Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

By tempering it with the Constitution, I don't think you can call them religious nuts or fanatics.  Had they been fanatics, the various factions represented never would have gotten together.

Never really heard Quakers referred to as religious fanatics, either.

 

I'm talking about colonial and early Americans. You're talking about the Founders. Those are two very different things.

Posted
22 hours ago, safe sex said:

Yes everyone here is aware that Quinn is a piece of shit

He’s a dumb kid.  I had some dumb beliefs when I was his age too. Not dumb like voting for an obvious conman who grifts the shit out of the dumbest people in this country, of which there are a fuckload, but definitely I had some questionable actions. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I'm talking about colonial and early Americans. You're talking about the Founders. Those are two very different things.

I'm talking about founders because that's what Hermanator said.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:



The chemical abortion drug war will have to wait until after we invade Mexico.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He’ll call it a special military operation.

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
2 hours ago, David Dennison said:

That's where it all comes from culturally. Throw Quakerism in there, too. America has a long history of religious fanaticism, even if the Founders tempered it with the Constitution.

All religions should be fanatics like the Quakers.

Quakerism is a religious movement begun by George Fox in the 17th century. Quakers believe that all people have access to the inner light of direct communion with God. They believe in the spiritual equality of all people, pacifism, consensus, and simplicity.”

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Where does this "religious nut" shit come from?  Sure, they were nominally Christian for the most part, but there's about zero evidence that any of them were religious nuts, certainly by modern standards.  First Amendment belies that whole notion.

And, yeah, there was slavery, which was tolerated more than endorsed, and subjugation of women.  Standard shit for the times.  Not making excuses for it, it is what it is and it was more progressive than any other contemporary nation.

 

Salem Witch trials seems pretty religious nut to me.

image.jpeg.676f4ca32e76f9019fad07c5f527d77e.jpeg

2 hours ago, David Dennison said:

I'm talking about colonial and early Americans. You're talking about the Founders. Those are two very different things.

 

image.png.b786569b08e474008e8e298b4b460b53.png

 

Edited by Bullneck
  • Haha 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

This is a classic Trump misdirection. He doesn’t want the media talking about his debt ceiling loss this week or keep talking about President Elon. Instead he makes a wild claim and the media jumps at it 24/7.

the worse the real story is for him, the crazier the comment he makes.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Rex Kramer said:

I’m not that person. I’ve been increasingly anti-social lately. I do not really hang out with these people here in town.

Now, my college friends are 100% Trump.  I can’t talk politics with them. 

I have an ability to hang with any group. I will not let someone’s politics, unless they are way too extreme, affect the way I feel about them.

What?  The guys that sang "there will never be a nigger SAE" are 100% Trump?   You don't say? 

Edited by Gil Bang
  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

This is a classic Trump misdirection. He doesn’t want the media talking about his debt ceiling loss this week or keep talking about President Elon. Instead he makes a wild claim and the media jumps at it 24/7.

the worse the real story is for him, the crazier the comment he makes.


Are we gonna spitball the idea of buying Geeenland again? That’s gotta still be on the wheel of shitfuckcrazy.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Jive Turkey said:

We taking Canada, Panama, Mexico, and Greenland.

 

I wouldn’t give up Puerto Rico to get it, but he’s not wrong about Greenland

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
Posted
1 hour ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I wouldn’t give up Puerto Rico to get it, but he’s not wrong about Greenland

They just want to harvest it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I wouldn’t give up Puerto Rico to get it, but he’s not wrong about Greenland

Or, I mean....we could simply be a good NATO partner and have all the access to Greenland we want or need that way.

TLDR; Why buy when you can rent it for cheaper?

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Or, I mean....we could simply be a good NATO partner and have all the access to Greenland we want or need that way.

TLDR; Why buy when you can rent it for cheaper?

I'm not sure we can rent it cheaper going forward. For what it's worth Greenlanders seem to broadly prefer independence with EU membership, but I'm not sure how realistic or sustinable that is for anybody.  

Worth pointing out that Greenland is in North America, and we've got a pretty strong claim.

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
Posted

Well, we have to have a period of deep rural pain to finally eliminate those family owned farms that have been treasonously not selling their property to ConAgra.  President Trump will fix that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I'm not sure we can rent it cheaper going forward. For what it's worth Greenlanders seem to broadly prefer independence with EU membership, but I'm not sure how realistic or sustinable that is for anybody.  

Worth pointing out that Greenland is in North America, and we've got a pretty strong claim.

At the risk of my sarcasm meter being broken, what claim of ownership over Greenland does the United States have?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
9 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Well, we have to have a period of deep rural pain to finally eliminate those family owned farms that have been treasonously not selling their property to ConAgra.  President Trump will fix that.

Take greenland now, sell it to mineral companies to strip it bare over the next couple of decades. Then they sell it to Conagra to become the new Midwest when climate change turns the lower Midwest into a barren wasteland.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
Just now, TexasHooch said:

Bahamas would be cool.

We've already deployed our big guns. In a year's time, just think of how much they'll be willing to trade to make Hershel Walker leave.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, bolverk said:

At the risk of my sarcasm meter being broken, what claim of ownership over Greenland does the United States have?

A Bigly one. Duh!

if global warming gets worse, we’re going to need access to ice.  Lots of ice.  Trump is playing 5D chess while libtards focus on carbon emissions. 



×
×
  • Create New...