Jump to content

45 indicated


Cairn Horn88

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Why does this piece of shit have a mile-long motorcade?  It should be 3 cars, at the most. 

you got your Big Mac Escalade, you got your nappy Escalade, you got the Escalade for used nappies.....it adds up pretty quickly.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Michael Knight said:

Also lol at that Trump/Desantis sign, but there's no such thing as shame anymore so there's a not 0% chance of happening

I fully expect it actually. They've probably been negotiating it through surrogates for months. I've suspected the public feud has been kayfabe for a long time. The media coverage of a contested primary is far better for all involved than the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?  This is the turnout?  Fucking bullshit.  Can’t have a friendly fire mass murder-suicide by false flag conspiracy of the same 20 fucking people know one another.  This is why we can’t have nice things!

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

@TwiceHorn just what does this mean and is it accurate?

Quote

e) PROHIBITION ON DISCLOSURE OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION BY DEFENDANT, RELIEF FOR DEFENDANT WHEN UNITED STATES OPPOSES DISCLOSURE.—

(1) Whenever the court denies a motion by the United States that it issue an order under subsection (c) and the United States files with the court an affidavit of the Attorney General objecting to disclosure of the classified information at issue, the court shall order that the defendant not disclose or cause the disclosure of such information. (2) Whenever a defendant is prevented by an order under paragraph (1) from disclosing or causing the disclosure of classified information, the court shall dismiss the indictment or information; except that, when the court determines that the interests of justice would not be served by dismissal of the indictment or information, the court shall order such other action, in lieu of dismissing the indictment or information, as the court determines is appropriate. Such action may include, but need not be limited to—

(A) dismissing specified counts of the indictment or information;

(B) finding against the United States on any issue as to which the excluded classified information relates; or

(C) striking or precluding all or part of the testimony of a witness. An order under this paragraph shall not take effect until the court has afforded the United States an opportunity to appeal such order under section 7, and thereafter to withdraw its objection to the disclosure of the classified information at issue.

(f) RECIPROCITY.—Whenever the court determines pursuant to subsection (a) that classified information may be disclosed in connection with a trial or pretrial proceeding, the court shall, unless the interests of fairness do not so require, order the United States to provide the defendant with the information it expects to use to rebut the classified information. The court may place the United States under a continuing duty to disclose such rebuttal information. If the United States fails to comply with its obligation under this subsection, the court may exclude any evidence not made the subject of a required disclosure and may prohibit the examination by the United States of any witness with respect to such information.

 

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 

SEC. 7. (a) An interlocutory appeal by the United States taken before or after the defendant has been placed in jeopardy shall lie to a court of appeals from a decision or order of a district court in a criminal case authorizing the disclosure of classified information, imposing sanctions for nondisclosure of classified information, or

refusing a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the disclosure of classified information.

(b) An appeal taken pursuant to this section either before or during trial shall be expedited by the court of appeals. Prior to trial, an appeal shall be taken within ten days  after the decision or order appealed from and the trail shall not commence until the appeal is resolved. If an appeal is taken during trial, the trial court shall adjourn the trial until the appeal is resolved and the court of appeals

(1) shall hear argument on such appeal within four days of the adjournment of the trial,  

(2) may dispense with written briefs other than the supporting materials previously submitted to the trial court,

(3) shall render its decision within four days of argument on appeal,  and

(4) may dispense with the issuance of a written opinion in rendering its decision. Such appeal and decision shall not affect the right of the defendant, in a subsequent appeal from a judgment of conviction to claim as error reversal by the trial court on remand of a ruling appealed from during trial.

 

I haz a Freedom Boner.  Less chance of delay fuckery

Edit: I do not mean to say that she cannot fuck with other motions and jury selection and other issues. But at least she cannot fuck with the core contents of the classified documents, and how they are treated by the court.At least not without an 11th Circuit Bench Slap. 

Edited by Gatorubet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

Yep. Everybody there is grifting and hoping to get a bunch of likes on their IG/Facebook/twitter. The guy with a pighead doesn't seem to have a phone, but everybody else seems to be livestreaming/tweeting/whatever.

I'm surprised Boebert, MTG, Lindell, etc. aren't there livestreaming.  Almost as if they don't actually give a shit about Trump the man.

2 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

Seriously?  This is the turnout?  Fucking bullshit.  Can’t have a friendly fire mass murder-suicide by false flag conspiracy of the same 20 fucking people know one another.  This is why we can’t have nice things!

The ones who truly would want to start shit either showed up on January 6 and then lost jobs and got felonies, or watched the ones who showed up on January 6 lose jobs/get felonies.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Chooky said:

"There are lots of other places to take a shit at in Mar a Lago."  Boom.  You just got legal'd.


per person who has spent many days in mir a  lago …. That bathroom is in a room that people play cards in. Anyone can play cards in that room 

😂😂😂😂😂

Edited by tx 3 putt
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

I fully expect it actually. They've probably been negotiating it through surrogates for months. I've suspected the public feud has been kayfabe for a long time. The media coverage of a contested primary is far better for all involved than the opposite.

For how many suburban women would Ron DeSantis on the ticket be enough to turn them in Trump’s favor, especially when a) Trump said he’d pick a female running mate and b) he was recently found liable for sexual assault and defamation of E. Jean Carroll? I’m thinking none. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I'm surprised Boebert, MTG, Lindell, etc. aren't there livestreaming.  Almost as if they don't actually give a shit about Trump the man.

They didn’t get the publicity/accolades/fundraising they were expecting when they showed up for the porn star payout arraignment in NYC so they’re not bothering this time around. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

I sincerely doubt that.  Isn't Parlatore out?

He is.  Although I think Trump's legal team has been seeking the GJ material for quite some time.  I think it is unavailable until an indictment is filed and probably would not have been made available to them even yet.

Smith is aggressive, but I don't think he would have crossed any lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • blacklab changed the title to 45 indicated


×
×
  • Create New...