Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, SimonBolivar said:

Come on now. I'm a daily Times reader and while they are incredibly frustrating in trying to "well, both sides" arguments from time to time, there was no doubt they were going to endorse Harris over Trump. 

Trumpists say that "mainstream media" is all liberals, and progressives say that "mainstream media" is conservative.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Might be anecdotal, but sure seems like Elon has taken off any attempt to curate Twitter feeds based on activity and are just actively pumping pure right wing nonsense to everyone.  Just nonstop bullshit from the moment I logged on today.

 

Nope that’s exactly what’s happening. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Might be anecdotal, but sure seems like Elon has taken off any attempt to curate Twitter feeds based on activity and are just actively pumping pure right wing nonsense to everyone.  Just nonstop bullshit from the moment I logged on today.

I’m old. I use Twitter for essentially breaking sports or national news. I’d like to pull the plug on it.

If you block Musk and every thing you see that you don’t want to see, after about a month your feed is much better. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Might be anecdotal, but sure seems like Elon has taken off any attempt to curate Twitter feeds based on activity and are just actively pumping pure right wing nonsense to everyone.  Just nonstop bullshit from the moment I logged on today.

 

2 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Nope that’s exactly what’s happening. 

It might be time to stop giving the fascist your clicks, then.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Might be anecdotal, but sure seems like Elon has taken off any attempt to curate Twitter feeds based on activity and are just actively pumping pure right wing nonsense to everyone.  Just nonstop bullshit from the moment I logged on today.

Its truly fucking nuts.  That asshole spent 44 billion of his and the Saudi's money so that he could bombard me with 'promoted' conservative political posts and shitty ads from Sticker Mule.    

Posted
1 minute ago, CTC2 said:

I’m old. I use Twitter for essentially breaking sports or national news. I’d like to pull the plug on it.

If you block Musk and every thing you see that you don’t want to see, after about a month your feed is much better. 

Unfortunately Apartheid Karen removed the ability to block Ads unless you pay for his shit product.  So I'm bombarded with conservative ads and promoted posts.  I've blocked thousands of blue check accounts but replies are still full of political ads and bots. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I'll give you the first personal example I can think of. 

I play in an annual golf tournament with 40 dudes that are all around 40-50 years old. Vast majority went to private school, grew up in classic conservative families, married with multiple kids, and work in O&G, attorneys, private equity, etc.  Honestly I truly like all of them, but I'd guess that at least 75% are Trump voters (we don't talk politics on this trip, thankfully). 

Every one of them smokes weed or takes gummies. Don't think it would change many of their votes, but it's a no brainer to loudly be pro-marijuana. 

 

 

Those guys DGAF because they’re white and upper class. They’re not going to get pulled over and get popped for a low level weed offense. They can still pull the lever for the GQP and keeping weed illegal because there’s no negative repercussions for them (except, you know, the whole fascism thing).

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
Just now, royiv said:

Those guys DGAF because they’re white and upper class. They’re not going to get pulled over and get popped for a low level weed offense. They can still pull the lever for the GQP and keeping weed illegal because there’s no negative repercussions for them (except, you know, the whole fascism thing).

100%. But there is no downside to actively being pro-marijuana. Last time I saw a research poll it was down to around 10% of Americans that wanted marijuana to be illegal. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

Yes, they are registered to vote. Using marijuana doesn't preclude you from being a normal engaged person.

I ate half a gummy one time and I immediately got blood-shot eyes, sprouted a Cheech Marin mustache, and started calling everybody “man,” man. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:


Same. My friends all call him “tfg”.

To outsiders we say it’s short for “the former guy.”

But we all know it’s “that fucking guy.”

My entire family calls him dotard.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I know this full interview was posted earlier, but some comments about this clip. 

Mark Cuban is great here. He's not "triggered" or angry, he is patient and friendly with Vonn, and succinctly states his issues with Donald Trump without coming off as arrogant or mean. 

But just watch Theo fucking Vonn. 

 

Cuban: "Trump has ripped off a lot of people I know."

Vonn: "There have been a lot  alleged issues with contractors."

Cuban "No, people I know have been ripped off." Tells story of co-worker having to sue Trump for not paying her $4 million. 

Vonn:  "But how does someone benefit from behaving like that?"

Cuban says this is who Trump is and all he knows. He was born rich. 

Vonn: "He always had good hair. Rich people always have good hair."  Cuban laughs off a bad joke and total deflection. 

Cuban lists off Trump businesses that have ripped off hardworking Americans. He incredulously laughs at Trump's commemorative coin bullshit. 

Vonn: "That's gangster, bro."

 

What a fucking joke. Cuban comes on the show in good faith, and Vonn returns the favor by having absolutely no desire to genuinely discuss any of his factual points. Vonn's instincts are to defend Trump, doubt any criticism, and call him a "gangster" with "great hair." 

Vonn's listeners will not take Cuban seriously if Vonn himself doesn't. Which makes these type of interviews pointless IMO.

Idiocracy on full display. I now get why Kamala or Walz shouldn't entertain going on Rogan, Vonn, or any other podcast from these clowns. The fix is already in with these piece of shit Trump apologists. 

 

That's why I'm all for having Cuban or Pete go on, but no way for Kamala or Walz.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
37 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

but are they registered to vote ? there’s a difference between a ‘user’ and a ‘user’ that consistently votes 

Texas deadline is Oct 7. Texas is usually in the bottom 10%’for voter turnout 

100% of medical use should be very low cost to free to all 

Many years ago, when legalization for medical purposes was being discussed, I heard a radio show host asking people to call in if they used it for medical purposes.

Some dude with a stoner voice calls in and says he uses it every day for two medical conditions...Attention Deficit Disorder and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, G650 said:

I haven't looked at Twitter in a year and my life is AOK

I follow a couple of accounts professionally (Mostly for House floor updates).  Beyond specifically going to that persons feed and reading it, I don't use it at all.  I haven't looked at my wall in years. 

Posted
1 hour ago, HenryJames said:

Only stoners smoke marijuana in the year of our lord 2024. No one else uses any type of recreational marijuana product. 

04dc3fbe-cab0-4182-be98-587ca55bc751_tex

 

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Might be anecdotal, but sure seems like Elon has taken off any attempt to curate Twitter feeds based on activity and are just actively pumping pure right wing nonsense to everyone.  Just nonstop bullshit from the moment I logged on today.

stay in "Following" instead of "For You"

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

I follow a couple of accounts professionally (Mostly for House floor updates).  Beyond specifically going to that persons feed and reading it, I don't use it at all.  I haven't looked at my wall in years. 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, royiv said:

Those guys DGAF because they’re white and upper class. They’re not going to get pulled over and get popped for a low level weed offense. They can still pull the lever for the GQP and keeping weed illegal because there’s no negative repercussions for them (except, you know, the whole fascism thing).

And if anyone (daughter, wife, not their wife) in their life has an unwanted pregnancy, flying to another state is not a big deal. They might even be anti-abortion but they believe in exception for themselves.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Might be anecdotal, but sure seems like Elon has taken off any attempt to curate Twitter feeds based on activity and are just actively pumping pure right wing nonsense to everyone.  Just nonstop bullshit from the moment I logged on today.

 

47 minutes ago, Pancho said:

 

Nope that’s exactly what’s happening. 

If it wasn't for sports I'd have no reason to have a Twitter. Too much good sports information breaks there. Threads needs to step it up!

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
47 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

I ate half a gummy one time and I immediately got blood-shot eyes, sprouted a Cheech Marin mustache, and started calling everybody “man,” man. 

Asking for, a friend, of course. Eh, which brand was that? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

 

If it wasn't for sports I'd have no reason to have a Twitter. Too much good sports information breaks there. Threads needs to step it up!

Yeah, if you follow inside beltway chatter, it's still an essential tool.  I don't mean campaign hot takes, but like what's actually happening in the House and Senate Caucuses in real time or the floor.  I couldn't do my job without Olivia Beavers, Jake Sherman, John Bresnahan, Sarah Ferris, etc. Used to be Manu Raju, but he got promoted to TV fulltime and isn't creeping around in the basement of the Senate anymore. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

Good friend of mine; his FIL is close to 90.   Some years ago, he had some kind of back injury from his job, and the remedy was about 5 lbs of stainless shit they put around his spine.  As you can imagine it, things did not go well and he had it all removed sometime after that.  Since that time, he has had back pain, trouble walking, quality of life stuff.  Also, he was a deacon in a Baptist church, for another data point.

Then medical weed was approved in his state.   His daughter and granddaughter wondered if it would do him any good, so they talked him into a script.  He didn't want to smoke, so chocolate edibles was his preferred method of delivery.  That's been 3-4 years ago, and he was a changed man overnight.  He can sleep, he doesn't have the back pain, etc.  Once every 2 weeks or so he goes to his local dispensary, gets a refill and that's that.  He hasn't had to take any of the multiple prescription meds he was on to manage his pain.

 

 

Bet he still thinks it's the devil and is voting Trump. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Bet he still thinks it's the devil and is voting Trump. 

 

Probably.  I mean, Troy is level headed, isn't overly political, I've never heard him complain about immigration, etc.  But, yeah.  He's a poster child for the effectivness of cannabis on quality of life.  Where he once used a walker, he now walks normally.

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, royiv said:

Those guys DGAF because they’re white and upper class. They’re not going to get pulled over and get popped for a low level weed offense. They can still pull the lever for the GQP and keeping weed illegal because there’s no negative repercussions for them (except, you know, the whole fascism thing).

Have them hang out at Whitewater Amphitheater with their weed... they might change their tune.  Know quite a few people popped there.  

Posted
5 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

I think Florida flips....I had it as a meme about 2-3 weeks ago but I think it could legit happen.

5 hours ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

I think there will be more than one (good) surprise this election

100% agree. I think there will be far more Republicans voting for Harris than many people believe or than the polls indicate. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
On 9/29/2024 at 8:09 AM, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Americas finest at the GA-Bama game. John Daly is hanging around there too. I would like to hear more about whose suite it is. I would bet that it’s a rich bama alum who is having legal or regulatory problems with the feds,

 

 

-XCh2KvdxO8Afqs7rx7j4SWYvqEr7lmNDLwI5c1x

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
5 hours ago, chainsaw said:

If you watch that episode, Vonn says that Kamala's people have reached out and he is interested in having her on. So I wouldn't be surprised if she comes on.

She would treat him or Rogan like a naughty but redeemable nephew and it would go over great. That's the story that show's whole demographic tells itself: "I'm the loveable rascal who exasperates the women in my life, but they love me anyway".  I think it is completely in Kamala's wheelhouse to be the favorite aunt who smacks your hand for trying to sneak a taste before the table is set and tells you to get the hell out of her kitchen, with a smile. A great opportunity to dampen enthusiasm against her in that audience, and maybe to win some voters she couldn't convince through any other means.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pancho said:

radical senate r’s already coming out saying they won’t confirm Harris Supreme Court nominees 

 

 

Come On Wow GIF by BrownSugarApp

 

If it 51-49, they can pick off Murkowski or Collins pretty easily.  Only need 50 to pass a SCOTUS nominee.  

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
4 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

the storm washed out the hillbillies, not the cities and university towns 

the people hit the hardest were already voting for trump and don’t forget ….

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Js1 said:

If it 51-49, they can pick off Murkowski or Collins pretty easily.  Only need 50 to pass a SCOTUS nominee.  

If republicans get 51 or more seats can they reinstate the 60 threshold for scotus nominees by simple majority?

Edited by 'stache
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, 'stache said:

If republicans get 51 or more seats can they reinstate the 60 threshold for scotus nominees?

They could, but they didn't the times they held the Senate for 5 years from 2015 to the end of 2020. 

it really doesn't matter bc Senate Majority Leader Cruz wouldn't even bring it up for a vote.

Edited by Js1
  • Rage+1 1


×
×
  • Create New...