, pot, and Negros; later cocaine and dirty brown Colombians; crack and Negros; currently everything and dirty brown Messkins.  So, super-easy for pandering pols to whip up fear of drugs and their "other: purveyors and come up with ultra-punitive measures instead of a more rational and compassionate attempt to address the demand.

Our social dysfunction drives crime, which drives more social dysfunction.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

First reports from witnesses. Not going to post. It is not an easy read.

https://www.the-sun.com/news/10195272/alabama-supreme-court-nitrogen-gas-execution-method/

Two things:

  1. How could it be such a violent execution when nitrogen is the most abundant gas in our atmosphere? /s
  2. The son of the murder-for-hire pastor and his murdered momma certainly sounds like he's taken Christ's word to heart. /s
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love all the comments that life in prison is actually a harsher penalty than death. If that's the case then why do all these fuck wads do all these appeals. And I love this murderer lecturing the rest of us about humanity taking a step backwards. Fuck this dead mother fucker.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I just don’t want multiple-time felons in my town. For sure not violent felons. Not even property crime felons.  The stats on recidivism are off the charts. 

You'd never make it as the Travis County DA with that attitude, mister. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deej said:

You'd never make it as the Travis County DA with that attitude, mister. 

I may have too much faith but I think it would be easier to get longer sentences if prisons were humane and we explained it as “we aren’t punishing them we are just keeping them separate from potential victims.”

I get as ragey as anyone else when multiple time convicted felons kill people and hurt people.  So take away the talking point of prison being cruel. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

I'm saying it is easier for us as a society to dehumanize criminals and thus treat them extra-harshly.  Especially when those criminals come from an "other" group, as they so often do.

Doesn't seem unnatural, unethical, or unfair to consider a person who commits heinous crimes -- such as, oh, murder -- in lower regard than the rest of society.  If the argument is that it's *too* harsh, we're gonna need to first establish the baseline of what is harsh enough. 

 

46 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Yeah, I agree with this.  The sort of generic explanation for light sentences for white collar crime is that judges (who sentence in federal court, where most are prosecuted) and prosecutors for that matter, see another educated professional who "made a mistake" or had an "ethical lapse" and to whom any incarceration or punishment may have a greater impact than a common street criminal and thus will be unlikely to recidivate.

I think that's absolutely the wrong approach.  To whom much is given, much should be expected.

A pretty important distinction is that white collar crime don't cause immediate physical harm, and damages are recoverable.  Same can't be said for for a guy who beats his neighbor half to death.  Whom would you rather live next to?

(FWIW, I find white collar / financial fraud equally detestable.  Is there an example where we would disagree on the lightness of sentencing?)

 

18 minutes ago, cabowabo said:

I love all the comments that life in prison is actually a harsher penalty than death. If that's the case then why do all these fuck wads do all these appeals. And I love this murderer lecturing the rest of us about humanity taking a step backwards. Fuck this dead mother fucker.

What happened with the Alabama guy was inhumane.  He should have been treated with dignity -- like his victim, who was beaten with a fire poker before being stabbed to death.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 52-80 said:

What happened with the Alabama guy was inhumane.  He should have been treated with dignity -- like his victim, who was beaten with a fire poker before being stabbed to death.

IMO, at this point in human society we should be able to rise above a base instinct of revenge and glee at inflicting pain upon someone because they inflicted pain upon someone else.  I get the idea of Hammurabi's Code.  I view it as uncivilized and from a more brutal epoch than we live in now.  Perhaps you disagree.

  • Hook 'Em 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 52-80 said:

What happened with the Alabama guy was inhumane.  He should have been treated with dignity -- like his victim, who was beaten with a fire poker before being stabbed to death.

Do you want to be better than a guy that does that type of thing, or no better than him?  Because “do to him like he did to them” puts forward that you are comfortable with that level of violence and cruelty, for people you deem deserving of it. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Helobious said:

Texas doesn’t do last meal requests anymore. Not sure if Alabama does. 

They should be forced to eat Jade's chili for their last meal. I don't care how inhumane it is. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

i don't believe you can say a "reform-based" approach has ever been seriously attempted in the US, assuming you mean "rehabilitation" based.

The only things we've really done, on a limited scale, are "diversion courts," such as drug, mental-health, and veteran's courts and they are reasonably successful.  And those are maybe 20-25 years old at the outside.

American criminal law was mostly static in terms of sentencing for the first about 200 years, the major development being movement from common-law to statutory crimes.  At some point, fear developed and politicians moved to exploit that fear with ever-longer sentences, and, of course, the War on Drugs.

We swerved heavily into a rehabilitation-based approach in the 1950s and '60s (particularly in states like California, but aspects were nationwide) and largely abandoned it by the 70s and deemed it a failed experiment.  I agree with the sentiment that we didn't really give it a serious attempt.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Do you want to be better than a guy that does that type of thing, or no better than him?  Because “do to him like he did to them” puts forward that you are comfortable with that level of violence and cruelty, for people you deem deserving of it. 

Why are you even asking the question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, as always, they're probably not moving into your upper-middle-class neighborhood, so most (not all) crime is going to be a fairly remote proposition for most of us here.

I agree most of us are insulated from the crime, as the lower class will be most affected. So the next question is: what do you suppose those people think about the death penalty, and police presence?
 

 

1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Do you want to be better than a guy that does that type of thing, or no better than him?  Because “do to him like he did to them” puts forward that you are comfortable with that level of violence and cruelty, for people you deem deserving of it. 

Im comfortably perched far away on my middle class high horse. Lets first ask the immediate parties involved how they feel:

Son #1: “Some of these people out there say, ‘Well, he doesn’t need to suffer like that,’” Well, he didn’t ask Mama how to suffer. They just did it. They stabbed her multiple times.”  

Son #2: “It doesn’t matter to me how he goes out, so long as he goes,” he said, noting that Mr. Smith had been in prison “twice as long as I knew my mom.”

So back to how I think about it: in the context of the 25,000 homicides that occur in america every year, to question (rhetorically or not) whether I am “no better than that”, or to be deeply concerned about the manner with which 25 people are punished….is missing the forest for the twig. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

So back to how I think about it: in the context of the 25,000 homicides that occur in america every year, to question (rhetorically or not) whether I am “no better than that”, or to be deeply concerned about the manner with which 25 people are punished….is missing the forest for the twig. 

You know, it's entirely possible to care about . . . everybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 52-80 said:

I agree most of us are insulated from the crime, as the lower class will be most affected. So the next question is: what do you suppose those people think about the death penalty, and police presence?
 

 

Im comfortably perched far away on my middle class high horse. Lets first ask the immediate parties involved how they feel:

Son #1: “Some of these people out there say, ‘Well, he doesn’t need to suffer like that,’” Well, he didn’t ask Mama how to suffer. They just did it. They stabbed her multiple times.”  

Son #2: “It doesn’t matter to me how he goes out, so long as he goes,” he said, noting that Mr. Smith had been in prison “twice as long as I knew my mom.”

So back to how I think about it: in the context of the 25,000 homicides that occur in america every year, to question (rhetorically or not) whether I am “no better than that”, or to be deeply concerned about the manner with which 25 people are punished….is missing the forest for the twig. 

Thinks Republican Jesus would definitely say. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

You know, it's entirely possible to care about . . . everybody.

Sure it is.
 

But there’s order and rank in the world. And of the 7 billion of these…everybody, the 25 souls on DR — all of whom are convicted murderers — slot on my Careometer somewhere between Yahya Sinwar and Fudge Nuggets. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I don't care how you rank them.  Are you of the opinion that murdering anyone is acceptable?  (I mean, besides Aggies.)

I know you seek a binary answer with how you frame the question, because its easier.

My opinion is that (1) state-sponsored executions of convicted murderers is bad, superficially.

(2) Knowing that applies to 25 people annually, who have on an average sentencing period of 20 years with which to seek appeal/exxoneration/pardon….its dead last on my list of injustices, and im not going to feign outrage over it to win social capital. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, cabowabo said:

I love all the comments that life in prison is actually a harsher penalty than death. If that's the case then why do all these fuck wads do all these appeals. And I love this murderer lecturing the rest of us about humanity taking a step backwards. Fuck this dead mother fucker.

Easy answer.  The prospect of being put to death is more frightening than the prospect of life in prison.  The reality may be much different.

Moreover, death penalty appeals are virtually mandatory and in some states actually mandatory.  Capital defendants usually aren't the brightest bunch. so it's not like they're making a real difficult decision:  the appeal will usually cost them nothing and a lot of people are urging them to do it.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

I'm against the death penalty, for all the general reasons that I won't get into. 

But I'm not going to lose any sleep over this guy getting the death penalty. 

The previous 4 persons who were executed:

-guy with history of kidnapping, theft, domestic abuse, etc, carjacks 80 y/o woman, throws her in the trunk, then shoots her in the head

-guy asks a good samaritan for a ride, gets in the car, then stabs him in the neck

-convicted sex offender kidnaps 5 y/o girl, clubs her in head, strangles her with a bag, then dumps her burned and naked body

-guy conspires to break into someones house, fully prepped weapon, shoots him in the head and a total of 11 times

-guy previously convicted of manslaughter, does meth with 2 other dudes, then shoots both, including execution style where one was already wounded and pleading for his life

 

But you know whos the real bad person here? You - if you dont lose sleep over any of them either. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 52-80 said:

The previous 4 persons who were executed:

-guy with history of kidnapping, theft, domestic abuse, etc, carjacks 80 y/o woman, throws her in the trunk, then shoots her in the head

-guy asks a good samaritan for a ride, gets in the car, then stabs him in the neck

-convicted sex offender kidnaps 5 y/o girl, clubs her in head, strangles her with a bag, then dumps her burned and naked body

-guy conspires to break into someones house, fully prepped weapon, shoots him in the head and a total of 11 times

-guy previously convicted of manslaughter, does meth with 2 other dudes, then shoots both, including execution style where one was already wounded and pleading for his life

 

But you know whos the real bad person here? You - if you dont lose sleep over any of them either. 

The only issue I have with this is that they didn’t give the father of the 5 year old 20 minutes alone with the piece of shit before they executed him. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2024 at 8:22 AM, cabowabo said:

I love all the comments that life in prison is actually a harsher penalty than death. If that's the case then why do all these fuck wads do all these appeals. And I love this murderer lecturing the rest of us about humanity taking a step backwards. Fuck this dead mother fucker.

I don’t think life in prison is a harsher penalty than death but I do think it’s insane that we allow the state to kill people based on the opinion of 12 regular ass morons.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think life in prison is a harsher penalty than death but I do think it’s insane that we allow the state to kill people based on the opinion of 12 regular ass morons.

….but…and this is important…we also cannot let 12 of THAT EXACT SAME POOL OF MORONS award money damaged against someone, because that’s too important! Runaway juries! Tort reform!
Even better? The overlap between the group of people who support the death penalty and those who support taking damages awards out of juries’ hands is around 99%.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...