Jump to content

NSIAP: Amazon HQ2, more jobs and traffic jams


Grippe

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

all of those people have to live somewhere and will travel throughout the area.  make no mistake, no matter where in the austin area, it will be a major strain to the area.

It will but as a property owner and commuter I would also like it but my reasons are selfish because I’m in tech industry and my salary and benefits would go up with this much competition and it would open up more opportunities down the road for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

this opportunity would be great for any city.  however, i don't think people outside of austin realize just how much the people who live in the austin area DO NOT want this.  the economic boom would not make up for all the shit that would go with it, namely even higher housing costs and an absolute kick in the balls to traffic.

i dunno, i've spoken to a lot more people who want it here than don't want it here. would be interesting to see a poll taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 'stache said:

If people don't want it in Austin, shouldn't they be more angry at the city for not improving public transit and infrastructure to keep up with the growth?

Austin is very unique in that we have this belief that if you don't ever do anything to solve or plan for a problem, then the problem simply does not exist. It is a truly blissful feeling of ignorance.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crash_davis said:

this opportunity would be great for any city.  however, i don't think people outside of austin realize just how much the people who live in the austin area DO NOT want this.  the economic boom would not make up for all the shit that would go with it, namely even higher housing costs and an absolute kick in the balls to traffic.

I'm all for it.  I'll pay higher property taxes -- it means my equity went up.

"I got mine".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

I’d be pissed and jealous as hell as a Houstonian if that happened. One or the other great, but both as split HQ would sting. Like when Top Chef came to Texas and went to SA, Dallas and Austin not Houston just like with In-N-Out too.

"Houston is a cruel, crazy town on a filthy river in East Texas with no zoning laws and a culture of sex, money and violence. It's a shabby, sprawling metropolis ruled by brazen women, crooked cops and super-rich pansexual cowboys who live by the code of the West -- which can mean just about anything you need it to mean, in a pinch."

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be pissed and jealous as hell as a Houstonian if that happened. One or the other great, but both as split HQ would sting. Like when Top Chef came to Texas and went to SA, Dallas and Austin not Houston just like with In-N-Out too.


Ya it would be jussttt like that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will but as a property owner and commuter I would also like it but my reasons are selfish because I’m in tech industry and my salary and benefits would go up with this much competition and it would open up more opportunities down the road for me.
Pretty much how I feel at this point
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So business insider points out that this entire process by amazon was just a sham.   How in the fuck can you have two "equal" headquarters if its actually 1 HQ and two  "1/2" HQ's?  by definition, half a HQ is not equal to a full HQ.

it was all just a ploy to see how much each city would whore itself out for the highest cost, and instead of getting a HQ as promised, the "winners" get 2 satellite offices, and still give Amazon all the tax benefits as if it was a real HQ2

 

https://www.thisisinsider.com/amazon-splitting-hq2-reveals-contest-was-a-sham-2018-11

 

Critics of Amazon's long-drawn-out HQ2 selection process already questioned that a "second headquarters" could even exist. Dividing the project into two equal-size headquarters just adds more fuel to the argument that the entire process was a ploy to pit cities against one another to maximize incentives.

It also breaks Amazon's original mandate for the project that HQ2 would be a "full equal" to the company's Seattle headquarters. If it's separate, it's not equal.

Amazon hyped up its HQ2 investment so much that cities were willing to do anything for the chance of landing it. Amazon probably at least figured that into its calculus, and when it realized it would be easier to count the cities that didn't jump at the chance to have Amazon in the backyard, the strategy shifted to just maximizing gains.

While we don't yet know what tax incentives were offered up for Amazon to select these two cities, nor what Amazon offered up in return, we can safely assume it totaled in the billions.

City and state leaders jumped at the chance for what they saw as a high-profile win — and obvious benefit that constituents would see and appreciate. The upsides for local communities and governments — economic or otherwise — are now not so immediately obvious.

If Amazon is able to get away with essentially robbing Virginia and New York of millions in tax revenue and not even offering up in return what they originally promised, what else are they capable of?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AUS-97HORN said:

So business insider points out that this entire process by amazon was just a sham.   How in the fuck can you have two "equal" headquarters if its actually 1 HQ and two  "1/2" HQ's?  by definition, half a HQ is not equal to a full HQ.

it was all just a ploy to see how much each city would whore itself out for the highest cost, and instead of getting a HQ as promised, the "winners" get 2 satellite offices, and still give Amazon all the tax benefits as if it was a real HQ2

 

https://www.thisisinsider.com/amazon-splitting-hq2-reveals-contest-was-a-sham-2018-11

 

 

 

Also: water is wet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t get them bypassing Texas with a lower cost of living and no income tax for 2 locations that are amongst the most expensive in the country and bypassing the the entire middle of the country.
Easier to recruit and maintain that large of a tech workforce in those two locations. Amazon doesn't pay taxes and they will pay their talent, which skews predominabtly younger and probably prefers DC/NYC to Texas, enough that income taxes aren't a huge concern. Also, it's been reported several times that they were interested in an east coast presence.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2018 at 7:21 PM, gmr548 said:

Easier to recruit and maintain that large of a tech workforce in those two locations. Amazon doesn't pay taxes and they will pay their talent, which skews predominabtly younger and probably prefers DC/NYC to Texas, enough that income taxes aren't a huge concern. Also, it's been reported several times that they were interested in an east coast presence.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 

They also wanted mass transit. Texas doesnt have it.  And with the split between 2 large cities, they probably won't have to do too much nationwide recruiting or pay relocation expenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...