Jump to content

Charlie Kirk assassinated at an event in Utah (by a 22 YO groyper)


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Inasmuch as that has been illegal for quite some time now, why hasn't anyone sued?

And, can you say with complete, or really any confidence that the "certain races, genders, etc." were less competent or meritorious than the mediocre white men they "replaced"?

Or could it be that management is rewarded for recruiting competent and qualified "certain races, genders, etc". and insuring they don't get passed over by the good ol' boy system?

Justin Timberlake What GIF

Posted

We're still talking about a podcaster, right? With horrific views on just about everything that run counter to the teachings of Christ?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Oh, good grief.  This has jumped the shark now:

 

And on this day there were probably 200 people fired by their companies for posting mundane tweets wondering why nobody seemed to give a shit about the murdered Minn legislators.  And this guy gets to say this shit.

Heretical.  I grew up Catholic, and about once a month my wife tells me, when I talk about how we need to be big tent and attract more Catholics to the Dems, "Why the hell would you want Catholics in your tent?"

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

How was that available?

On steam you can set whatever display name you want that's separate from your account login, they're probably referring to that. It's used frequently for shitposting and goofs and roleplaying in games

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Jesus, I mean, fuck CK but that's a little macabre to have a fucking 3D model of his murder

It's a very bad idea for many reasons. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 hours ago, 'stache said:

How COme yOuNG pEOPle are ABaNDoNInG cHUrcH

I actually thought I heard just yesterday that it's the opposite, young people are rebounding the numbers (Gen Z, etc.)

  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Jesus, I mean, fuck CK but that's a little macabre to have a fucking 3D model of his murder

 

key chains ?

 

 

IMG_5342.jpeg

Edited by tx 3 putt
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

Goddammit.  I did the same thing.  Except it was with gals with great boobs.  Just went straight to one of those.

Dammit.  I'm racist against women with no curves.  Mea culpa.

Titist.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Covri said:

This is wrong on so many levels. The 95 Dems endorsing this is all we need to know about the state of the Democratic Party. 
 


https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/119-2025/h282

image.thumb.png.ac7d8284222e69ac9323b4726b05df11.png

 

Just now, royiv said:

My dem rep voted yea. Good grief.

95 people probably pretty wisely deciding that it's not worth the harassment that they'd receive for a NO vote on something that's going to pass anyway. "Every single Democrat voted against honoring a great man" is exactly what Fox News was hoping for. 

They'll still do some variation of that, mind you.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

 

95 people probably pretty wisely deciding that it's not worth the harassment that they'd receive for a NO vote on something that's going to pass anyway. "Every single Democrat voted against honoring a great man" is exactly what Fox News was hoping for. 

They'll still do some variation of that, mind you.

This post brought to you by Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries.

Posted
44 minutes ago, The Original Greaser Bob said:

And on this day there were probably 200 people fired by their companies for posting mundane tweets wondering why nobody seemed to give a shit about the murdered Minn legislators.  And this guy gets to say this shit.

Heretical.  I grew up Catholic, and about once a month my wife tells me, when I talk about how we need to be big tent and attract more Catholics to the Dems, "Why the hell would you want Catholics in your tent?"

I'll speak to this: because they'll bring booze.  Good stuff, and a lot of it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Inasmuch as that has been illegal for quite some time now, why hasn't anyone sued?

And, can you say with complete, or really any confidence that the "certain races, genders, etc." were less competent or meritorious than the mediocre white men they "replaced"?

Or could it be that management is rewarded for recruiting competent and qualified "certain races, genders, etc". and insuring they don't get passed over by the good ol' boy system?

Este^

Posted
8 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

 

95 people probably pretty wisely deciding that it's not worth the harassment that they'd receive for a NO vote on something that's going to pass anyway. "Every single Democrat voted against honoring a great man" is exactly what Fox News was hoping for. 

They'll still do some variation of that, mind you.

I hear you, but I would have more respect if they voted present rather than yea or nay.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Good to see the CR doing the degenerate shit again. 

There is really nothing the CR can say that is more sacrilegious than what CK’s fans are doing at the moment.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Pancho said:

Wtf

 

This same way USA ended up with so many public statues honoring traitorous confederate generals during the 1950's - snowflake response to the emergence of the Civil Rights Movement.  Fast forward 75 years and the snowflakes have new culture war symbol to "honor" by shoving a statue down the public's throat. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

We're still talking about a podcaster, right? With horrific views on just about everything that run counter to the teachings of Christ?

You know this, but the deification of Charlie + shifting blame to the trans community is critical. They’ve decided it’s the pretext for whatever horrible things MAGA wants to do next anyway. The facts will be made to fit the narrative.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Evil Bill Obrien said:

I'd disparage this as being Okie trash shit but we are probably going to do the same thing in Texas...

and they'll have to be 1sqft bigger than the Oklahoma ones.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Degenerate Gardner said:

You know this, but the deification of Charlie + shifting blame to the trans community is critical. They’ve decided it’s the pretext for whatever horrible things MAGA wants to do next anyway. The facts will be made to fit the narrative.

This. They are always disingenuous. They never let a tragedy go to waste. It’s all part of their game. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

Good to see the CR doing the degenerate shit again. 

Such an ass. 
I respect enchubben more than you(and that ain’t much). He at least states what he believes in. You just try to talk down everyone and show them how smart you are. Ignore list added to. You and futureman only 2 I have on it. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

That's gonna be the Commission from Hell for whichever artist gets railroaded into it. The head will never be right.

I think we have just the artiste for this project.  Check out his portfolio:

_95390528_ronaldobust.jpg.webp

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 'stache said:

How COme yOuNG pEOPle are ABaNDoNInG cHUrcH

 

3 hours ago, South Austin said:

 

Maybe no so insane if they're desperate to get some of those young conservative Christian Charlie Kirk fans into their congregations.

Christianity is starting to make a comeback in the U.S. and other western countries, led by young people.

Why it matters: A decades-long decline has stalled, shaping the future of Gen Z, the drivers of the religion revival.

“We’ve seen the plateau of non-religion in America,” says Ryan Burge, a political scientist at Eastern Illinois University. “Gen Z is not that much less religious than their parents, and that’s a big deal.”

By the numbers: Data from Pew shows that, for decades, each age group has been less Christian than the one before it.

Americans born in the 1970s are 63% Christian. 1980s babies are 53% Christian, and 1990s babies are 46% Christian.

But there was no decline from the 1990s to the 2000s. Americans born in the 2000s are also 46% Christian.

Stunning stat: Gen Z-ers — especially Gen Z men — are actually more likely to attend weekly religious services than millennials and even some younger Gen X-ers, Burge’s analysis shows.

Between the lines: Young men are leading American’s religion resurgence.

Within older generations, there’s a consistent gender gap among Christians, with women more likely to be religious than men.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/10/religious-young-people-christianity-rise



×
×
  • Create New...