Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I forget, was this before or after Trump accused him of committing treason? 

hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEhCK4FEIIDSFryq4qpAx

During Trump accusing him of treason.  That's why Obama is laughing.

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I started to say something like "I wonder how Obama would feel about a third term", but I'm sure this Supreme Court would nix that while also greenlighting a Trump third term.

We have to take a strict originalist reading. If the authors of that amendment had intended to give an exception to allow a 3rd term to Obama they would have written thus. Likewise if they ever intended the prohibition on a third term to apply to Trump, they should have explained that part.

Edited by 956 Worldwide
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted

Trump: I am announcing my intentions for a 3rd term as your President. 
 

SCOTUS: we must uphold the Constitution and not allow a 3rd term as President for anyone. 
 

Trump: I’ll be sending in the National Guard to the Supreme Court building to remove those nasty, unpatriotic people. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Bevo Num1 said:

Putting on my tinfoil hat, I'm beginning to think this administration is trying to stage a war economy by bringing manufacturing back to the US. We're already starting to see the European front escalating between Russia and NATO, the Middle East front between Israel and Iran. All that's left is the Asia front between the US and China. The recent news of Russia training the Chinese on a Taiwan invasion, Japan rebuilding it's military, and North Korea defending it's nuclear weapons program to the UN tells me we are headed towards a larger global conflict. I hope I'm wrong. 


Denmark and Germany report large numbers of drones in their airspace, including over military installations.

https://www.newsweek.com/nato-drones-germany-russia-denmark-10808850

2 hours ago, Snake Diggity said:

I’m sure Trump gathering all his military leaders and telling them they are about to be used to fight “the enemy within” has absolutely nothing at all to do with the massive anti-Trump protests scheduled for October 18th in every major city in the country.  Purely coincidence.

I’ll still be attending. These protests have all been peaceful, though military jets have been added to the dynamic.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
37 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Normally, I concur.

But when someone is outspokenly anti-gay, as is Johnson, it becomes an issue.

Well if you're strictly talking about hypocrisy, I agree.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Trump announces that the US is guaranteeing Qatar security:

I'm sure this has nothing to do with the 747 that Qatar donated to Trump.

Even if an foreign relation exec order is fully legitimate and in the best interest of the US, this is why we have those pesky rules of not allowing President to personally accept material gifts, like an expensive watch or a $400m plane. You can't decouple the legitimacy from the illegitimacy. 

Not to mention the $1.5B they invested in Kushner's Affinity Partners. Bought themselves a pretty neat military for only a couple of billion. Art of the deal indeed.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

"Extensive studies of homosexual relationships" while getting a BBA at LSU.

I think that means glory holes and arcade booths.

Bet he got BBC while there, too.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

Legend ?

Bwa ha ha ha ha…..

yeah, legendary shittiness. I mean, anyone who can fuck up Sweet Home Alabama should just be shot. that's why I'm not in charge

Posted (edited)

the funny/sad/frustrating/humiliating/[pick your adjective] part is that 54k jobs isn't that many. Biden had monthly growth of 800k+ four (4) times in just his four years. 

Edited by Longhorn_Fan68
Posted

check this out

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285023/gov.uscourts.dcd.285023.12.0.pdf

Quote

A federal grand jury refused to return an indictment in this case. This was once unheard of, but has become common as of late. Typically, when a federal grand jury refuses to return an indictment in a case, either the government takes the message as a warning to go no further or, hopefully in only the rarest of cases, presents the indictment again to another federal grand jury. To this judge’s knowledge, what has never happened before is doing an end run around the federal grand jury completely. Yet that is what has happened today.

Quote

Today, prosecutors again presented a single count federal indictment against the defendant, but this time before a Superior Court grand jury. After receiving a true bill from that local grand jury, prosecutors sought to return the federal indictment in federal court. At a minimum, this is very unseemly; more than likely, it is unlawful. Not to mention, this only deepens the growing mistrust of the actions of prosecutors.

That is a sentiment that was once unthinkable, but the irregular is now the regular. See Fed. Educ. Ass’n v. Trump, No. 25-1362, 2025 WL 2355747, at *11 (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 2025) (Judge Friedman, a renowned former prosecutor and judge, recently collected cases addressing this topic, and concluded that “n just six months, the President of the United States may have forfeited the right to [] a presumption of regularity.”). Prosecutors used to not look for loopholes. They sought justice and respected the decisions of juries, favorable or not.

 



×
×
  • Create New...