Jump to content

What does college football look like in 20 years?


Guest

Recommended Posts

With the conference realignment, the opening up of NIL, and the ease of transfers, the game is completely different than it was a decade ago:

image.png.0f2f132f8e356f7a090d2a3e701d2c00.png
image.png.303748cecbe3acb089fdaec77459a7d9.png


It's obvious that we are just at the start of this new era of football where conferences can be across the nation, players are making millions in college, and "school pride" takes a backseat to doing what's the absolute best for your current earnings and potentially making it to the league.

So what does the game look like in another 20 years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

So what does the game look like in another 20 years? 

I am curious if the end game is two forty school super leagues or four 20 school super leagues.

But I feel like the playoff gives the ACC and Big 12 a good chance to survive as viable second tier leagues. 

Otherwise I think things will become more and more professionalized. I do wonder if players will eventually start signing contracts to play for a school for a certain amount of time to prevent all the transfers.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Players are going to unionize 

That would be interesting. Would there be separate Big 10 and SEC Unions? Or a Big 10/Big 12/ACC/SEC Union? Or an all of FBS Union? The latter would be kind of wild considering the huge differences between a player at, say, Fresno State vs Georgia.

Edited by Valmy77
  • Prepare your anus 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

I am curious if the end game is two forty school super leagues or four 20 school super leagues.

But I feel like the playoff gives the ACC and Big 12 a good chance to survive as viable second tier leagues. 

Otherwise I think things will become more and more professionalized. I do wonder if players will eventually start signing contracts to play for a school for a certain amount of time to prevent all the transfers.

I lean toward four 20 team leagues is probably where things settle. (2 auto bids to the playoff for each and 4 at-large based on committee selection (seeding also set by committee)

Agree that a contract between player and school is probably coming in an attempt to slow down the transfer whirlwind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything that's happened over the last several years has been moving toward two superconferences.  Why would things suddenly start shifting toward four conferences?  Does anyone really think the SEC or Big 10 will allow themselves to be cleaved in half?

I think we'll end up with two conferences of 24 to 28 teams, max.  

And the rest of college football will be for local bragging rights.  

I think there will be more parity in recruiting among the top 25 or so teams than we've seen recently.  And everyone who isn't in the two superconferences will turn into absolute garbage football programs, because they won't be able to recruit for shit.  I can't wait to watch it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, players at the major programs should receive a cut of the school's TV revenue instead of NIL donations from private sources... I doubt big money donors have the stamina to keep up the endless stream of NIL contributions. And asking the average fan to fund the roster's payroll is absurd when the program makes 100s of millions a year. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

The playoff. Top 6 ranked conference champs get autobids. 

Obviously, I'm predicting that won't be the case in 20 years.

There are going to be a bunch more UGA/TCU looking scores in the playoff.  And every conference that isn't the Big 10 or SEC is going to see its recruiting drop off in a big way.  In 5 years, it'll be 2 ultra power conferences and a bunch of Conference USA's.  The playoff qualifications will get changed at some point between then and 20 years out, because of the farce it will be to have 4 shit conference champions in the playoff when everybody knows they couldn't beat anybody in the top half of the two superconferences.

This is a guess, obv, but that's all any of us is doing.  Everything that's happened and is happening points to 2 superconferences, and an even bigger gulf between them and the others than we'll start with next year.

Edited by TexArcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SEC and Big 10 combine (for football only) and negotiate as one unit for a TV deal, spread out over multiple networks.  They each form smaller, regional-based divisions where everyone plays each other, the winners of which get automatic playoff spots.  There are of course wild cards for the best records among the non-division winners. Conference championships are eliminated. Playoffs are only among Big 10 and SEC schools. Who gives a fuck about the smaller shitty schools?  They can go do their own thing.  Basically, everything is structured like the NFL, NBA, MLB, etc, which is what we are heading toward anyway.  

This is probably not what will happen, but what should happen given that there is no putting the toothpaste back in the tube with paying players and free agency.  Multiple mega conferences make no sense in this setup, and only serve as negotiating vehicles for TV money.  Why not just combine into one league and hold playoffs.  The NCAA and shit schools can get fucked.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, PilotsError said:

I predict the conferences are still acting as competitors and not collaborators.  

This is what drives me crazy. When the PAC collapsed and Stanford/Cal joined the ACC, it should have rang an alarm that this is getting absurd, time to regroup and figure out a better system. But here we are, just nonsense. I think in ten years the top 20 bluebloods will form a league to drop the Big 10 and SEC LEECHES!! from their ranks so that every team makes eleventy billion dollars. I also think that if people act rationally, football will be separated entirely so that the rest of the sports can realign along sane geographic lines. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bottlecap said:

Promotion/Relegation

West Ham United bizarrely wins at least two national championships.  Northwestern and LSU (in a freakishly bad 2028 season) get relegated to the Dutch second division.  LSU comes close to being promoted back up just three times in that 20 year timespan.  But, then decides to focus on baseball.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, 'stache said:

This is what drives me crazy. When the PAC collapsed and Stanford/Cal joined the ACC, it should have rang an alarm that this is getting absurd, time to regroup and figure out a better system. But here we are, just nonsense. I think in ten years the top 20 bluebloods will form a league to drop the Big 10 and SEC LEECHES!! from their ranks so that every team makes eleventy billion dollars. I also think that if people act rationally, football will be separated entirely so that the rest of the sports can realign along sane geographic lines. 

The players and schools that stand to lose most from collaboration are the only ones with the power to actually organize.  And the next tier down all thinks they'll be the ones riding the coattails to easy money.  That's why a player's union or a more united league structure won't happen anytime soon.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck if I know, but one might speculate based on changes and the rate of change since December, 2003:

2003 - 5 apparently set and stable power conferences; champion determined by polls; no legit NIL; no portal.

2023 - Pac “10” kaput; ACC on life support; P “3” alive and well for now; next year 12-team playoff; NIL evolving daily; lubed portal orgasms.

2043 - two 40-team super conferences aligned with air hubs DFW and O’Hare; 24-team playoff; pooled NIL with nationwide player salaries + scoring, sack, pancake and turnover bounties; in-game transfers to opponents or any other team allowed.

Well, shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tx 3 putt said:

A cap is coming

How? The schools themselves aren't paying beyond the scholarship and "full cost of tuition". NIL collectives are associated with the school, but they're playing for a players name, image, and likeness, not paying them to play sports....Like an NFL player getting endorsements that technically have nothing to do with their team contract. 

Two things I think will have to happen long term are changes to the transfer rules, and changes in NIL contracts to multi-year. We've gone guardrail to guardrail with transfer rules. I'd be in favor of something like 1 "free" transfer, then you have to sit out a year if you transfer a second time. Maybe a waiver if the head coach gets fired or something, but this model of kids looking to transfer every season for a better NIL deal are unsustainable. Then maybe put buyouts in multi-year NIL deals. If you want to transfer to play QB at Auburn, Auburn NIL has to pay your buyout to Georgia's NIL collective or whatever.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

How? The schools themselves aren't paying beyond the scholarship and "full cost of tuition". NIL collectives are associated with the school, but they're playing for a players name, image, and likeness, not paying them to play sports....Like an NFL player getting endorsements that technically have nothing to do with their team contract. 

Two things I think will have to happen long term are changes to the transfer rules, and changes in NIL contracts to multi-year. We've gone guardrail to guardrail with transfer rules. I'd be in favor of something like 1 "free" transfer, then you have to sit out a year if you transfer a second time. Maybe a waiver if the head coach gets fired or something, but this model of kids looking to transfer every season for a better NIL deal are unsustainable. Then maybe put buyouts in multi-year NIL deals. If you want to transfer to play QB at Auburn, Auburn NIL has to pay your buyout to Georgia's NIL collective or whatever.  


just nuke it all. Force the nfl to start a minor league 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that most of the portal and NIL issues will be regulated in some way by the end of this decade.  

I also see violence in the sport and resulting injuries will probably do more to change the game than anything.   

There will be different levels that play different versions of the game, where the mid to lower tier play something akin to 7 on 7, and the upper tier will play full contact to feed the NFL machine.

Also climate will play a hand in scheduling, or at the very least push those high tier teams to either play games at night on in domes.  No more 11 AM or 2:30 games in August/September at least.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pyrohornIII said:

I also see violence in the sport and resulting injuries will probably do more to change the game than anything.   

I’m surprised this is being left out.  I know plenty of people who are football fans but wouldn’t let their kids play, unlike in the past.  

Assuming we get more CTE info, things could take a turn.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...