Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Dnaguy said:


Trump hasn't ruled a lot of things out.

Why?

to rule something out you must:

A.) Know said thing exists

B.) Know that it is an option you can access / choose

C.) Understand the consequences of your actions / choice.


It would be charitable to assume that Trump has all three of these elements on any subject…. At all. Maybe on issues that directly affect him right now, at this second. But anything past this minute, hour, day? Nah. 

It cannot be stressed enough that this man has no morality, values, or belief in anything other than himself.

He would allow his own grandchildren to be drown in hydrofluoric acid if it spared him from any pain or suffering.

He’d probably pay you to drown Eric in hydrofluoric acid.  

Posted
6 hours ago, LCHorn said:

 

Look, at risk of beating a dead horse further on it, I'm a little surprised that the idea that Iran wasn't complying with the JCPOA is controversial or would require I name my source further in order to justify that I believe it to be true.  

To @RomaVicta point, I'm an OIF veteran and have a few connections in that community, including amongst those that have also worked or attended UT.  One of those happens to be retired but is considered to be a subject matter expert on global intelligence matters, if not the middle east specifically.  There isn't anything I've written that I would consider in the national interest to keep confidential and I'm also confident that my friend wouldn't share anything that would be considered a security risk if it were passed.  

That said, I offered it in the spirit of better understanding the conflict--if you don't want to believe it, that's okay.  I'm not here for the collection of internet points, I just like the conversation even if I don't agree with someone.  

 

Thanks for the response, LC. I truly had no notion of your background. 

Hook 'Em

Posted

Sounds like bunker busters deployed if Furdow was a target. Super curious to see if they worked. So far from what I understand it their efficacy on a fortified bunker that deep was theoretical..

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

It will be amusing depressing to watch all the GQP lackeys like MTG praise trump for his courage, two days after unequivocally stating we have no reason to get involved in the war with Iran. Even Cucker will find a way to praise it eventually. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Blotto said:

It will be amusing depressing to watch all the GQP lackeys like MTG praise trump for his courage, two days after unequivocally stating we have no reason to get involved in the war with Iran. Even Cucker will find a way to praise it eventually. 

Lol wdym dude, 90% or more of the Democrats are going to do the exact same thing. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

When he starts whining about Biden, will it be Robot Biden or one of the other MAGA parallel universes that has the real Biden?

It will be the universe with the the BOMBS.

Posted

Heard the announcers on the CWS say something and got over here to see what was up.

There's a zero percent chance of me listening to the blithering idiot saying what a success it was.

I guess we'll see what happens next. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Vegas64 said:

Sounds like bunker busters deployed if Furdow was a target. Super curious to see if they worked. So far from what I understand it their efficacy on a fortified bunker that deep was theoretical..

Didn't do shit in Tora Bora.

ETA: Well, maybe we didn't use it there.  Could have sworn we did.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
15 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

I'm sure this will be reassuring.

 

 

 

I can't think of a worse person to lead us through...well...anything.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, RexWilson said:

Usually Trump’s two weeks timeline gets exceeded.  I’m not used to him doing something early. 

Pretty sure he gave that timeline specifically so he could deviate from it to show everybody that he's in charge.

Posted
35 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Didn't do shit in Tora Bora.

ETA: Well, maybe we didn't use it there.  Could have sworn we did.

I’m pretty sure the forces ready to obliterate OBL were ordered to stand down prior to his escape. Draw your own conclusions on why

Posted
7 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Pretty sure he gave that timeline specifically so he could deviate from it to show everybody that he's in charge.

That and magats will use it as an example of his negotiating style with a rope a dope 

Just now, Bullneck said:

Color me surprised:

image.thumb.png.db345e548b8e5f02cf7bc81a8c522324.png

They’ve basically all changed their tune and now support it. Totally not a cult tho

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Pretty sure he gave that timeline specifically so he could deviate from it to show everybody that he's in charge.

I think being TACO got to him.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Derka said:

he is an actual imbecile. i mean what the hell was even that? i am so, so, so mad at the abject fucking morons who elected this fool.

Pos rep for use of imbecile. Underutilized word that is a perfect description of Trump. I do see on Google where its use has trended up in recent years. Probably just a coincidence.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

I wonder what future war we'll get dragged into when terrorists inevitably attack us for this shit.  Since we never actually go after the right people, I'm sure it'll be Turkey or Egypt or some shit.  They got some oil hiding under the pyramids, right?  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

They’ve basically all changed their tune and now support it. Totally not a cult tho

Yeah, I scrolled down to the bottom of the page and saw it was already 100+ pages long an two weeks old.  I guess they changed the name of the thread.

Posted (edited)

You always knew Trump was going to start a war with someone.  He's too much of a pussy not to.

3 minutes ago, SpiralOut said:

I wonder what future war we'll get dragged into when terrorists inevitably attack us for this shit.  Since we never actually go after the right people, I'm sure it'll be Turkey or Egypt or some shit.  They got some oil hiding under the pyramids, right?  

No way! We have Top Men in the intelligence community working in shifts to keep us safe.  I'm sure Elmmo will hep us out for a price. 

 

 

Edited by Bullneck
Posted

Im laughing my ass off at all those who think Irans retaliation is gonna be anything but a guerilla/terrorist-type bomb(ing) on the US now

 

I slightly worried that we are more at risk for a terror attack now than any time post-9/11

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

I'm sure this will be reassuring.

 

 

 

It should have been obvious to everybody that when Trump publicly disagreed with his DNI about Iran’s nuclear intentions, he would as accede to BIbi’s request to bomb Iranian nuclear installations.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3


×
×
  • Create New...