Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, mchookem said:

ahhahahahaha 🤣

y'all remember a couple months ago Trump bitching about his portrait in the CO Capitol bldg? 

20250626_221007.thumb.jpg.75a8af7ff4f2eb855539eb76ebc15233.jpg

 

well they sent a new portrait to hang...

20250626_221026.thumb.jpg.aab97a27b52ca0be69601af55dbcb753.jpg

lmfao 

👨‍🍳's 💋 🤣

 

That looks like a courtroom sketch. Is that a courtroom sketch?

Posted
On 6/26/2025 at 12:52 PM, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Trump now has personal control over many business decisions by US Steel as part of the agreement to let Nippon Steel purchase them. Perfectly normal for a president to take over a private company. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/26/trump-golden-share-us-steel-nippon-merger.html
 

The new business charter does state that power is retained by the federal govt after Trump leave office but presumably there’s nothing stopping Trump from transferring that power to himself or his family. Or he can decide to reward himself whatever distribution he wants.

It reminds me when Obama gave himself power over many businesses in his 8 years. Oh wait, that never happened. 

This is fucking insane 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

Make this scumbag and that other insurrectionist shitbird that got pardoned by Trump with the child porn into household names. We all to this day remember the name Willie Horton and that was a long ago, kinder, gentler Republican party that made those ads. 

Edited by Bojack
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted

It's like they found a racism/sexism cheat code, and are just going to hammer it for as long as they can. Non-white, non-male = Not deserving. White men however, are always deserving. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
It's like they found a racism/sexism cheat code, and are just going to hammer it for as long as they can. Non-white, non-male = Not deserving. White men however, are always deserving. 

White, land owning males. Thats the only people that they want having any power / influence.
Posted
33 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Non-white, non-male = Not deserving. White men however, are always deserving. 

This is 100% the rule that they have an constantly apply.  White men, by definition, cannot be a DEI hire, so they MUST be a merit hire.

Minorities/women CAN be a DEI hire, and therefore, all such hires ARE DEI hires, and are not merit-based.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

Most of the right wing personalities couldn't qualify to run a McDonalds.  Shoving a dildo in your ass, being a drunk, crying and raging during interviews, is what passes for republican thought leaders.   

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

I could strangle him to death and not feel a single thing.

Not even when his lil eyes popped and his tongue came out?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

White men, by definition, cannot be a DEI hire,

Counterpoint, sacks of shit like swam that fake an injury in the military and ride the veteran DEI status for the rest of their careers.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
4 hours ago, Goofyboy said:


White, land owning males. Thats the only people that they want having any power / influence.

Well they picked the right country. It’s almost like this place was designed that way or something 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Pancho said:

Still pumping that $1.98 lie lol


TORBUSH

 

So if inflation has been defeated, does that mean we're going to have deflation? Because.... That doesn't go well. At least that's what the economists tell me. But what do they know. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, NWBuck said:

image.png.aebd9d37c93ce6a84e3307b44ead7c31.png

Charlie Kirk is a child of privilege with a substandard intellect with a shit stained soul.

Fuck him, I pray to Moloch he gets dick cancer.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, miguelito said:

And Kirk's only there because he's a white man.

and thats entirely why he made the comment you quoted. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I wonder what % of Charlie Kirk's shares and engagement are well meaning, reasonable people who disagree and ridicule his horrendous bullshit. Either way he gets paid, and the more engagement he gets only stimulates the algorithms to spread his garbage even further

Posted
9 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

I could strangle him to death and not feel a single thing.

 

7 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Not even when his lil eyes popped and his tongue came out?

IMG_8735.gif.df6f96ed1370d37d63085c0c38913366.gif

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Derka said:

a guy i’ve known basically my entire life, who is a huge republican donor, posted this to his IG story:

can’t wrap my head around it. not even one little bit. it’s surreal. i mean, we live in TEXAS. what better living example is there that the republican party is the one that insists on being all up in your shit?!?! how can you live here every single day and think that the republican party is the party of small government? i don’t know if i will every get used to how many of my peers are the dumbest, most gullible fucking chumps on the planet. 

Whenever Rex or whoever the fuck calls CR an echo chamber/cabal and you start questioning if they’re right just go look at that comment section full of retards.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
2 hours ago, UpperWestside said:

When you see people as they are it really makes you think back to growing up in Texas. Seeing what my hometown of Lampasas now is made me think back to if there were signs of this when I was a child that I would not have paid much attention to because, you know, I was a kid. I thought back and many things I saw as a kid made me realize that most of what I saw growing up was a complete farce. 

Same here.  

I didn't realize it at the time but very few of my 1978 classmates from Corpus would ever leave town.  Half of them went to aigy, with the rest split between UT and a smattering of other schools.  Looking them up now on Facebook is, uh, interesting.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Seems important.

 

 

 

This is the future buckle up, elections delayed when dear leader is unpopular, elections when he starts a war and spaghetti forgive wins it. Most likely after extreme handouts like during covid. Elections cancelled after he has totalitarian power.

Edited by linux
Posted

The argument isn't invalid though, to align with other standard election cycles in an attempt to boost voter turnout.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
The argument isn't invalid though, to align with other standard election cycles in an attempt to boost voter turnout.

This is correct. And I’m an alarmist, but this sort of thing isn’t unprecedented. Lots of local entities have/had May elections. They either delayed or moved them up in some cases to align with November elections, meaning they are much cheaper to run (the state was already going to have polling places set up). Some officials might see their term extended slightly, or shortened slightly.

Now, will THIS admin pull some other shenanigans? Of course.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...